Journals / Anatolian Current Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 6

Correction: Factors associated with maxillary sinus alveolar crest pneumatization: age, septa, nasal septum deviation, and root-sinus relationships

Factors associated with maxillary sinus alveolar crest pneumatization: age, septa, nasal septum deviation, and root-sinus relationships

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Root-sinus proximity showed a strong unadjusted association.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: To identify factors independently associated with extensive maxillary sinus alveolar crest pneumatization on computed tomography (CT) in a cross-sectional sample.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 800 maxillary quadrants from 400 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Root-sinus proximity showed a strong unadjusted association.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Maxillary sinus · molar · third

Abstract

Aims: To identify factors independently associated with extensive maxillary sinus alveolar crest pneumatization on computed tomography (CT) in a cross-sectional sample. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 800 maxillary quadrants from 400 patients. Pneumatization was classified as normal or extensive, and its associations with demographic, dental, and sinonasal variables were tested by multivariable logistic regression with cluster-robust standard errors. Intra- and inter-observer agreement was quantified on a random subsample of 82 quadrants. Generalized estimating equations and penalized-likelihood (Firth) regression were used as sensitivity analyses. Results: Extensive pneumatization was present in 603 quadrants (75.4%) and was independently associated with age [odds ratio (OR) 0.932 per year; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.908-0.957; p<0.001], maxillary septa (OR 2.235; 95% CI 1.257-3.975; p=0.006), and nasal septum deviation (OR 2.864; 95% CI 1.467-5.594; p=0.002). Tooth count, third molar presence, gender, and ostiomeatal complex patency were not. The model showed modest discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.681; 95% CI 0.636-0.725). Where a root apex projected into the sinus, 88.8% of quadrants showed extensive pneumatization, compared with 58.3% where the roots were distant from the sinus floor. Conclusion: Extensive maxillary sinus pneumatization is more frequent in younger patients and is independently associated with maxillary septa and nasal septum deviation, rather than with tooth count; the association with maxillary septa was attenuated in a generalized estimating equations sensitivity analysis. Root-sinus proximity showed a strong unadjusted association.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kahraman, E. N., Tekin, B., Yurdaışık, I. (2026). Correction: Factors associated with maxillary sinus alveolar crest pneumatization: age, septa, nasal septum deviation, and root-sinus relationships. Anatolian Current Medical Journal, Volume: 8 Issue: 6. https://ajindex.com/articles/1667888

