SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çalışma ve Toplum / 2009 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 22

Ekonomi Politiğin İnsanı “Kim”dir?

Metin SARFATİ
Pages
57–96
Publication Date
2009-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article, within the frame of these ideas, subject-individual process will be handled within the context of modernization; original approach of the philosophy of political economy which is the work of Scottish tradition to this issue will be presented, and it will be argued that its approach to human is not one-dimensional, and even though words do not coincide with the contents, its individual and society envisagement is different from Heideggerian proposal, which becomes concrete today, when considered the contents

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Political economy has a significant place in the problematic of perception of social reality entirely just like its important role in generation of human sciences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Political economy has a significant place in the problematic of perception of social reality entirely just like its important role in generation of human sciences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article, within the frame of these ideas, subject-individual process will be handled within the context of modernization; original approach of the philosophy of political economy which is the work of Scottish tradition to this issue will be presented, and it will be argued that its approach to human is not one-dimensional, and even though words do not coincide with the contents, its individual and society envisagement is different from Heideggerian proposal, which becomes concrete today, when considered the contents
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Political economy has a significant place in the problematic of perception of social reality entirely just like its important role in generation of human sciences. In this article, within the frame of these ideas, subject-individual process will be handled within the context of modernization; original approach of the philosophy of political economy which is the work of Scottish tradition to this issue will be presented, and it will be argued that its approach to human is not one-dimensional, and even though words do not coincide with the contents, its individual and society envisagement is different from Heideggerian proposal, which becomes concrete today, when considered the contents

🔖

Cite This Article

SARFATİ, M. (2009). Ekonomi Politiğin İnsanı “Kim”dir?. Çalışma ve Toplum, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 22, 57–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/725965

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alada, A. D., (2000),
  2. İktisat Felsefesi ve Belirsizlik, Bağlam Yayınları,
  3. İstanbul Arosio, E. Malherbe M., (2007), Philosophie Française et philosophie écossaise, Vrin, Paris. Bréhier, E., (2004),
  4. Histoire de la philosophie, Ed Presse Universitaire de Paris, Paris Burke, E., (1989), Réflexions sur la Révolution de la France, Hachette, Paris Chauvier, S.(2001), Dire “Je”, Vrin, Paris Constant, B., (1997),
  5. Ecrits Politiques, Gallimard, Paris Deleule, D., (1979), Hume et la Naissance du libéralisme économique, Aubier Montaigne, Paris. Descartes, (2000), Discours de la méthode, Flammarion, Paris Diatkine, D., (1991), “Presentation de”, Recherche sur la nature et les causes de la Richesse des nations, Smith, A., Flammarion, Paris Dumont L., (1977),
  6. Homo aequalis, Gallimard, Paris. Dumont L., (1983), Essais sur l’individualisme, Ed.Sevil, Paris. Dupuy, J.P., (1992),
  7. Le sacrifice et l'envie, Ed Calmann-Lévy, Paris Ferguson, A., (1992), Essai sur I’histoire de la société civile, Presse Universitaire de Paris, Paris Ferry, L.-Renaut, A., (1987), 68-86 Itinéraires de l’individu, Gallimard, Paris. Ferry, L., (1999), “L’émergence du couple Ėtat/société”, Les critiques de la modernité politique, Calmann-Lévy, Paris. Finkielkraut, A., (2000),
  8. Nous autres modernes, Ellipses, Paris. Frank, M., (1986), L’ultime raison du sujet, Actes sud, Paris Gauchet, M., (2007a),
  9. La revolution moderne, Gallimard, Paris. Gauchet, M., (2007b), Un Monde desenchantè, Editions de l’Atelier, Paris. Gautier, C., (1996), ”L’individu” Dictionnaire d’éthique et de philosophie morale, Sperber, M.C., Presse Universitaire de Paris, Paris. Gautier, C., (2001), “peut-on parler de chez David Hume?” Hume et le concept de société civile, Gautier, C., FPresse Universitaire de Paris, Paris. Gusdorf, G., (1993a),
  10. Le Romantisme I, Editions Payot, Paris. Gusdorf, G., (1993b),
  11. Le Romantisme II, Editions Payot, Paris. Halevy, E., (1995), La formation du radicalisme philosophique I,II,III, Presse Universitaire de Paris, Paris Hazard, P., (1961), La crise de la conscience europèènne, Fayard, Paris. Hazard, P., (1963), La pensée europèènne au XVIII e siècle, Fayard, Paris. Heidegger, (1962), Chemins qui ne ménent nulle part, Gallimard, Paris. Hume, D., (1947), Enquéte sur les principes de la morale. Editions Aubier Montaigne, Paris. Hume, D., (1983), Enquéte sur l’entendement humain, Flammarion Hume, D., (1995), L’entendement, Traité de la nature humaine, Livre I, Flammarion. Paris. Hume, D., (2002), Essais et tra