SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams

Açık İnovasyon Takımlarında Tutumun İnovasyon Üretme Üzerindeki Etkisi

Sezer AYAZ
Belkıs ÖZKARA
Pages
153–173
Publication Date
2022-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In result of correlation analysis, no significant relationship was found between open innovation attitude and open innovation generation capacity at the p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Open innovation has been studied in many different sample groups and cultures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In consequence of analysis and tests, significant differences were found as to demographic characteristics of respondents belonging to different groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In result of correlation analysis, no significant relationship was found between open innovation attitude and open innovation generation capacity at the p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Açık inovasyon · tutum · inovasyon üretme kapasitesi

Abstract

Open innovation has been studied in many different sample groups and cultures. However, relationship between open innovation attitude and open innovation generating capacity on open innovation teams is investigated for the first time in Turkey. The data were obtained through a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, independent samples t-test, simple linear regression analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were used to analyze data. In consequence of analysis and tests, significant differences were found as to demographic characteristics of respondents belonging to different groups. In result of correlation analysis, no significant relationship was found between open innovation attitude and open innovation generation capacity at the p

Özet

Açık inovasyon birçok farklı örneklem grubu ve kültürde incelenmiştir. Ancak, açık inovasyon ekiplerinde açık inovasyon tutumu ile açık inovasyon üretme kapasitesi arasındaki ilişki Türkiye'de ilk kez araştırılmıştır. Veriler anket yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, ANOVA, bağımsız örnekler t testi, basit doğrusal regresyon analizi ve Pearson korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Analiz ve testler sonucunda, farklı gruplara ait katılımcıların demografik özelliklerine göre önemli farklılıklar bulunmuştur. Korelasyon analizi sonucunda açık inovasyon tutumu ile açık inovasyon üretme kapasitesi arasında p

🔖

Cite This Article

AYAZ, S., ÖZKARA, B. (2022). The Effect of Attitude on Innovation Generation in Open Innovation Teams. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 153–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/694581

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50. 179-211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 84:888-918
  2. Arnold, J., Cooper, C. L., & Robertson, I. T. (1991). Work psychology. Understanding human behaviour in the workplace. Pitman, London Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analiz el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akedemi Yayıncılık. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (17. Baskı). Ankara:
  3. Pegem Yayınları Chae, B., Li, X. & Zhu, R. (2013). Judging product effectiveness from perceived spatial proximity. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 317-335.
  4. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  5. Chesbrough, H. (2003).
  6. The Era of Open Innovation, MIT sloan Management Rewiew, Vol. 44, Issue 3, 35-41.
  7. Chesbrough, H. W. & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open Innovation and Strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57–76.
  8. Coulter, K. S. & Norberg, P. A. (2009). The effects of physical distance between regular and sale prices on numerical difference perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(2), 144-157.
  9. Davidson, A. R., Jaccard, J. J. (1979). Variables that moderate the attitude-behavior relation: Results of a longitudinal survey. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37: 1 364-76
  10. Dodgson, M. Gann, D. & Salter, A. (2006).The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter and Gamble. Research and Development Management, 36, 333–346.
  11. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
  12. Gabrenya, W. K., Arkin, R. M. (1979). The effect of commitment on expectancy value and expectancy weight in social decision making. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 5:86-90
  13. Gassmann, O (2006). Opening up the innovation process: Towards an agenda. RandD Management, 36, 223–228.
  14. Huang, F., Rice, J. (2009). The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating “open innovation” outcomes: a study of australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Innovation Management Vol. 13, No. 2 pp. 201–220.
  15. JISC (2009). Facilitating Open Innovation: Landscape and Feasiblity Study, JISC Business and Community Engagement Programme, October. Karasar, N. (2004). Bilimsel araştırma yönte