The overall effect size of the meta-analysis was found to be 0.66 (95% confidence interval; 0.58–0.74) (p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study carried a meta-analysis of the pregnancy rates of different synchronization protocols implemented in ewes in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A common pregnancy rate was estimated by coalescing pregnancy rates, and the heterogeneity between the studies was explored.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall effect size of the meta-analysis was found to be 0.66 (95% confidence interval; 0.58–0.74) (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:ewes · meta-analysis · pregnancy rate
Abstract
The present study carried a meta-analysis of the pregnancy rates of different synchronization protocols implemented in ewes in Turkey. A common pregnancy rate was estimated by coalescing pregnancy rates, and the heterogeneity between the studies was explored. All studies were carried out independently. This article compiled 28 studies that determined the pregnancy rate for 2,437 ewes in the synchronization studies between the years 1995–2020. The overall effect size of the meta-analysis was found to be 0.66 (95% confidence interval; 0.58–0.74) (p
MAT, B., POLAT, M., ÖZEL, Z., DEMİRSÖZ, M. (2021). Comparison of impact of synchronization protocols applied to ewes on pregnancy rate in Turkey with bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of advances in vetbio science and techniques, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 106–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/676882
Referans1 Akbaş, Ö. F. (2016). The effect of different synchronization programs on some reproductive parameters during breeding season in awassi ewes. Mustafa Kemal University Graduate School of Health Sciences, MSc Thesis, Hatay-Turkey. Referans2 Aköz, M., Bülbül, B., Bozkurt A. M., & Dere, S. (2006). Induction of multiple births in Akkaraman cross-bred sheep synchronized with short duration and different doses of progesterone treatment combined with PMSG outside the breeding season. Bulletin-Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, 50(1), 97–100. Referans3 Aköz, M., Bodu M., &Acibaeva B. (2015). Current Methods in estrus synchronization pf ewes and does. Turkiye Klinikleri J Reprod Artif Insemin-Special Topics, 1(2), 1-8. Referans4 Algan, M. N. (2014). The effects of fluorogeston acetate and eCG on some reproductive parameters in lactating Pirlak sheep. Afyon Kocatepe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, MSc Thesis, Afyonkarahisar-Turkey. Referans5 Arıkan M. S. (2021). Koyun ve Keçi Hekimliği. In: Yarsan, E. (Ed.), İşletme Ekonomisi, Chapter 21, pp.821-822,. ISBN 9789752778238 Referans6 Ataman, M. B., Aköz, M., Fındık, M., & Saban, E. (2009). Induction of synchronized oestrus in Akkaraman cross-bred ewes treated with prostaglandine F2 alpha, norgestomet and sponges impregnated with different doses of fluorogestene acetate at the beginning transitional period. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 15(5), 801–805. Referans7 Baştan, A., & Küpülü, Ş. (1995). The effects of melatonin and progestagen on reproductive performance in Akkaraman ewes. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg., 4(2), 263–270. Referans8 Bisinotto, R. S., Lean, I. J., Thatcher, W. W., & Santos, J. E. P. (2015). Meta-analysis of progesterone supplementation during timed artificial insemination programs in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 98(4), 2472–2487. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8954 Referans 9Bolstad, W. M. (2007).
Introduction to Bayesian Statistics, Wiley-Interscience, UK. Referans 10 Borchardt, S., Haimerl, P., Pohl, A., & Heuwieser, W. (2017). Evaluation of prostaglandin F2α versus prostaglandin F2α plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone as Presynch methods preceding an Ovsynch in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci, 100(5), 4065–4077. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11956 Referans 11 Borchardt, S., Pohl, A., Carvalho, P. D., Fricke, P. M., & Heuwieser, W. (2018). Short communication: effect of adding a second prostaglandin F2a injection during the Ovsynch protocol on luteal regression and fertility