SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

ANALYSIS OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION WITH RESPECT TO THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE

Semin PAKSOY
Süleyman Bilgin KILIÇ
Pages
59–76
Publication Date
2016-04-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show that in the euro area economic development evenly improves the status of both females and males.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz Gender discrimination is a social phenomenon by preventing women from the participation of the economic, social and political life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, first a cross-country multivariate-analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) is performed to compare socio-economic conditions of female and male population with respect to ten relevant gender discrimination indicators for the time period of 2005-2013.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show that in the euro area economic development evenly improves the status of both females and males.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Gender discrimination · European Union · Economic development

Özet

Öz Gender discrimination is a social phenomenon by preventing women from the participation of the economic, social and political life. Main research questions of this study are; firstly is there any gender discrimination within European Union (EU) countries considering three groups of economic development level, and secondly, what are the effects of economic development on gender discrimination? In the study, first a cross-country multivariate-analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) is performed to compare socio-economic conditions of female and male population with respect to ten relevant gender discrimination indicators for the time period of 2005-2013. Second, a cross-country regression analysis is performed among the EU countries to observe that economic development has any explanatory power on gender discrimination indicator. Results show that in the euro area economic development evenly improves the status of both females and males. However, not depending on the economic development level there is a persistent and high level of gender pay-gap exists in the euro area for the period considered.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAKSOY, S., KILIÇ, S. B. (2016). ANALYSIS OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION WITH RESPECT TO THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 59–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/73405

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abbas, Q., Hameed, A. and Waheed, A. (2011). Gender discrimination & its effect on employee performance/productivity. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1:15 (Special Issue – October ), 170-176.
  2. Akkoyun, Y. and Erkan, T.M. (2014). Lifelong learning case study from Turkish public sector: business process management in social security operations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1154-1159.
  3. Atkinson, A. B., Marlier, E. and Nolan, B. (2004). Indicators and targets for social inclusion in the European Union. JCMS, 42: 1, 47-75.
  4. Aydın, F. F. (2015). Women‟s labor participation rates and competitiveness in the G7 countries. The Sakarya Journal of Economics / Sakarya İktisat Dergisi, 3, 30-43.
  5. Balaev, M. (2014). Improving models of democracy: the example of lagged effects of economic development, education and gender equality. Social Science Research, 46, 169-183.
  6. Blanchard, O. (2006). European unemployment: the evolution of facts and ideas. Economic Policy, January, Printed in Great Britain, 5-59,
  7. Duraisamy, P. (2002). Changes in returns to education in India, 1983–94: by gender, age-cohort and location. Economics of Education Review, 21, 609-622.
  8. Eagly, A. H. and Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
  9. Eagly, A. H. and Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: an evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807-834.
  10. Elmelech, Y. and Lu, H. H. (2004). Race, ethnicity. and the gender poverty gap. Social Science Research, 33, 158-182.
  11. European Commission. (2013). Tackling the Gender Pay Gap in the European Union. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-quality/files/gender_pay_gap/ 130422_gpg_brochure_en.pdf, (4.5.2014).
  12. European Commission. (2014). Taking stock of the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, Annexes 1 to 3, Retrieved from http:// ec.europa.eu/europe2020/documents/documents-and-reports/index_en.htm, (1.7.2014).
  13. Fetterolf, J. C. and Eagly, A.H. (2011). Do young women expect gender equality in their future lives? An answer from a possible selves experiment. Sex Roles, 6, 83-93.
  14. Foubert, P. (2011). Equal pay for men and women in europe anno 2011: the gender pay gap on the retreat?. European Gender Equality Law Review, 1, http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/ egelr__2011-1_en.pdf, (1.7.2014).
  15. Ghani, E., Kerr, W.R. and O‟Connell, S.D. (2013