Journals / Journal of advances in vetbio science and techniques / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

A comparison of Activating Solutions with Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Gökkuşağı Alabalığı (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Suni Döllemesinde Aktivasyon Solüsyonları ve Kuluçka Suyunun Karşılaştırılması

Pages
8–15
Publication Date
2018-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, both motility durations and fertilization rates obtained by using A1 and A2 were significantly higher than those values of obtained by HW.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the propagation of rainbow trout, the available water supply used for incubation of fertilized egg is generally used for also spermatozoa being activated to reach eggs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the present study was to assess comparisons of the effects of two lab-made activating solutions and hatchery water on progressive sperm motility percentage (%), duration of progressive sperm motility (s), and fertilization success in artificial insemination of rainbow trout.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, both motility durations and fertilization rates obtained by using A1 and A2 were significantly higher than those values of obtained by HW.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aktivasyon solüsyonları · kuluçka suyu · suni dölleme

Abstract

In the propagation of rainbow trout, the available water supply used for incubation of fertilized egg is generally used for also spermatozoa being activated to reach eggs. The aim of the present study was to assess comparisons of the effects of two lab-made activating solutions and hatchery water on progressive sperm motility percentage (%), duration of progressive sperm motility (s), and fertilization success in artificial insemination of rainbow trout. For this purpose, an activating solution (A1) containing 60 mM NaHCO3, 50 mM Tris pH=9.0 and another activating solution (A2) containing 20 mM Tris, 30 mM glycine, 125 mM NaCl, pH=9.0, and also hatchery water (HW) were used for activation of spermatozoa and fertilization. The average motility percentages of samples activated by HW, A1 and A2 were observed >90% with no significant differences, while the durations of progressive motility were found to be significantly different as 22.5±0.7 s, 30.0±1.4 s and 30.5±0.7 s respectively. The lowest average fertilization rate (64.6±1.4 %) was obtained using HW, while those values were 89.4±5.1 and 91.3±0.6 % using A1 and A2 respectively. Consequently, both motility durations and fertilization rates obtained by using A1 and A2 were significantly higher than those values of obtained by HW.

Özet

Gökkuşağı alabalığı üretimin, genellikle döllenmiş yumurtaların inkübasyonu için kullanılan mevcut su kaynağı aynı zamanda, suni döllemede sperm hücrelerinin aktivasyonu içinde kullanılır. Bu çalışma laboratuvarda hazırlanmış aktivasyon solüsyonlarının ve kuluçka suyunun doğrusal motilite yüzdesi (%), doğrusal motilite süresi (s) ve döllenme oranlarına etkilerinin değerlendirilmesini amaçlamıştır. Bu amaçla, biri 60 mM NaHCO3, 50 mM Tris pH=9,0 içeriğine sahip (A1), diğeri 20 mM Tris, 30 mM glycine, 125 mM NaCl, pH=9.0 içeriğine sahip (A2) iki farklı aktivasyon solüsyonu ve kuluçka suyu (HW) spermatozoa aktivasyonu ve suni dölleme de kullanılmıştır. HW, A1 ve A2 ile aktive edilmiş örneklerin ortalama motilite yüzdeleri, istatistiki fark olmaksızın > %90 olarak gözlenmişken, doğrusal motilite süreleri, sırasıyla 22.5±0.7 s, 30.0±1.4 s ve 30.5±0.7 s olarak kaydedilmiş ve önemli derecede fark olduğu bulunmuştur. En düşük ortalama döllenme oranı (% 64.6±1.4) HW kullanılarak elde edilmişken, bu oranların A1 ve A2 kullanıldığında %89.4±5.1 ve 91.3±0.6 olarak kaydedilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, A1 ve A2 kullanılarak elde edilen hem motilite süreleri hem de döllenme oranları, HW kullanılarak elde edilenlerden önemli derecede yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNANAN, B. E., ACAR, Ü., URÇUK, H., ÇELİK, E. (2018). A comparison of Activating Solutions with Hatchery Water in Artificial Insemination of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Journal of advances in vetbio science and techniques, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 8–15. https://ajindex.com/articles/676922

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abascal, F.J., Cosson, J., Fauvel, C. (2007). Characterization of sperm motility in sea bass: the effect of heavy metals and physicochemical variables on sperm motility. Journal of Fish Biology, 70(2), 509–522.
  2. Alavi, S.M.H., Cosson, J., (2005). Sperm motility in fishes. I. Effects of temperature and pH: a review. Cell Biology International, 29: 101–110.
  3. Alavi, S.M.H., Cosson, J. (2006). Sperm motility in fishes. (II) Effects of ions and osmolality: A review. Cell Biology International, 30: 1–14.
  4. Billard, R. (1977). A new technique of artificial insemination for salmonids using a sperm diluent. Fisheries, 1: 24–25.
  5. Billard, R. (1986). Spermatogenesis and spermatology of some teleost fish species. Reprod Nutr Develop, 26(4): 877–920.
  6. Billard, R. (1988). Artificial insemination and gamete management in fish. Marine Behaviour and Physiology, 14(1): 3–21.
  7. Billard, R. (1992). Reproduction in rainbow trout: sex differentiation, dynamics of gametogenesis, biology and preservation of gametes. Aquaculture, 100: 263–298.
  8. Billard, R., Cosson. J., Perchec, G., Linhart, O. (1995). Biology of sperm and artificial reproduction in carp. Aquaculture, 129: 95–112.
  9. Billard, R., Jensen, J.O.T. (1996). Gamete removal, fertilization and incubation. In: Pennell W, Barton BA (ed’s), Principles of Salmonid Culture, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 291-363. 1039 p. Borges, A., Siqueira, S.R., Jurinitz, D.F., Zanini, R., Amaral, F., Grillo, M.L., Oberst, E.R., Wassermann, G.F. (2005). Biochemical composition of seminal plasma and annual variations in semen characteristics of jun-dia Rhamdia quelen (Quoy and Gaimard, Pimelodidae). Fish Physiol Biochem, 31: 45–53.
  10. Cejko, B.I., Glogowski, J., Kowalski, R.K., Kucharczyk, D., Targoñska, K. (2008).
  11. Description of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (l.), semen obtained from males held under different rearing conditions. Archives of Polish Fisheries, 16(1): 93–100.
  12. Cejko, B.I., Sarosiek, B., Kowalski, R.K. (2013). Application of Computer-assisted Sperm Analysis in Selecting the Suitable Solution for Common Carp, Cyprinus carpio L., Sperm Motility. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 44(3): 466–472.
  13. Cosson, J. (2004). The ionic and osmotic factors controlling motility of fish spermatozoa. Aquaculture International, 12: 69–85.
  14. Cosson, M.P., Cosson, J. Andre, F., Billard, R., (1995). cAMP/ATP relationship in the activation of trout sperm motility: their interaction in membrane-derived models and in live spermatozoa. Cell Motility a