Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Complications and Patient Satisfaction With 4 İmplant-Supported Bar-Clips Retained Mandibular Overdentures

Dişsiz Alt Çeneye Uygulanan 4 İmplant Destekli Bar Tutuculu Hareketli Protezlerde Komplikasyonların ve Hasta Memnuniyetinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
581–589
Publication Date
2010-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients indicated on a visual analogue scale satisfaction with the prosthesis comfort, apperance, function, speech, cleaning easiness and overall satisfaction at 1 week after prothesis insertion baseline , first and second years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this preliminary report was to review the prosthetic complications and patient satisfaction with 4 implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained by bar-clips attachments opposing to conventional dentures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Eighteen patients treated with 4 implant-supported mandibular overdentures and maxillary dentures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients indicated on a visual analogue scale satisfaction with the prosthesis comfort, apperance, function, speech, cleaning easiness and overall satisfaction at 1 week after prothesis insertion baseline , first and second years.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dişsiz alt çene · implant · barklips tutucu

Abstract

The purpose of this preliminary report was to review the prosthetic complications and patient satisfaction with 4 implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained by bar-clips attachments opposing to conventional dentures. Eighteen patients treated with 4 implant-supported mandibular overdentures and maxillary dentures. The patients were followed-up for 2 years. During the followup period, prosthodontic complications/repairs were recorded. Patients indicated on a visual analogue scale satisfaction with the prosthesis comfort, apperance, function, speech, cleaning easiness and overall satisfaction at 1 week after prothesis insertion baseline , first and second years. The change in patient satisfaction with the time was analyzed using Wilcoxon test p

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı dişsiz alt çenede 4 implant ile desteklenen bar tutuculu hareketli ve üst çenede tam protez uygulanan hastalarda protetik komplikasyonların ve hasta memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesidir. Onsekiz dişsiz hasta alt çenede 4 implant destekli bar tutuculu ve üst çenede tam protez ile tedavi edildi. Hastalar 2 yıl boyunca düzenli kontrollere çağrıldı. Takip süresi boyunca görülen protetik komplikasyonlar ve tamirler kaydedildi. Hastaların protezlerinin rahatlığı, estetiği, fonksiyonu, konuşma rahatlığı, temizleme kolaylığı ve genel memnuniyetleri vizuel analog skala üzerinde işaretleme yapmaları sağlanarak ölçüldü. Ölçümler protez tesliminin 1 hafta başlangıç , 1 ve 2 yıl sonrasındaki kontrollerde uygulandı. Hasta memnuniyetinde başlangıçtan 1 ve 2 yıl sonra zamanla bir değişiklik olup olmadığı Wilcoxon testi p

🔖

Cite This Article

NEMLİ, S. K., BOYNUEĞRİ, D. (2010). Complications and Patient Satisfaction With 4 İmplant-Supported Bar-Clips Retained Mandibular Overdentures. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 581–589. https://ajindex.com/articles/728918

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Allen PF, McMillan AS, Walshaw D.A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional com- plete dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 85: 141-147, 2001.
  2. Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Piehslinger E. The influ- ence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosth- odontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures sup- ported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 21: 514-520, 2008.
  3. Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 11(Suppl 1): 108-125, 2000.
  4. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP.A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible. Int. J. Prostho- dont. 15: 65-72, 2002.
  5. Alsabeeha N, Payne AG, De Silva RK, Swain MV.Mandibular single-implant overdentures: a review with surgical and prosthodontic perspectives of a novel approach. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 20: 356-365, 2009.
  6. Alsabeeha NH, De Silva RK, Thomson WM, Payne AG. Primary stability measurements of single implants in the midline of the edentulous mandible for overdentures. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 21: 563-566, 2010. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc, 1993, 669-684 Sadowsky SJ. The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch: deign considerations. J. Prosthet. Dent. 78: 28-33, 1997.
  7. Simon H, Yanase RT. Terminology for implant prostheses. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 18: 539-543, 2003.
  8. Chaffee NR, Felton DA, Cooper LF, Palmqvist U, Smith R. Prosthetic complications in an implant-retained man- dibular overdenture population: initial analysis of a pro- spective study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 87: 40-44, 2002.
  9. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int. J. Oral Max- illofac. Implants. 5: 347-359, 1990.
  10. Ekelund JA, Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: a prospective study on Brånemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int. J. Prosthodont. 16: 602-608, 2003.
  11. Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S, Grippaudo G. A long- term follow-up study of non-submerged ITI implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Part I: Ten-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 1286 implants. Clin. Oral. Implants Res. 13:260-273, 2002.
  12. Eliasson A, Palmqvist S, Svenson B, Sondell K. Five-year results with fixed complete-arch mandibular prostheses supp