Journals / Journal of advances in vetbio science and techniques / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

In Trout Facilities Located In Keban Dam Lake (Elazig) the Used Medicaments, Vaccines and Their Activities That Investigation

Pages
1–10
Publication Date
2018-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In interviews with companies where vaccination, it is learned that vaccination is more preferred, and the vaccines that applied cause pre-protection and detected that this pre-protection reduce application of antibacterial medicines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, investigation of medicaments’ and vaccines’ that use for applied treatment method against common diseases at 39 fish farm where made in production facilities about rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) at Keban dam lake, located on the border of Elazıg one of important fisheries area made by taking necessary records retro perspective questioning made, the efficacy of the vaccine’s and medicament’s was studied to reveal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to these results, in the ANOVA test between pathogens and pharmaceutical efficiency, significant differences were found (p<0,01).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In interviews with companies where vaccination, it is learned that vaccination is more preferred, and the vaccines that applied cause pre-protection and detected that this pre-protection reduce application of antibacterial medicines.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Oncorhynchus mykiss · Keban Dam Lake · Vaccine

Abstract

In the study, investigation of medicaments’ and vaccines’ that use for applied treatment method against common diseases at 39 fish farm where made in production facilities about rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) at Keban dam lake, located on the border of Elazıg one of important fisheries area made by taking necessary records retro perspective questioning made, the efficacy of the vaccine’s and medicament’s was studied to reveal. By using the answer that given TUKEY and ANOVA test were made, link between the measures taken by disease factors was evaluated statistically. According to these results, in the ANOVA test between pathogens and pharmaceutical efficiency, significant differences were found (p<0,01). When compared to year production capacity, a significant difference was found between the years (p<0,01). According to results of variance analysis made between pathogens and preventions, it is understood that no significant difference (p>0,05). According to results of variance analysis made between engineer number, pathogens and preventions, it is understood that no significant difference (p>0,05). It is understood that no significant difference between production capacity and workers (p>0,01). In interviews with companies where vaccination, it is learned that vaccination is more preferred, and the vaccines that applied cause pre-protection and detected that this pre-protection reduce application of antibacterial medicines.

Özet

In the study, investigation of medicaments’ and vaccines’ that use for applied treatment method against common diseases at 39 fish farm where made in production facilities about rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) at Keban dam lake, located on the border of Elazıg one of important fisheries area made by taking necessary records retro perspective questioning made, the efficacy of the vaccine’s and medicament’s was studied to reveal. By using the answer that given TUKEY and ANOVA test were made, link between the measures taken by disease factors was evaluated statistically. According to these results, in the ANOVA test between pathogens and pharmaceutical efficiency, significant differences were found (p<0,01). When compared to year production capacity, a significant difference was found between the years (p<0,01). According to results of variance analysis made between pathogens and preventions, it is understood that no significant difference (p>0,05). According to results of variance analysis made between engineer number, pathogens and preventions, it is understood that no significant difference (p>0,05). It is understood that no significant difference between production capacity and workers (p>0,01). In interviews with companies where vaccination, it is learned that vaccination is more preferred, and the vaccines that applied cause pre-protection and detected that this pre-protection reduce application of antibacterial medicines.

🔖

Cite This Article

YANEN, R., CENGİZLER, İ., ALDIK, R. (2018). In Trout Facilities Located In Keban Dam Lake (Elazig) the Used Medicaments, Vaccines and Their Activities That Investigation. Journal of advances in vetbio science and techniques, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 1–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/676927

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Koç B (2007): Sivas İli Alabalık İşletmelerinin Durumu, Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi,
  2. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2007, 54s.[2] Demir N (1992): İhtiyoloji. İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Basımevi, İstanbul.[3] Tekelioğlu, N. (2000): İç su balıkları yetiştiriciliği. Ç.Ü. Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Yayınları. Yayın No: 2, Adana.[4] Anonymous (2010):
  3. Devlet Su İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. http/:www.dsi.gov.tr/topraksu.htm[5] Alpaz A, Hoşsucu H (1996): İç Su Balıkları Yetiştiriciliği, (2. Baskı). Ege Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 12.[6] Anonymous (2013): Su Ürünleri İstatistikleri. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. ISBN 978-975-19-6242-3.[7] Güner B (2015): Keban Baraj Gölü’nde Kültür Balıkçılığı. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 25, Sayı:1, Sayfa: 1-8, Elazığ.[8] Cengizler I (2000): Balık Hastalıkları Ders Kitabı. Çukurova Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Yayınlan, Yayın No:7 Adana, 117s.[9] Al-Dughaym AM (2000): Recovery and Antibiogram Studies of Aeromonas hydrophila and Pseudomonas fluorescens from Naturally and Experimentally Infected Tilapia Fishes. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 3(12): 2185-2187.[10] İspir Ü, Şeker E, Sağlam N, Dörücü M, (2004): Doğu Anadolu Bölgesinde Bazı Gökkuşağı Alabalığı (Oncorhynchus mykiss) İşletmelerinde Görülen Flavobacterium psychrophilum Enfeksiyonunun Araştırılması. Fırat Üniversitesi. Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 16 (4), 718-724. (2004).[11] Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (1974): Aeromonas hydrophila In: Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 8th ed., The Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore, 345-348s.[12] Cipriano RC (2001): Aeromonas hydrophila And Aeromonad Septicemias of Fish. Erişim: [http://w3.kunsan.ac.kr/~psw/technote/main.cgi/aeromonas. pdf? down_num =1093572320&board=pds&command=down_load&d=& filename = aeromonas.pdf]. Erişim Tarihi: 11.07.2006.[13] Erer H (1981): Aynalı Sazanlarda (Cyprinus carpio L.) Deneysel Aeromonas hydrophila Enfeksiyonunda (Bakteriyel Hemorajik Septisemi) Oluşan Patolojik Bulguların İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi.[14] Samuel M, Lam TJ, Sin JM (1996): Effect of Laminaran on The Protective Immunity of Blue Grourami, Trichogaster Trichopterus Against Aeromonas hydrophila of Shellfish Immunol. 6 (6): 443-454.[15] Sommerset I, Krossøy B, Biering E, Frost P (2005): Vaccines for fish in aquaculture. Expert Rev. Vaccines 4(1), 8 9-101.[16] Meyer FP, Scnick R