SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of advances in vetbio science and techniques / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

The analysis of the effects of propolis products as food supplements on the viability of baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) and murine macrophage (RAW 264.7) cells by spectrophotometric MTT assay

Serol KORKMAZ
Ayşe PARMAKSIZ
Ahmet SAİT
Burcu İrem OMURTAG KORKMAZ
Pages
45–53
Publication Date
2022-04-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

So, Additives in the propolis food supplement might be an effective factor on cell viability as much as dilution factor and propolis content.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Propolis is beeswax with rich bioactive compound content.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to investigate the effect of food supplement products based on propolis at several concentrations on the viability of baby hamster kidney cells and murine macrophage cell lines (BHK-21 and RAW 264.7).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:So, Additives in the propolis food supplement might be an effective factor on cell viability as much as dilution factor and propolis content.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:BHK-21 · Cytotoxicity · Food Supplement

Abstract

Propolis is beeswax with rich bioactive compound content. On the market, there many propolis products as food supplements for the consumers. This study aimed to investigate the effect of food supplement products based on propolis at several concentrations on the viability of baby hamster kidney cells and murine macrophage cell lines (BHK-21 and RAW 264.7). For this purpose, both cell lines were treated with the two-fold serial dilutions (from 20 to 2-10) of each six propolis products (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5 and P6) after reaching monolayer cell in 96-well microplates. The viability and inhibition of cells were spectrophotometrically determined by MTT assay after 24 h. For BHK-21, the IC50s of P1, P2, P3, P4, P5 and P6 were calculated as 0.003, 0.178, 0,082, 0.451, 0.278 and 0.384 %, respectively. For RAW 264.7, the IC50 of P1, P2, P3, P4, P5 and P6 were calculated as 0.260, 0.218, 0.115, 0.257, 0.207 and 0.265%, respectively. The IC50 value was higher for RAW 264.7 cells than for BHK-21 cells. So, the low cytotoxic effect was determined in RAW 264.7 cells. Propolis products contain some additives (aroma, flavouring) had lower the IC50 and the lower viability of BHK-21 cells. So, Additives in the propolis food supplement might be an effective factor on cell viability as much as dilution factor and propolis content.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, S., PARMAKSIZ, A., SAİT, A., KORKMAZ, B. İ. O. (2022). The analysis of the effects of propolis products as food supplements on the viability of baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) and murine macrophage (RAW 264.7) cells by spectrophotometric MTT assay. Journal of advances in vetbio science and techniques, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 45–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/676850

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Valcic, S., Montenegro, G., Mujica, A., Avila, G., Franzblau, S., Singh, M., Maiese, W. & Timmermann, B. (1999).
  2. Phytochemical, Morphological, and Biological Investigations of Propolis from Central Chile. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C, 54(5-6), 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1999-5-617
  3. Gojmerac W. (1980). Bees, beekeeping, honey and pollination. Westport, USA: A VI publishing Inc, Burdock G. A. (1998). Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis). Food and Chemical Toxicology, 36(4), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00145-2
  4. Yaghoubi, M., & Ghorbani, G., & Soleymanianzad, S., & Sattari, R. (2007). Antimicrobial activity of iranian propolis and its chemical composition. Daru Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, 15(1), 45-48.
  5. Markham, K.R., Mitchell, K., Wilkins, A., Daldy, J.A., & Lu, Y. (1996). HPLC and GC-MS identification of the major organic constituents in New Zealand propolis. Phytochemistry, 42, 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(96)83286-9
  6. Sforcin, J. M., Fernandes, A., Jr, Lopes, C. A., Bankova, V., & Funari, S. R. (2000). Seasonal effect on Brazilian propolis antibacterial activity. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 73(1-2), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8741(00)00320-2
  7. Al-Shaher, A., Wallace, J., Agarwal, S., Bretz, W., & Baugh, D. (2004). Effect of propolis on human fibroblasts from the pulp and periodontal ligament. Journal of Endodontics, 30(5), 359–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00012
  8. Bedier, M. M. (2016). Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate with or without propolis extract on the proliferation of fibroblast cell line. Tanta Dental Journal, 13(4), 208. Martini, A.A.K., & Mahendra, A. N. (2019). Administration of 50% propolis ethanolic extract increases the number of gingivitis fibroblast in H2O2 -induced rats. AIP Conference Proceedings 2019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5110021
  9. Bogdanov, S. (2014). Propolis: Composition, Health, Medicine: A Review. Bee Product Science, 1-40.
  10. Berretta, A., Silveira, M.D., Capcha, J.M., & Jong, D.D. (2020). Propolis and its potential against SARS-CoV-2 infection mechanisms and COVID-19 disease. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 131, 110622 - 110622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110622
  11. Moussa, M., & Temirek, M. (2018). Biological effect of Egyptian Propolis on BHK cell line and on dental pulp tissue (An In vitro And In vivo study). Egyptian Dental Journal, 64, 2161-2170. https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2018.76780
  12. Cox, C. F., Berge