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Lim HC, Kim S, Kim DH, Herr Y, Chung JH, Shin SI. Factors affecting maxillary sinus pneumatization following posterior maxillary tooth extraction. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021;51(4):285-295. doi:10.5051/jpis.2007220361
  2. Abdalla MA. Human maxillary sinus development, pneumatization, anatomy, blood supply, innervation and functional theories: an update review. Siriraj Med J. 2022;74(7):472-479. doi:10.33192/Smj.2022.56
  3. Alqahtani S, Alsheraimi A, Alshareef A, et al. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2020;12(1):e6611. doi:10.7759/cureus.6611
  4. Cavalcanti MC, Guirado TE, Sapata VM, et al. Maxillary sinus floor pneumatization and alveolar ridge resorption after tooth loss: a cross-sectional study. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e64. doi:10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2018.vol32.0064
  5. Lawson W, Patel ZM, Lin FY. The development and pathologic processes that influence maxillary sinus pneumatization. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2008;291(11):1554-1563. doi:10.1002/ar.20774
  6. Alshamrani AM, Mubarki M, Alsager AS, Alsharif HK, AlHumaidan SA, Al-Omar A. Maxillary sinus lift procedures: an overview of current techniques, presurgical evaluation, and complications. Cureus. 2023; 15(11):e49553. doi:10.7759/cureus.49553
  7. Saleh MHA, Sabri H, Di Pietro N, et al. Clinical indications and outcomes of sinus floor augmentation with bone substitutes: an evidence-based review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025;27(1):e13400. doi:10.1111/cid.13400
  8. Aalam AA, Krivitsky A, Kurtzman GM. Decision making with zygomatic and pterygoid dental implants in the severely atrophic maxilla: a narrative review. Dent Rev. 2022;2(3):100054. doi:10.1016/j.dentre.2022.100054
  9. Khorshed KAA, Elgamal M, Haggag MA, ELsyad MA. Closed sinus lift and fixed prostheses versus implant-assisted overdentures in management of atrophied distal extension maxillary ridges: a one-year randomized clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(6):1503.e1-1503.e8. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.035
  10. Ke Y, Xuan G. Does sinus membrane thickness influence the risk of perforation during lateral sinus lift surgery for dental implants? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2024;29(4):e568-e574. doi:10.4317/medoral.26545
  11. Lyu M, Xu D, Zhang X, Yuan Q. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a review of current evidence on anatomical factors and a decision tree. Int J Oral Sci. 2023;15(1):41. doi:10.1038/s41368-023-00248-x
  12. Dudde F, Barbarewicz F, Henkel KO. Risk factor analysis for perioperative complications in impacted third molar surgery-a single center experience. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;28(3):1127-1138. doi:10.1007/s10006-024-01232-3
  13. Constantine S, Clark B, Kiermeier A, Anderson PP. Panoramic radiography is of limited value in the evaluation of maxillary sinus disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019;127(3):237-246. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2018.10.005
  14. Tadinada A, Fung K, Thacker S, Mahdian M, Jadhav A, Schincaglia GP. Radiographic evaluation of the maxillary sinus prior to dental implant therapy: a comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional radiographic imaging. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015;45(3):169-174. doi:10.5624/isd.2015.45.3.169
  15. Morgan N, Meeus J, Shujaat S, Cortellini S, Bornstein MM, Jacobs R. CBCT for diagnostics, treatment planning and monitoring of sinus floor elevation procedures. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(10):1684. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13101684
  16. Shokri A, Lari S, Yousefi F, Hashemi L. Assessment of the relationship between the maxillary sinus floor and maxillary posterior teeth roots using cone beam computed tomography. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014; 15(5):618-622. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1589
  17. Weiss R 2nd, Read-Fuller A. Cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery: an evidence-based review. Dent J (Basel). 2019;7(2):52. doi:10.3390/dj7020052
  18. Schriber M, Bornstein MM, Suter VGA. Is the pneumatisation of the maxillary sinus following tooth loss a reality? A retrospective analysis using cone beam computed tomography and a customised software program. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(3):1349-1358. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2552-5
  19. Keceli HG, Dursun E, Dolgun A, et al. Evaluation of single tooth loss to maxillary sinus and surrounding bone anatomy with cone-beam computed tomography: a multicenter study. Implant Dent. 2017;26(5): 690-699. doi:10.1097/ID.0000000000000652
  20. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573-577. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010
  21. Archer WH. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 5th ed. Saunders; 1975.
  22. Wu X, Cai Q, Huang D, Xiong P, Shi L. Cone-beam computed tomography-based analysis of maxillary sinus pneumatization extended into the alveolar process in different age groups. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):393. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02445-2
