Journals / ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Surgical Outcomes of Autogenous Block Bone Grafts and the Effects on Dental Implant Survival

Otojen Blok Kemik Greftlerinin Cerrahi Sonuçları ve İmplant Sağ Kalımına Etkisi

Pages
1297–1306
Publication Date
2013-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, the success of different donor sites was discussed in accordance with the current literature

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Iatrogenic and congenital defects of the alveolar ridges make often impossible to perform optimal dental implant treatment without increasing alveolar bone volume prior to implant placement surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Autogenous bone grafts have high success rate due to their high revascularization capacity, and it is known that they have no disadvantages other than the donor site morbidity and the related complications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, the success of different donor sites was discussed in accordance with the current literature
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Alveolar rekonstrüksiyon · otojen greft · komplikasyon

Abstract

Iatrogenic and congenital defects of the alveolar ridges make often impossible to perform optimal dental implant treatment without increasing alveolar bone volume prior to implant placement surgery. Although graft materials derived from different sources may be used for reconstruction, autogenous bone is still considered as the gold standard. Autogenous bone grafts have high success rate due to their high revascularization capacity, and it is known that they have no disadvantages other than the donor site morbidity and the related complications. Forty two patients who were admitted to our clinic between the years of 2008 to 2012 becuse of horizontal and/or vertical alveolar bone deficiencies were included in this study. A total of 42 autogenous block grafts 34 onlay, 4 inlay, 5 interpositional , which harvested from different intraoral donor sites, were applied to the patients for reconstructing different types of alveolar ridge deficiencies. In this study, major complications such as graft expansion and graft loss, and minor complications such as haematoma, swelling, inflammation and paraesthesia that occurred during or after surgery, and implant survival rates, which were placed to the grafted sites, have been evaluated. Additionally, the success of different donor sites was discussed in accordance with the current literature

Özet

İatrojenik ve konjenital alveolar kemik defektleri, planlanan optimal dental implant tedavisinin, çoğu zaman implant cerrahisi öncesinde defekt onarımı olmadan yapılmasını imkansız hale getirir. Farklı kaynaklardan elde edilen greft materyalleri bu onarımlar için kullanılsa da, altın standart halen otojen greftlerdir. Yüksek revaskularizasyon kapasitesi nedeni ile başarı oranı çok yüksek olan otojen greftlerin, alıcı saha morbiditesi ve buna bağlı komplikasyonlar dışında dezavantajlarının olmadığı bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmaya 2008-2012 yılları arasında kliniğimize başvuran ve horizontal ve/veya vertikal alveolar kemik defekti olan 42 hasta dahil edilmiştir. Bu hastalara alveolar kret onarımı için çeşitli intraoral donör sahalardan alınan; 34 onley, 5 inley ve 5 interpozisyonel, toplam 42 blok greft uygulaması yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmada, cerrahi işlem sırasında veya sonrasında oluşan majör komplikasyonlar greftin ekspansiyonu ve kaybı , minör komplikasyonlar hematom, şişlik, inflamasyon ve parestezi ve greft bölgelerine yerleştirilen implantların sağ kalım oranları değerlendirilmiştir. Bunlara ilave olarak farklı otojen greft bölgelerin başarısı literatür eşliğinde tartışılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

KAMAN, S., ATIL, F., SÜER, B. T., TEKİN, U., KOÇYİĞİT, İ. D. (2013). Surgical Outcomes of Autogenous Block Bone Grafts and the Effects on Dental Implant Survival. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 1297–1306. https://ajindex.com/articles/728825

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bernstein S., Cooke J., Fotek P., Wang HL. Vertical bone augmentation: Where are we now? Implant Dent. 15: 219-228, 2006.
  2. Chiapasco M., Zaniboni M., Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 17(Suppl.2): 136-159 Ersu B. İmplant diş hekimliğinde kullanılan ağız içi otojen kemik greftleri. C.Ü. Diş. Hek. Fak. Derg. 10: 135-140, 2007.
  3. Uckan S., Veziroglu F., Dayangac E. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augumentation: Technique, complications, and implant survival rates. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 106: 511-515, 2008.
  4. Schwartz-Arad D., Levin L., Sigal L. Surgical success of intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation. Implant Dent. 14: 131-138, 2005.
  5. Hutton JE., Heath MR., Chai JY., Harnett J., Jemt T., Johns RB., McKenna S., McNamara DC., van Steenberghe D., Taylor R., et al. Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 10: 33-42, 1995.
  6. Cordaro L., Amadé DS., Cordaro M. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 13: 103-111, 2002.
  7. Sbordone L., Menchini-Fabris GB., Toti P., Sbordone C., Califano L., Guidetti F. Clinical survey of neurosensory side-effects of mandibular parasymphyseal bone harvesting. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 38: 139-145, 2009.
  8. Misch CE., Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent. 2: 158-167, 1993. Marx RE. Clinical application of bone biology to mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. Clin. Plast. Surg. 21: 377-392, 1994. Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 12: 767-776, 1997.
  9. Petrungaro PS., Amar S. Localized ridge augumentation with allogenic block grafts prior to implant placement: Case reports and histologic evaluations. Implant Dent. 14: 139-148, 2005.
  10. Thor A., Farzad P., Larsson S. Fracture of the tibia: Complication of bone grafting to the anterior maxilla. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 44: 46-48, 2006.
  11. Zins JE., Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone: Implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 72: 778- 785, 1983. Morelli T.,