SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Animal Health Production and Hygiene / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Polymerase chain reaction PCR inhibitors

Polimeraz Zincir reaksiyonu PZR İnhibitörleri

Dilek KULA
Sami GÖKPINAR
Pages
599–604
Publication Date
2018-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this review is to give information about the inhibitors that can be anticipated in the intended PCR studies and the precautions that should be taken to remove them.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Backround/Aim: Polymerase chain reaction PCR is a specific and sensitive molecular biological technique that has been used intensively in recent years in scientific studies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The formation of these inhibitors is a significant disadvantage of PCR.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this review is to give information about the inhibitors that can be anticipated in the intended PCR studies and the precautions that should be taken to remove them.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İnhibitör · Moleküler yöntemler · PZR

Abstract

Backround/Aim: Polymerase chain reaction PCR is a specific and sensitive molecular biological technique that has been used intensively in recent years in scientific studies. PCR is highly sensitive to inhibitors since it is an enzymatic reaction. The formation of these inhibitors is a significant disadvantage of PCR. Because the formation of inhibitors can affect the sensitivity of the results, as well as cause false negative results. The purpose of this review is to give information about the inhibitors that can be anticipated in the intended PCR studies and the precautions that should be taken to remove them.

Özet

Özbilgi/Amaç: Polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu PZR son yıllarda bilimsel çalışmalarda oldukça yoğun kullanılmaya başlanan özgül ve duyarlı bir moleküler biyolojik bir tekniktir. PZR, enzimatik bir reaksiyon olduğundan inhibitörlere karşı oldukça duyarlıdır. Bu inhibitörlerin oluşması PZR’ın önemli bir dezavantajıdır. Çünkü inhibitörlerin oluşması sonuçların duyarlılığını etkileyeceği gibi, yanlış negatif sonuçlara da neden olabilmektedir. Bu derleme’nin amacı PZR çalışmalarında karşımıza çıkabilecek inhibitörler ve bunların ortadan kaldırılmaları için alınması gereken önlemler hakkında bilgi verilmesidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KULA, D., GÖKPINAR, S. (2018). Polymerase chain reaction PCR inhibitors. Animal Health Production and Hygiene, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 599–604. https://ajindex.com/articles/733972

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abbaszadegan M, Huber MS, Gerba CP, Pepper IL. Detection of enteroviruses in groundwater with the polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993, 59, 1318–24.
  2. Abolmaaty A, Gu W, Witkowsky R, Levin RE. The use of activated charcoal for the removal of PCR inhibitors from oyster samples. J Microbiol Methods 2007, 68, 349–52.
  3. Al-Soud WA, Radström P. Capacity of nine thermostable DNA polymerases To mediate DNA amplification in the presence of PCRinhibiting samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998, 64, 3748–53.
  4. Al-Soud WA, Radström P. Effects of amplification facilitators on diagnostic PCR in the presence of blood, feces, and meat. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38, 4463–70.
  5. Al-Soud WA, Radström P. Purification and characterization of PCRinhibitory components in blood cells. J Clin Microbiol 2001, 39, 485–93.
  6. Al-Soud WA, Jonsson LJ, Radström P. Identification and characterization of immunoglobulin G in blood as a major inhibitor of diagnostic PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38, 345–50.
  7. Al-Soud WA, Ouis IS, Li DQ, Ljungh S, Wadstrom T. Characterization of the PZR inhibitory effect of bile to optimize real-time PCR detection of Helicobacter species. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2005, 44, 177–82.
  8. Arnal C, Ferre-Aubineau V, Besse B, Mignotte B, Schwartzbrod L, Billaudel S. Comparison of seven RNA extraction methods on stool and shellfish samples prior to hepatitis A virus amplification. J Virol Methods 1999, 77, 17–26.
  9. Atmar RL, Metcalf TG, Neill FH, Estes MK. Detection of enteric viruses in oysters by using the polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993, 59, 631–5.
  10. Atmar RL, Neill FH, Romalde JL, Le Guyader F, Woodley CM, Metcalf TG, Estes MK. Detection of Norwalk virus and hepatitis A virus in shellfish tissues with the PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995, 61, 3014–8.
  11. Baar C, D’abbadie M, Vaisman A, Arana ME, Hofreiter M, Woodgate R, Kunkel TA, Holliger P. Molecular breeding of polymerases for resistance to environmental inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39, e51. Belec L, Authier J, Eliezer-Vanerot MC, Piedouillet C, Mohamed AS, Gherardi RK. Myoglobin as a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitor: a limitation for PCR from skeletal muscle tissue avoided by the use of Thermus thermophilus polymerase. Muscle Nerve 1998, 21, 1064–7.
  12. Bergallo M, Costa C, Gribaudo G, Tarallo S, Baro S, Negro PA, Cavallo R. Evaluation of six methods for extraction and purification of viral DNA from urine and serum samples. New Microbiol 2006, 29, 111– 9. Bessetti J. An introduction t