SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

FoMO PERCEPTION OF ACADEMIC STAFF IN COVID-19 PPOCESS: SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT

COVID-19 SÜRECİNDE AKADEMİ ÇALIŞANLARININ FoMO ALGISI: ÖLÇEK GELİŞTİRME VE DEĞERLENDİRME

Sezer AYAZ
Veli BATDI
Pages
375–393
Publication Date
2022-03-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the light of the analysis, it was found that FCS is a valid and reliable measurement tool.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research was performed methodically to develop a scale to determine the perception of FoMO (The Fear of Missing Outside) in the Covid-19 pandemic period and to carry out reliability and validity studies of this scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data were evaluated through the questionnaires obtained from a total of 1395 university academic staff via google form.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the light of the analysis, it was found that FCS is a valid and reliable measurement tool.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:FoMO · Akademik Personel · Covid-19

Abstract

This research was performed methodically to develop a scale to determine the perception of FoMO (The Fear of Missing Outside) in the Covid-19 pandemic period and to carry out reliability and validity studies of this scale. The data were evaluated through the questionnaires obtained from a total of 1395 university academic staff via google form. In this search, the Descriptive Information Form and the FoMO Perception in the Covid-19 Pandemic Process Scale (FCS) were used as a five-point Likert type scale. The construct validity of this scale was evaluated by factor analysis. As a result of the explanatory factor analysis, the Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient was found to be 0.776. The final form of the scale was tested with confirmatory factor analysis. Measurements revealed that the result has a high goodness of fit and can be used to measure FoMO perception during the Covid-19 pandemic. The relationship between the sub-scales of FCS showed that the factors were in a significant relationship with each other. In the light of the analysis, it was found that FCS is a valid and reliable measurement tool. It was concluded that researches with different groups using this scale would be useful.

Özet

Bu araştırma, Covid-19 pandemi döneminde FoMO (Gelişmeleri Kaçırma Korkusu) algısını belirlemeye yönelik bir ölçek geliştirmek ve bu ölçeğin güvenirlik ve geçerlilik çalışmalarını gerçekleştirmek amacıyla metodik olarak yapılmıştır. Veriler, toplam 1395 üniversite akademik çalışanından google formu ile elde edilen anketler aracılığıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Bu araştırmada Betimleyici Bilgi Formu ve Covid-19 Pandemi Sürecinde FoMO Algısı Ölçeği (FCS) Algısı beşli Likert tipi bir ölçek olarak kullanılmıştır. Bu ölçeğin yapı geçerliliği faktör analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Açıklayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda Cronbach Alpha iç tutarlılık katsayısı 0.776 olarak bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin son hali doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile test edilmiştir. Ölçümler, sonucun yüksek bir uyum iyiliğine sahip olduğunu ve Covid-19 pandemisi sırasında FoMO algısını ölçmek için kullanılabileceğini ortaya koymuştur. FCS'nin alt ölçekleri arasındaki korelasyon verileri, faktörlerin birbirleriyle anlamlı bir ilişki içinde olduğunu göstermiştir. Analizler ışığında FCS'nin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu ölçeğin kullanılacağı farklı gruplarla yapılacak araştırmaların faydalı olacağı sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYAZ, S., BATDI, V. (2022). FoMO PERCEPTION OF ACADEMIC STAFF IN COVID-19 PPOCESS: SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 375–393. https://ajindex.com/articles/711599

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abed, M. A., Hall, L. A., & Moser, D. K. (2011). Spielberger’s state anxiety inventory: Development of a shortened version for critically ill patients. Mental Health Nursing, 32 (4), 220-227.
  2. Argan, M., Tokay Argan, M., & İpek, G. (2018). I wish I were! Anatomy of a fomsumer. Journal of Internet Applications & Management, 9(1), 43-57.
  3. Bajgar, J., Ciarrochi, J., Lane, R., & Deane, F. P. (2005). Developmental of the levels of emotional awareness scale for children (LEASC). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(4), 569-586.
  4. Benet, M.V., & John, O.P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analysis of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729-750.
  5. Bentler, P.M. & Bonett, D.G.(1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 8, 588–606.
  6. Boyd, C.J., Frey, M.A. & Aaronson L.S. (1988). Structural equation models and nursing research: part I. Nurs Res. 37, 249-52.
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Manual of data analysis for social sciences. Ankara:
  8. Pegem A Publishing. Casale, S., & Flett, G. L. (2020). Interpersonally-based fears during the covid-19 pandemic: reflections on the fear of missing out and the fear of not mattering constructs. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 17(2), 88-93.
  9. Craig, K. J., Hietanen, H., Markova, I. S. & Berrios, G. E. (2008). The irritability questionnaire: A new scale for the measurement of irritability. Psychiatry Research, 159(3), 367-375.
  10. Delacre, M., Leys, C., Mora, Y. L., & Lakens, D. (2019). Taking parametric assumptions seriously: arguments for the use of welch’s f-test instead of the classical f-test in one-way ANOVA. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), 13. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.198
  11. Dossey, L. (2014). FoMO, digital dementia, and our dangerous experiment. Explor J Sci Heal [Internet], 10(2), 69–73. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2013.12.008
  12. First, M. B., Frances, M.D. & Pincus, M.D. (1999). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DSM-IV, Washington DC. Fox, J. & Moreland, J.J.(2015). The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances. Comput Human Behav [Internet], 45, 168– 76. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb. 2014.11.083 Gorbalenya, A. E., Baker, S. C., Baric, R. S., de Groot, R. J., Drosten, C. & Gulyaeva, A. A. (2020). S