  23. Evlice B, Duyan H. Maksiller üçüncü molar dişlerin konumu ve maksiller sinüsle ilişkisinin KIBT ile değerlendirilmesi. Akdeniz Med J. 2021;7(2):307-314. doi:10.53394/akd.958922
  24. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174.
  25. Nowak R, Mehlis G. Studies on the state of pneumatization of the sinus maxillaris. Anat Anz. 1975;138(3):143-151.
  26. Jun BC, Song SW, Park CS, Lee DH, Cho KJ, Cho JH. The analysis of maxillary sinus aeration according to aging process; volume assessment by 3-dimensional reconstruction by high-resolutional CT scanning. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132(3):429-434. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.11.012
  27. Krennmair G, Ulm CW, Lugmayr H, Solar P. The incidence, location, and height of maxillary sinus septa in the edentulous and dentate maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57(6):667-671. doi:10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90427-5
  28. Purohit N, Dighraskar C, Singh A, et al. Prevalence of maxillary sinus septa and its impact on sinus augmentation procedures for implant placement. Bioinformation. 2025;21(5):1123-1127. doi:10.6026/973206300211123
  29. Dandekeri SS, Hegde C, Kavassery P, Sowmya MK, Shetty B. CBCT study of morphologic variations of maxillary sinus septa in relevance to sinus augmentation procedures. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2020;10(1):51-56. doi:10.4103/ams.ams_141_19
  30. Ağcayazı S, Salcan I, Erşahan AA, Seçkin E. Sinonasal anatomic variations in the adult population: CT examination of 1200 patients. Niger J Clin Pract. 2024;27(8):990-994. doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp_275_24
  31. Gruszka K, Aksoy S, Różyło-Kalinowska I, Gülbeş MM, Kalinowski P, Orhan K. A comparative study of paranasal sinus and nasal cavity anatomic variations between the Polish and Turkish Cypriot population with CBCT. Head Face Med. 2022;18(1):37. doi:10.1186/s13005-022-00340-3
  32. Stevanovic Sancar B, Şendişçi Gök R, Tercanlı Alkış H. Prevalences of concha bullosa and nasal septum pneumatization and their relationship with nasal septum deviation in cone-beam computed tomography. Eur Oral Res. 2025;59(2):114-120. doi:10.26650/eor.20241339846
  33. Orhan I, Ormeci T, Aydin S, et al. Morphometric analysis of the maxillary sinus in patients with nasal septum deviation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(4):727-732. doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2617-7
  34. Kalabalık F, Tarım Ertaş E. Investigation of maxillary sinus volume relationships with nasal septal deviation, concha bullosa, and impacted or missing teeth using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2019;35(3):287-295. doi:10.1007/s11282-018-0360-x
  35. Sapmaz E, Kavaklı A, Sapmaz HI, Ögetürk M. Impact of hard palate angulation caused by septal deviation on maxillary sinus volume. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;56(2):75-80. doi:10.5152/tao.2018.2987
  36. Atsal G, Demir E, Yildirim O, Edizer DT, Olgun L. The relationship between degree of nasal septum deviation with sinonasal structures and variations. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(5):e447-e449. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000008274
  37. Aşantoğrol F, Coşgunarslan A. The effect of anatomical variations of the sinonasal region on maxillary sinus volume and dimensions: a three-dimensional study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): S118-S127. doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.05.001
  38. Tassoker M, Magat G, Lale B, Gulec M, Ozcan S, Orhan K. Is the maxillary sinus volume affected by concha bullosa, nasal septal deviation, and impacted teeth? A CBCT study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(1): 227-233. doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05651-x
  39. Göksel S, Güler AY. Is there a relationship between maxillary sinus's inferior pneumatisation and sinonasal variations? A retrospective CBCT study. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2023;14(3):e3. doi:10.5037/jomr.2023.14303
  40. Açar G, Gökşan AS, Magat G. Three-dimensional CBCT analysis of how sinonasal variations affect maxillary sinus volume in individuals with different skeletal malocclusion. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):34040. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-13624-w
  41. Açar G, Gökşan AS, Aydoğdu D. Assessment of the impact of nasal septum deviation types on sinonasal variations and infundibulum morphometry in relation to gender and age using CT images. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1729. doi:10.1186/s12903-025-07128-2
  42. Sadry S, Ok U, Özdaş DÖ. Is there a relationship of nasal septum deviation with pharyngeal airway dimension and craniocervical posture? Cranio. 2024;42(4):461-469. doi:10.1080/08869634.2021.1995223
  43. Şahin MM, Özer H, Çayönü M, et al. The relationship between nasal septal deviation and paranasal pneumatization. J Craniofac Surg. 2020; 31(3):e285-e288. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006266