Journals / Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section B: Chemical Engineering / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of the Process Parameters on Subcritical Water Gasification of Sorghum by Response Surface Methodology

Pages
1–12
Publication Date
2021-05-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The optimum conditions for maximum hydrogen production were determined as a residence time of 58.6 min, water volume of 24.5 mL and catalyst amount of 0.02g.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study response surface methodology (RSM) with Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used to evaluate the effects of process parameters of reaction time, initial water volume, amount of feedstock and amount of catalyst on total gasification and hydrogen production yield by low temperature hydrothermal gasification of Sorghum biomass at 250°C.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Numerical optimization was used to optimize the process parameters for maximum yield hydrogen production.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The optimum conditions for maximum hydrogen production were determined as a residence time of 58.6 min, water volume of 24.5 mL and catalyst amount of 0.02g.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:biomass · hydrothermal gasification · hydrogen

Abstract

In this study response surface methodology (RSM) with Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used to evaluate the effects of process parameters of reaction time, initial water volume, amount of feedstock and amount of catalyst on total gasification and hydrogen production yield by low temperature hydrothermal gasification of Sorghum biomass at 250°C. Ruthenium (III) chloride was used as a catalyst in catalytic runs. Significances of the main and interacting effects of independent parameters were determined by ANOVA. Numerical optimization was used to optimize the process parameters for maximum yield hydrogen production. The optimum conditions for maximum hydrogen production were determined as a residence time of 58.6 min, water volume of 24.5 mL and catalyst amount of 0.02g.

🔖

Cite This Article

SEÇER, A., ŞAYAN, E., ÜZDEN, Ş. T., HASAN, A. (2021). Evaluation of the Process Parameters on Subcritical Water Gasification of Sorghum by Response Surface Methodology. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section B: Chemical Engineering, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 1–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/681456

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Omer AM. Energy, environmOmer, A. M. (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(9), 2265–2300. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001ent and sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2008
  2. Dunn S. Hydrogen futures: Toward a sustainable energy system. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2002
  3. Ni M, Leung DYC, Leung MKH, Sumathy K. An overview of hydrogen production from biomass. Fuel Process Technol. 2006
  4. Alauddin ZABZ, Lahijani P, Mohammadi M, Mohamed AR. Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010
  5. Onwudili JA, Williams PT. Hydrothermal gasification and oxidation as effective flameless conversion technologies for organic wastes. J Energy Inst. 2008
  6. Kruse A. Hydrothermal biomass gasification. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2009
  7. Elliott DC. Catalytic hydrothermal gasification of biomass. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 2008
  8. Azadi P, Farnood R. Review of heterogeneous catalysts for sub- and supercritical water gasification of biomass and wastes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2011
  9. Osada M, Sato T, Watanabe M, Shirai M, Arai K. Catalytic gasification of wood biomass in subcritical and supercritical water. Combust Sci Technol. 2006;178(1–3):537–52
  10. Cortright RD, Davda RR, Dumesic JA. Hydrogen from catalytic reforming of biomass-derived hydrocarbons in liquid water. Nature. 2002
  11. Kruse A, Dahmen N. Hydrothermal biomass conversion: Quo vadis? J Supercrit Fluids. 2018
  12. Montgomery DC. Design and Analysis of Experiments Eighth Edition. Design. 2012
  13. Box G, Draper N. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces, 1st Edition. Wiley Ser Probab Math statics, ISBN 978-0471810339. 1987
  14. Box GEP, Behnken DW. Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables. Technometrics. 1960
  15. Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, Matos GD, David JM, Brandão GC, et al. Box-Behnken design: An alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2007
  16. Wu H, Hanna MA, Jones DD. Fluidized-bed gasification of dairy manure by Box-Behnken design. Waste Manag Res. 2012
  17. Bazargan A, Bazargan M, McKay G. Optimization of rice husk pretreatment for energy production. Renew Energy. 2015
  18. Inayat M, Sulaiman SA, Kurnia JC. Catalytic co-gasification of coconut shells and oil palm fronds blends in the presence of cement,