Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Current Applications of Gingival Retraction

Güncel Gingival Retraksiyon Uygulamaları

Pages
1095–1104
Publication Date
2012-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The aim of this review is to provide knowledge in details about the current gingival retraction materials and methods used in making impressions of the tooth and implant supported crown and bridge prostheses

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Marginal fit is one of the most important factors that influences long term success of tooth and implant supported crown and bridge prostheses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Gingival retraction is a procedure that separates gingiva temporarily from tooth in lateral and vertical directions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The aim of this review is to provide knowledge in details about the current gingival retraction materials and methods used in making impressions of the tooth and implant supported crown and bridge prostheses
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Retraksiyon · marjin · doğal diş

Abstract

Marginal fit is one of the most important factors that influences long term success of tooth and implant supported crown and bridge prostheses. For this reason, it is essential to make the precise impression of the margin by retracting the gingival tissues around the prepared tooth or implant abutment. Gingival retraction is a procedure that separates gingiva temporarily from tooth in lateral and vertical directions. In literature, there are many materials and methods related to the retraction of gingival tissues. Clinician should make the appropriate selection according to the status of case. The aim of this review is to provide knowledge in details about the current gingival retraction materials and methods used in making impressions of the tooth and implant supported crown and bridge prostheses

Özet

Diş ve implant destekli kron ve köprü protezlerinde kenar uyumu restorasyonun uzun süreli başarısını etkileyen en önemli faktörlerden birisidir. Bu nedenle prepare edilmiş diş veya abutmentin implant desteği çevresindeki gingival dokuların retrakte edilerek kenar bitim çizgisinin net ölçüsünün alınması gerekir. Gingival retraksiyon, dişetinin dişten lateral ve vertikal yönlerde geçici olarak uzaklaştırılması işlemidir. Literatürde gingival dokuların retraksiyonu ile ilgili birçok materyal ve yöntem mevcuttur. Diş hekimi en uygun seçimi vakanın durumuna göre yapmalıdır. Bu derlemenin amacı, günümüzde diş ve implant destekli kron ve köprü protezlerinin ölçülerinde kullanılan güncel gingival retraksiyon materyal ve yöntemleri hakkında detaylı bilgi verilmesidir

🔖

Cite This Article

KURT, M., BAL, B. T., ASAR, N. V. (2012). Current Applications of Gingival Retraction. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 1095–1104. https://ajindex.com/articles/728859

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Kamath R., Sarandha DL., Baid GC. Advances in gingival retraction. Int. J. Clin. Dent. Sci. 2: 64-67, 2011. Shillingburg HT. Fundamental of Fixed Prostho- dontics. 3 ed. Quintessence Publishing Co, Lon- don, 1997, 257-277.
  2. Ekren O., Kurtoğlu C. Dişeti Retraksiyon Yöntem- leri. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 18: 78-84, 2008. Yavuzyılmaz H. Metal Destekli Estetik (Veneer- Kaplama) Kronlar. Gazi Üni. İletişim Fakültesi Basımevi, Ankara,1989
  3. Donovan TE., Gandar BK., Nemetz H. Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. J. Prosthet. Dent. 53: 525-531, 1985.
  4. Csillag M., Nyiri G., Vag J., Fazekas A. Dose- related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction. J. Prosthet. Dent. 97: 6-11, 2007. Nemetz H. Tissue management in fixed prostho- dontics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 31: 628-636, 1974. Harrison JD. Effect of retraction materials on the gingival sulcus epithelium. J. Prosthet. Dent. 11: 514-521, 1961.
  5. Benson W., Bomberg TJ., Hatch RA., Hoffman W. Tissue displacement methods in fixed prostho- dontics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 55: 175-181, 1986.
  6. Weir DJ., Williams BH. Clinical effectiveness of mechanical-chemical tissue displacement met- hods. J. Prosthet. Dent. 51: 326-329, 1984.
  7. Wilson CA., Tay WM. Alum solution as an ad- junct to gingival retraction. Br. Dent. J. 142: 155- 158, 1977.
  8. Gupta G., Kumar S., Rao H., Garg P., Kumar R. Astringents in dentistry: a review. Asian J. Pharm. and Hea. Sci. 2: 428-432, 2012.
  9. Mohan M., Gupta A., Shenoy V., Parolia A. Pharmacological agents in dentistry: a review. Brit. J. Pharm. Res. 1: 66-87, 2011. Fischer D. Tissue management for making imp- ressions. Baum L editor- Restorative technigues for individual teeth. NewYork 1981. Mason Pub. USA, chap15,pp. 247-65
  10. Akca EA., Yildirim E., Dalkiz M., Yavuzyilmaz H., Beydemir B. Effects of different retraction me- dicaments on gingival tissue. Quintessence Int. 37: 53-59, 2006.
  11. Woody RD., Miller A., Staffanou RS. Review of the pH of hemostatic agents used in tissue displa- cement. J. Prosthet. Dent. 70: 191-192, 1993.
  12. Nowakowska D., Saczko J., Kulbacka J., Choro- manska A., Raszewski Z. Cytotoxic potential of vasoconstrictor experimental gingival retraction agents: in vitro study on primary human gingival fibroblasts. Folia Biol. 58: 37-43, 2012.
  13. Runyan DA., Reddy TG., Shimoda ML. Fluid absorbency of retraction cords after soaking in aluminum chloride solution. J