Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Usage Of The Three Dimensional Imaging Systems In Intraoral Implant Planning

İntraoral İmplant Planlamasında Üç Boyutlu Görüntüleme Tekniklerinin Kullanımı

Pages
564–573
Publication Date
2010-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of the this literature review is to give contemporary informations about the usage of the three dimensional imaging systems in intraoral implant planning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Success of the implant treatments does not depend on only improvements of the implant materials properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this support, using three dimensional imaging systems such as CT, CBCT and MRI in implant planning, provides the accurate insertion of the implants to patient and to do a succeeded prosthese biomechanically, esthetically, phonetically and functionally .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of the this literature review is to give contemporary informations about the usage of the three dimensional imaging systems in intraoral implant planning.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:implant planlaması · üç boyutlu görüntüleme sistemleri · implant planning

Abstract

Success of the implant treatments does not depend on only improvements of the implant materials properties. The important facts for success of the implant treatment are planning of the implants according to the available bone features and prosthetic rehabilitation that we plan to do and appropriate surgery to this plan. For this support, using three dimensional imaging systems such as CT, CBCT and MRI in implant planning, provides the accurate insertion of the implants to patient and to do a succeeded prosthese biomechanically, esthetically, phonetically and functionally . Besides, by using the three dimensional datas, streolitographic templates, stereolitographic models and prosthetic frameworks can be produced. The purpose of the this literature review is to give contemporary informations about the usage of the three dimensional imaging systems in intraoral implant planning.

Özet

İmplant tedavilerinin başarısı sadece implant materyallerinin özelliklerinin gelişmesine bağlanamaz. Mevcut kemiğin durumuna ve yapılacak olan protetik rehabilitasyona göre implantların planlanması ve bu plana uygun cerrahi işlem başarının önemli faktörleridir. Bu amaçla BT, CBBT ve MRG gibi üç boyutlu görüntüleme sistemlerinin implant planlamasında kullanımı, implantların en doğru şekilde hastaya yerleştirilmesini ve biyomekanik, estetik, fonetik ve fonksiyonel açıdan başarılı bir protez yapılmasını sağlar. Ayrıca üç boyutlu veriler yardımıyla stereolitografik cerrahi plaklar, stereolitografik modeller ve protetik iskeletler üretilebilmektedir.Bu literatür derlemesinin amacı, üç boyutlu görüntüleme sistemlerinin intraoral implant planlamasında kullanımı hakkında güncel bilgiler vermektir

🔖

Cite This Article

BANKOĞLU, M., NEMLİ, S. K. (2010). Usage Of The Three Dimensional Imaging Systems In Intraoral Implant Planning. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 564–573. https://ajindex.com/articles/728916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Xiaojun C, Yanping L, Yiqun W, Chengtao W. Compu- ter-aided oral implantology: methods and applications. J Med Eng Technol. 31(6): 459-467; 2007.
  2. BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, Steenberghe D. Ima- ging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res. 4(3): 156-172; 2002. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and Iimitations associ- ated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent. 79: 74- 78; 1998. Stanford CM. Biomechanical and functional behaviour of implants. Adv Dent Res. 13:88-92; 1999.
  3. Miller RJ, Bier J. Surgical navigation in oral implantology. Implant Dent. 15(1): 41-47; 2006.
  4. Tal H, Moses O. Comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 20:40-42; 1991.
  5. Mupparapu M, Singer SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc. 70(1): 32a-g; 2004.
  6. Lofthag-Hansen S, Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-Beam CT for preoperative implant planning in posterior man- dible: visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin Impl Dent Re- lat Res.11(3): 246-255; 2008.
  7. Tyndall DA, Brooks SL, Arbor A. Selection criteria for den- tal implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 89(5): 630- 637; 2000. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. Third edition. Mosby Elsevier. Los Angeles, California; 2007.
  8. Çakur B, Sümbüllü MA, Harorlı A. Operasyon önce- si implant yerlerinin belirlenmesinde radyolojik kriterler ve radyolojik teknik seçimi. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 17(2); 23-30; 2007. Reiskin AB. Implant Planning, status, controversies, and new developments. Dent Clin N Am. 42(1): 47-56; 1998. Babbush CA. Implants; principles and practice. WB Sa- unders Company. 1991.
  9. Jabero M, Sarment DP. Advanced surgical guidance te- chnology: a review. Implant Dent. 15: 135-142; 2006.
  10. Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer- aided imp- lant surgery- a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 21: 305-313; 2006.
  11. Azari A, Nikzad S. Computer- assisted implantology: historical background and potential outcomes- a review. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg.4: 95-104; 2008. Ganz SD. Computer-aided design/ computer aided ma- nufacturing applications using ct and cone beam CT scan- ning technology. Dent Clin N Am. 52: 777-808; 2008.
  12. Widmann G, Widmann R, Widmann E, Jaschke W, Bale R. Use of a surgical navigation system for CT- guided template produc