Journals / Çalışma ve Toplum / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 55

The Study of Micro Credit Practice in the context of Capability Approach in the City of Sakarya

Yapabilirlikten Yoksunluk Açısından Mikro Kredi Uygulaması: Sakarya İli Örneği

Pages
2027–2054
Publication Date
2017-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To do so, individual freedoms, education, health, accommodation, cultural services, information access and the improving the situation of women in family and in community are accepted as indicators of measurement

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:According to the capability approach of Amartya Sen poverty is not just income inadequacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is what people are capable of doing and what they may become in real life conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To do so, individual freedoms, education, health, accommodation, cultural services, information access and the improving the situation of women in family and in community are accepted as indicators of measurement
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mikro Kredi · Yapabilirlikten Yoksunluk · Micro Credit

Abstract

According to the capability approach of Amartya Sen poverty is not just income inadequacy. It is what people are capable of doing and what they may become in real life conditions. While micro credit focuses on income inadequacy on the fight for poverty, what is its contribution in the context of capability approach? In this study the practice of micro credit in the city of Sakarya is handled not only from the point of poverty/income inadequacy but from the point of capability approach. To do so, individual freedoms, education, health, accommodation, cultural services, information access and the improving the situation of women in family and in community are accepted as indicators of measurement

Özet

Amartya Sen’in yapabilirlikten yoksunluk yaklaşımına göre yoksulluk sadece gelir yetersizliği demek değildir. İnsanların ne yapıp yapamayacakları ve ne olup olamayacakları ile ilgili olan ulaşabilecekleri gerçek yaşam koşullarıdır. Mikro kredi yoksullukla mücadelede gelir yetersizliği üzerine odaklanırken, yapabilirlikten yoksunluk bağlamında nelere katkı sağlamaktadır? Bu çalışmada Sakarya’da mikro kredi uygulaması sadece yoksulluk/gelir yetersizliği boyutuyla değil, yapabilirlikten yoksunluklar boyutuyla ele alınmıştır. Bunu ölçmek için bireysel özgürlükler, eğitim, sağlık, barınma, kültürel hizmetler ile bilgiye erişim, kadının aile ve toplum içerisindeki konumunun güçlendirilmesi yapabilirlikten yoksunluk göstergeleri olarak kabul edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZ, C. S., ÇOLAKOĞLU, C. (2017). The Study of Micro Credit Practice in the context of Capability Approach in the City of Sakarya. Çalışma ve Toplum, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 55, 2027–2054. https://ajindex.com/articles/725837

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ashe, J. and L. Parrott (2001), Impact Evaluation of PACT’s Women’s Empowerment Program in Nepal: A Savings and Literacy Led Alternative to Financial Institution Building, Cambridge Mass: Brandeis University. Balkız, Ö. (2015), “Mikro Kredi ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet: Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme”, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 14 (3), 535-557.
  2. Baltacı N. Ö. (2011), Kadınları Güçlendirme Mekanizması Olarak Mikro Kredi, Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü Genel Müdürlüğü Uzmanlık Tezi. Barro, Robert J. (1991), “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407- 444. Boz, Ç. (2009), Amartya Sen’in Yetkinlik Yaklaşımı: Teori ve Uygulama, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.
  3. Cabraal A. (2010), The Impact of Microfinance on the Capabilities of Participants, A Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Honours) School of Economics, Finance and Marketing College of Business RMIT University, Australia. Cheston, S., and L. Kuhn (2002), “Empowering Women through Microfinance”, in: S. Daley-Harris, comp. & ed. Pathways out of Poverty: Innovations in Microfinance for the Poorest Families, Bloomfield, CT, USA: Kumarian Press., 167-228.
  4. Clark, D. (2005), “Sen’s Capability Approach and the Many Spaces of Human Well-Being”, Journal of Development Studies, C. 4, S. 8, 1339-1368.
  5. Çak, D. (2007), Kalkınmanın Finansmanının Sağlanmasında Mikrokredi Yöntemi, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi SBE. Dehejia R. H and R. Gatti (2005), “Child Labor: The Role of Financial Development and Income Variability across Countries”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 53, No. 4, 913-931.
  6. Ergüngör, B. (2010), Bireysel Özgürlük ve Kültürel Özgürlük Tartışmalarına Katkı Olarak Amartya Sen’in Kapasite Yaklaşımı, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi.
  7. Fiege K. (2010), Economic Empowerment of Woman Through Microcredit, SLE Postgraduate Studies on International Cooperation, Berlin. Fraser, L. Jean (2007), Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Microfinance in Bolivia: Exploring the Link Between Theory and Practice, B.A. Acadia University, Master of Arts in Philosophy, Canada. Garikipati S. (2012), “Microcredit and Women’s Empowerment: Through the Lens of Time-Use Data from Rural India”, Development and Change, Volume 43, Issue 3, 719–750.
  8. Gürses, D. (2009), “İnsani Gelişme ve Türkiye”, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, C. 12,