Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The effectiveness of concomitant intravaginal laser treatment in patients undergoing mesh excision due to vaginal exposure or extrusion

Pages
64–69
Publication Date
2022-01-24
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Concomitant laser treatment applied with the mesh excision for the treatment of vaginal meshexposure or extrusion secondary to TOT surgery provides a significant advantage in preventing the recurrence of SUI.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To investigate the efficacy of intravaginal laser therapy applied concurrently with mesh excision for the treatment of vaginal polypropylene mesh exposure or extrusion, which is the most common complication after transobturator tape (TOT), on the recurrence of incontinence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The data of 49 patients who underwent mesh excision due to vaginal mesh exposure or extrusion in our clinic between January 2009 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Concomitant laser treatment applied with the mesh excision for the treatment of vaginal meshexposure or extrusion secondary to TOT surgery provides a significant advantage in preventing the recurrence of SUI.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Laser therapy · mesh erosion · incontinence recurrence

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of intravaginal laser therapy applied concurrently with mesh excision for the treatment of vaginal polypropylene mesh exposure or extrusion, which is the most common complication after transobturator tape (TOT), on the recurrence of incontinence. Material and Method: The data of 49 patients who underwent mesh excision due to vaginal mesh exposure or extrusion in our clinic between January 2009 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups as simultaneous intravaginal laser therapy during the mesh excision (EL, n=23) and only mesh excision (EO, n=26). Data of the patients and long-term stress urinary incontinence (SUI) recurrence rates were determined and the groups were compared. Results: The mean age of the patients was 50.4±9.9 years and the mean follow-up period was 33.3±22.1 months. SUI recurrence in 1-h pad test was significantly lower in the EL group than the EO group at the 12 th month evaluation (8.7% vs 34.6% p=0.030 respectively). According to multivariate regression analysis operation type was an independent risk factor for SUI recurrence (p=0.021). However, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of postoperative incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL) scores (p=0.082). Conclusion: Concomitant laser treatment applied with the mesh excision for the treatment of vaginal meshexposure or extrusion secondary to TOT surgery provides a significant advantage in preventing the recurrence of SUI.

🔖

Cite This Article

SARIKAYA, K., ŞENOCAK, Ç., İBİŞ, M. A., SADİOĞLU, F. E., ÇİFTÇİ, M., BOZKURT, Ö. F. (2022). The effectiveness of concomitant intravaginal laser treatment in patients undergoing mesh excision due to vaginal exposure or extrusion. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 64–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/733790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Takahashi S, Takei M, Nishizawa O, et al. Clinical guidelines for female lower urinary tract symptoms. Tokyo: The Neurogenic Bladder Society; 2013: 6–168. Jarvis GJ. Surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 371–4.
  2. Henriksson L, Ulmsten U. A urodynamic evaluation of the effects of abdominal urethrocystopexy and vaginal sling urethroplasty in women with stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 131: 77–82. Keršič M, Keršič M, Kunič T, et al. Single-incision mini-sling for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: is it actually inferior to transobturator vaginal tape and tension-free vaginal tape? Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2020; 9: 123-30.
  3. Kenton K, Stoddard AM, Zyczynski H, et al. 5-year longitudinal follow-up after retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings the urinary incontinence treatment network. J Urol 2015; 193: 203–10.
  4. Ramart P, Ackerman AL, Cohen SA, Kim JH, Raz S. The risk of recurrent urinary incontinence requiring surgery after suburethral sling removal for mesh complications. Urology 2017; 106: 203-9. Fistonić N.Fistonić I.Guštek Š.F et al.Minimally invasive, non-ablative Er:YAG laser treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women–a pilot study.Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31: 635-43.
  5. Pardo J, Sola VR, Morale AA. Treatment of female stress urinary incontinence with Erbium-YAG laser in non-ablative mode. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016; 204: 1-4. Swift S. Current opinion on the classification and definition of genital tract prolapse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 14: 503-7.
  6. Orgensen L, Lose G, Anders J. One-hour pad weighing test for objective assessment of female incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 39-43.
  7. Eyigor S, Karapolat H, Akkoc Y, Yesil H, Ekmekci O. Quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis and urinary disorders: reliability and validity of Turkish-language version of Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. J Rehabil Res Dev 2010; 47: 67-71.
  8. Burkhard FC, Bosch JLHR, Cruz F et al. EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Copenhagen 2018. ISBN 978-94-92671-01-1. 2018.
  9. Niknejad K, Plzak LS, 3rd, Staskin DR, Loughlin KR. Autologous and synthetic urethral slings for female incontinence. Urol Clin North Am 2002; 29: 597-611.
  10. Gomes CM, Carvalho FL, Bellucci CHS, et al. Update on complications of synthetic suburethral slings. Int Braz J Urol. 2017; 43: 822-34.
  11. Berger AA, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA. Long-term risk of reoperation after synthetic mesh midurethral sling s