SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Animal Health Production and Hygiene / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Food Defense

Gıda Savunması

Gamze TURKAL
A. Ezgi TELLİ
Yusuf DOĞRUER
Pages
609–615
Publication Date
2019-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is thought that studies with systems will be beneficial such as CARVER + Shock Criticality, Accessibility, Recuperability, Vulnerability, Effect, Recognizability + Shock software and evaluation of operational risk issues to reduce potential threats against hazards in food defense.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/Aim: Food defense, which is expressed as a struggle against intentional contamination, threatens public health as well as its economic damage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Intentional actions are illogical actions that are difficult to predict.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is thought that studies with systems will be beneficial such as CARVER + Shock Criticality, Accessibility, Recuperability, Vulnerability, Effect, Recognizability + Shock software and evaluation of operational risk issues to reduce potential threats against hazards in food defense.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Gıda güvenliği · gıda savunması · kasıtlı kontaminasyon

Abstract

Background/Aim: Food defense, which is expressed as a struggle against intentional contamination, threatens public health as well as its economic damage. Intentional actions are illogical actions that are difficult to predict. For this reason, the food defense system is carried out according to a specific plan. Conclusion: Food defense practices are an inevitable step in strengthening the entire food safety system. It is therefore important to raise awareness of food defense in the food industry. It is thought that studies with systems will be beneficial such as CARVER + Shock Criticality, Accessibility, Recuperability, Vulnerability, Effect, Recognizability + Shock software and evaluation of operational risk issues to reduce potential threats against hazards in food defense.

Özet

Özbilgi/Amaç: Kasıtlı kontaminasyona karşı mücadele şeklinde ifade edilen gıda savunması, ekonomik olarak zarar vermenin yanı sıra halk sağlığını da tehdit etmektedir. Kasıtlı eylemler önceden tahmin edilmesi zor olan mantık dışı eylemlerdir. Bu nedenle gıda savunma sistemi belirli bir plan dahilinde yürütülmektedir. Sonuç: Gıda savunması uygulamaları tüm gıda güvenliği sisteminin güçlendirilmesinde kaçınılmaz bir adımdır. Bu yüzden gıda endüstrisinde gıda savunması bilincini artırmak önemlidir. Gıda savunmasında tehlikelere karşı potansiyel tehditlerin azaltılması için operasyonel risk konularının değerlendirilmesi, CARVER+Shock Criticality, Accessibility, Recuperability, Vulnerability, Effect, Recognizability + Shock, Kritiklik, Erişilebilirlik, Telafi Edilebilirlik, Güvenlik Açığı, Etki, Tanınabilirlik + Şok yazılımı gibi sistemlerle yapılan çalışmaların fayda sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURKAL, G., TELLİ, A. E., DOĞRUER, Y. (2019). Food Defense. Animal Health Production and Hygiene, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 609–615. https://ajindex.com/articles/733964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Applebaum RS (2004). Terrorism and the na� on’s Food supply perspec� ves of the Food industry: Where we are, what we have, and what we need. Journal of Food Science, 69(2), 48-50.
  2. Biegel B, Beach K (2010).
  3. Global food defense. AIB Update, March/April. h� ps://www.aibinterna� onal.com/aibonline_/www.aibonline.org/ newsletter/Magazine/Mar_Apr2010/7GlobalFoodDefense.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 03 Nisan 2018).
  4. Bogadi NP, Banović M, Babić I (2016). Food defence system in food industry: perspec� ve of the EU countries. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmi� elsicherheit, 11(3), 217-226. Bri� sh Standards Ins� tu� on (BSI) (2014). PAS 96:2014 Guide to protec� ng and defending food and drink deliberate a� ack. h� ps:// www.bsigroup.com/LocalFiles/en-MY/PAS%2096%20Food%20 Defence/PAS%2096%20(2014).pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 03 Nisan 2018).
  5. Burrows WD, Renner SE (1999). Biological warfare agents as threats to potable water. Environmental HGealth Perspec� ves, 107(12), 975- 984. Busta FFF, Kennedy SP (2011). Defending the safety of the global food system from inten� onal contamina� on in a changing market. In: Advances in Food Protec� on, Hefnawy M (Eds.), Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 119-135.
  6. Dalziel GR (2009). Food defense incidents: 1950-2008. A chronology and analysis of incidents involving the maliciuos contamina� on of the food supply chain, Centre of Excellence For Na� onal Security (CENS), S. Rajaratnam School of Interna� onal Studies, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore. h� p://m.food-defense.it/1/ upload/rsis_food_defence_170209.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 3 Ekim 2018).
  7. Darling RG, Woods JB, Dembek ZF (2004). USAMRIID’s medical management of biological casual� es handbook. United States Army Medical Research Ins� tute of Infec� ous Diseases USAMRIID. Food Drug and Administra� on (FDA) (2017). Mi� ga� on strategies to protect food against ınten� onal adultera� on: what you need to know about the fda regula� on: guidance for ındustry small en� ty compliance guide. h� ps://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/ GuidanceRegula� on/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInforma� on/ UCM562223.pdf. (Erişim Tarihi: 03 Ekim 2018). Federal Register 2013. Focused mi� ga� on strategies to protect food against inten� onal adultera� on part III. Fed Regist, 78(247), 78013– 78061. pdf/2013-30373.pdf. Erişim Tarihi: 30 Mayıs 2018.
  8. Fredrickson NR (2014). Food security: food defense and biosecurity. In: Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, Volume 1, Van Alfen NK (Eds.), Academic Press, USA, pp.