Journals / Ortadoğu Etütleri / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Offensive Realism In American Foreign Policy In The Obama Period: The Case Of Arms Trade To The Middle East

Obama Dönemi Amerikan Diş Politikasinda Saldirgan Gerçekçilik: Ortadoğu’ya Silah Ticareti Örneği

Pages
368–392
Publication Date
2019-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it is claimed that the arms trade was used more effectively and immensely in the US foreign policy in Obama period and offensive realist policies of Bush period were maintained by different means.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:By analysing the place of arms trade in US foreign policy, this study argues that offensive realist approach of George W.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thus, it aims to compare the strategy and foreign policy tools used in the Middle East policies in the period of George Walker Bush and Barack Obama.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it is claimed that the arms trade was used more effectively and immensely in the US foreign policy in Obama period and offensive realist policies of Bush period were maintained by different means.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ABD Dış Politikası · Ortadoğu · Silah Ticareti

Abstract

By analysing the place of arms trade in US foreign policy, this study argues that offensive realist approach of George W. Bush era was maintained in Barack Obama era. Thus, it aims to compare the strategy and foreign policy tools used in the Middle East policies in the period of George Walker Bush and Barack Obama. In this context, this research investigates the dominant approaches to American foreign policy such as neo-realism and neo-liberalism and reveals the place of armament and arms trade in the Foreign Policy Analysis. Particularly, by making use of quantitative data it exhibits the leading role of the US in the global arms trade in the post-Cold War era that the arms trade as one of the main parameters of US foreign policy and its Middle East politics. As a result, it is claimed that the arms trade was used more effectively and immensely in the US foreign policy in Obama period and offensive realist policies of Bush period were maintained by different means.

Özet

Bu çalışma, ABD dış politikasında silah ticaretinin yerini analiz ederek George Walker Bush dönemindeki saldırgan gerçekçi yaklaşımın Barack Obama döneminde de sürdürüldüğünü iddia etmektedir. Bunun için Bush ve Obama dönemlerinde Ortadoğu politikalarında kullanılan strateji ve dış politika araçlarını karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda bu araştırma, öncelikle neo-realizm ve neo-liberalizm gibi Amerikan dış politikasına hâkim yaklaşımları inceleyerek, silahlanma ve silah ticareti kavramlarının dış politika analizindeki yerini açıklamaktadır. Özellikle, Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde ABD’nin global silah ticaretindeki başat rolünü niceliksel verilerle göstererek, silah ticaretinin ABD dış politikasının ve Ortadoğu politikalarının temel parametrelerinden olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Sonuç olarak, silah ticaretinin Obama dönemi ABD dış politikasında daha etkili kullanıldığını ve Bush dönemindeki saldırgan gerçekçi politikaların farklı araçlarla devam ettiğini saptamaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ORAN, F. Ç., ÖZCAN, N. (2019). Offensive Realism In American Foreign Policy In The Obama Period: The Case Of Arms Trade To The Middle East. Ortadoğu Etütleri, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 368–392. https://ajindex.com/articles/720330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Barany, Zoltan D. 2009. “Building Democratic Armies” In Is Democracy Exportable?. (ed.) Barany Zoltan D. and Moser Robert G. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Belasco, Amy. 2014 (December). “The Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Other Global War on Terror Operations Since 9/11”. Congressional Research Service (CRS). Blancfield, Kate; Wezeman, Pieter; Wezeman, Siemon. 2017 (February 22). “The State of Major Arms Transfers in 8 Graphics”. SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/commentary/blog/2017/state-major-arms-transfers-8-graphics. (Erişim Tarihi 08.08.2019).
  3. Blanchard, Christopher; Arieff, Alexis; Danon, Zoe; Katzman, Kenneth; Sharp, Jeremy; Zanotti, Jim, 2012 (March). “Change in the Middle East: Implications for U.S. Policy”. Congress Researh Service (CRS). Blanton, Shannon Lindsey. 2000. "Promoting Human Rights and Democracy in the Developing World: US Rhetoric Versus US Arms Exports". American Journal of Political Science. 44 (1). Blanton, Shannon Lindsey. 2005. "Foreign Policy in Transition? Human Rights, Democracy, and US Arms Exports". International Studies Quarterly. 49 (4): 647-68. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2018, pp. 12-13 https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2018-full-report.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 29.04.2019). BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2011, p. 7, http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2011/ph240/goldenstein1/docs/bp2011.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 29.04.2019).
  4. Christensen, James. 2015. “Weapons, Security, and Oppression: A Normative Study of International Arms Transfers”. Journal of Political Philosophy. 23 (1): 23–39.
  5. Entous, Adam. 2010 (September 12). “Saudi Arms Deal Advances: White House to Notify Congress Soon of $60 Billion Package, Largest Ever for U.S.”. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704621204575488361149625050 (Erişim Tarihi: 17.06.2019).
  6. Erdurmaz, Serdar. 2010. Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Silahlanma. Ankara:
  7. Berikan Yayınevi.
  8. Ericson, Jennifer. 2015. Dangerous Trade: Arms Exports, Human Rights, and International Reputation. New York: Columbia University Press.
  9. Garcia, Denise. 2014. “Global Norms on Arms: The Significance of the Arms Trade Treaty for Global Security in World Politics”. Global Policy. 5 (4): 425–432.
  10. Grimmentt, Richard F. 1994 (July). “Conventional Arms Transfers to the Third World, 1986-1993”, Congressional Research Service (CRS). Grimmentt, Richard F. 2000 (August). “Conventional Arms Transfers to