Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Early surgical repair or conservative treatment? Comparing patients with penile fracture concerning long-term sexual functions

Pages
249–254
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, early surgical repair should be considered in the foreground, especially in patients with a large rupture area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: To compare the patients who underwent early surgical repair of penile fracture, which is one of the urological emergencies, and patients who recovered with conservative treatment concerning long-term sexual functions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: The data of 42 patients who applied to our clinic with penile fracture between January 2010 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, early surgical repair should be considered in the foreground, especially in patients with a large rupture area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the patients who underwent early surgical repair of penile fracture, which is one of the urological emergencies, and patients who recovered with conservative treatment concerning long-term sexual functions. METHODS: The data of 42 patients who applied to our clinic with penile fracture between January 2010 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were categorized into two groups as early operated and followed-up conservatively. The preoperative and postoperative findings of the patients were compared with the International Erectile Function Scale (IIEF-6) scores in the long-term follow-up. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 35 (20–65) years and the median follow-up period was 52 (8–120) months. The postoperative mean IIEF-6 score of the patients was 22.98±6.52. There was no significant difference between the surgical and the conservative groups concerning postoperative complications (p=0.460). In the follow-up period, the presence of palpable plaque on the rupture area was significantly higher in the conservative group (p=0.041). However, there was no significant difference between the groups concerning IIEF-6 scores (p=0.085). CONCLUSION: Although there is no significant difference in long-term IIEF-6 scores between the two groups, the rate of palpable plaque formation is higher in patients followed-up conservatively. Therefore, early surgical repair should be considered in the foreground, especially in patients with a large rupture area.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENOCAK, Ç., BOZKURT, Ö. F., SARIKAYA, K., SADİOĞLU, F. E., ÇİFTÇİ, M. (2022). Early surgical repair or conservative treatment? Comparing patients with penile fracture concerning long-term sexual functions. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 249–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/644096

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Mazaris EM, Livadas K, Chalikopoulos D, Bisas A, Deliveliotis C, Skolarikos A. Penile fractures: immediate surgical approach with a midline ventral incision. BJU Int 2009;104:520−3
  2. Amer T, Wilson R, Chlosta P, AlBuheissi S, Qazi H, Fraser M, et al. Penile Fracture: A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int 2016;96:315−29
  3. Kamdar C, Mooppan UM, Kim H, Gulmi FA. Penile fracture: preoperative evaluation and surgical technique for optimal patient outcome. BJU Int 2008;102:1640−4
  4. Falcone M, Garaffa G, Castiglione F, Ralph DJ. Current Management of Penile Fracture: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:253−60
  5. Beilan JA, Wallen JJ, Baumgarten AS, Morgan KN, Parker JL, Carrion RE. Intralesional Injection of Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum May Increase the Risk of Late-Onset Penile Fracture. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:272−8
  6. Mydlo JH, Hayyeri M, Macchia RJ. Urethrography and cavernosography imaging in a small series of penile fractures: a comparison with surgical findings. Urology 1998;51:616−9
  7. Gupta N, Goyal P, Sharma K, Bansal I, Gupta S, Li S, et al. Penile fracture: role of ultrasound. Transl Androl Urol 2017;6:580−4
  8. Kitrey ND, Djakovic N, Hallscheidt P, Kuehhas FE, Lumen N, Serafetinidis E, et al. EAU Guidelines presented at the EAU Annual Congress Copenhagen 2018. Available from:
  9. Thompson RF. Rupture of the penis. J Urol 1954;71:226
  10. Gedik A, Kayan D, Yamiş S, Yılmaz Y, Bircan K. The diagnosis and treatment of penile fracture: our 19-year experience. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2011;17:57−60
  11. Wong NC, Dason S, Bansal RK, Davies TO, Braga LH. Can it wait? A systematic review of immediate vs. delayed surgical repair of penile fractures. Can Urol Assoc J 2017;11:53−60
  12. Gamal WM, Osman MM, Hammady A, Aldahshoury MZ, Hussein MM, Saleem M. Penile fracture: long-term results of surgical and conservative management. J Trauma 2011;71:491−3
  13. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Peña BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 1999;11:319−26
  14. Malis J, Zur K. Der fractura penis. Arch Klin Chir 1924;129:651. [Article in German] 15. Barros R, Schulze L, Ornellas AA, Koifman L, Favorito LA. Relationship between sexual position and severity of penile fracture. Int J Impot Res 2017;29:207−9.