SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Sayı: 23

TÜRKİYE EKONOMİSİNDE POZİTİF VE NEGATİF PARA POLİTİKASI ŞOKLARININ ASİMETRİK ETKİLERİ

Etem Hakan Ergeç
Pages
1–1
Publication Date
2015-06-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This result supports the view of demand side asymmetry

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this paper is to investigate the asymmetric effects of positive and negative monetary policy shocks on output and prices in Turkish economy for the period of 1990-2006.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Using two-step OLS method, it is found that the negative shocks have grater effects on output and prices than positive shocks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This result supports the view of demand side asymmetry
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Asimetrik etki · pozitif ve negative şok asimetrisi · para politikası şoku .para politikası

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the asymmetric effects of positive and negative monetary policy shocks on output and prices in Turkish economy for the period of 1990-2006. Using two-step OLS method, it is found that the negative shocks have grater effects on output and prices than positive shocks. This result supports the view of demand side asymmetry

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye ekonomisinde 1990–2006 döneminde pozitif ve negatif para politikası şoklarının, çıktı ve fiyatlar üzerindeki asimetrik etkilerini incelemektir. Çalışmada iki aşamalı OLS yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Negatif şokların, çıktı ve fiyatlar üzerinde pozitif şoklara göre daha güçlü etkileri olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu sonuç, talep yönlü asimetri görüşünü desteklemektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

Ergeç, E. H. (2015). TÜRKİYE EKONOMİSİNDE POZİTİF VE NEGATİF PARA POLİTİKASI ŞOKLARININ ASİMETRİK ETKİLERİ. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Sayı: 23, 1–1. https://ajindex.com/articles/660436

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Agénor, Pierre-Rchard (2001). “The Asymmetric Effects of Monetary http://www1.worldbank.org/wbiep/macro- program/agenor/pdfs /Asym-VARs.pdf, April. Shocks”,
  2. Ball, Laurence and M. Mankiw (1994). “Asymmetric Price
  3. Adjustment and Economic Fluctuations,” Economic Journal, 104, 276-261. Bernanke, Ben S. and Mark, Getrler (1989). “Agency Cost,
  4. Net Worth and Business Fluctuations,” American Economic Review, Vol. 79, No 1, 13-31. Caballero, Ricardo J. and Eduardo M.R.A., Engel (1992). “Price
  5. Fluctuations,” Working Paper, NBER, No. 4091.
  6. Cover, James Peery (1992). “Asymmetric Effects of Positive and Negative Money-Supply Shocks,” The Quarterly
  7. Journal of Economics, Vol.107, No.4, 1261-1282.
  8. De Long, B. Summers. L., Lawrence. H., Mankiw. N., Gregory. and Chiristina D., Romer (1988). “How Does
  9. Macroeconomic Policy Affect Output,” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1988, No. 2, 433-494.
  10. Demery, David. and Duck, Nigel (2000). “Asymmetric
  11. Effects of Aggregate Demand: An Empirical Test of a Menu-Cost Model,” Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 22, No. 1, 14-23. Dressler, Scott (2004). “The Asymmetry of the Bank Lending Channel,” http://www.eco.utexas.edu/~dressler/_private/blcfin.pdf, Febuary.
  12. Evans, Paul (1986). “Does the Potency of Monetary Policy
  13. Vary with Capacity Utilization?,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 24, Spring. Florio, Anna (2004). “The Asymmetric Effects of Monetary
  14. Policy,” Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 18, No. 3, 409-4
  15. Friedman, Milton. and A. Jacobson, Shwartz. (1990). A
  16. Monetary History of The United States, Random Hause, New York, Eight Paperback Printing. Garibaldi, Pietro (1997). “The Asymmetric Effects of
  17. Monetary Policy on Job Creation and Destruction,” IMF Working Paper, No. 97/57. Gür, Ekin Toksöz (2003). “Kredi Kanalının Etkin Çalışması ve Türkiye Uygulaması”, Yayınlanmamış Uzmanlık
  18. Yeterlilik Tezi. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası Bankacılık ve Finansal Kuruluşlar Genel Müdürlüğü. Hill, R. Carter. William E., Griffiths. and George G., Judge. (2001). Undergraduate Econometrics, John Wiley ve Sons Şirketi Yayınları.
  19. Jackman, Richard. and John, Sutton (1982). “Imperfect
  20. Capital Markets and the Monaterist Black Box: Liquidity Constraints, Inflation and the Asymmetric Effects of Interest Rate Policy,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 92, 108-128. Kandil, Magda (1995). “Asymetric Nominal Flexibility and Economic Fluctuation,” Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 61, No. 3, 674-695.
  21. Kandil, Magda (2002). “Asymmetry in the Effects of Government Monetary
  22. Contrasting Evidence and Implications,” Economic Inquiry, Vol.40, No. 2, 288-313. Spending Shocks: Karras, Georgias (1996). “Why Are The Efects of Money
  23. Supply Shocks Asymmetric? Convex Aggregate Supply or Pushing on a String?,” Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol: 18, No. 4, 605-620. Karras, Georgias and Houston H., Stokes. (a) (1999). “Why
  24. Are the Effects of Money-supply Shocks Asymmetric? Evidence from Prices, Consumption and Investment,” Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 21, 731-727. Karras, Georgias. and Houston H., Stokes. (b) (1999). “On
  25. The Asymmetric Effects of Money-supply Shocks: International Evidence from a Panel of OECD Countries,” Applied Economics, 31, 227-235. Kaufmann, Sylvia (2002). “Is there an Asymmetric Effect of
  26. Monetary Policy over Time? A Bayesian Analysis Using Austrian Data,” Empirical Economics, Vol. 27, 277-2
  27. Lenz, C. (1997). “Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Policy in
  28. Switzerland,” Swiss Journalof Economics and Statistics, Vol. 133, 441-454. Macklem, Tiff. Alain, Paquet. and Louis, Phaneuf (1996).
  29. “Asymmetric Effets of Monetary Policy: Evidence from the Yield Curve,” Centre for Research on Economic Fluctuations and Employment (CREFE) Working Papaer, No. 42, Agust. Malone, M. Stokes (2000). “An Investigation of Money
  30. Supply Shock Asymmetry Using Disaggregate Data,” Department of Economics East Carolina Universty M.S. Research Paper, July. Morgan, Donalp P. (1993). “Asymmetric Effects of Monetary
  31. Policy,” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, Vol. 78, No. 2, 21-33. Parker, Randall E. and Philip, Rothman (2003). “An
  32. Examination of the Asymmetric Effects of Money Supply Shocks in the Pre-World War I and Interwar Periods,” Working Paper East Carolina University, Department of Economics, May. O. Ravn, Morten and Martin, Reconsideration of the Emprical Evidence on the Asymmetric Effects of Money-Supply Shocks: Positive vs. Negative or Big vs. Small?,” Working Paper Universitat Pompeu Farba. Sola (1999). “A
  33. Rhee, Wooheon (1995). “Asymmetric Effects of Money on
  34. Inflation: Evidence From Korean Data,” International Economic Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, 31- 43. Rhee, Wooheon. and R., Rich (1995). “Inflation and the Asymmetric Effects of Money on Output Fluctuations,”
  35. Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 17, Issue, 4, 683-792. Senda, Takashi (2001). “The Asymmetric Effects of Money
  36. Supply Shocks and Trend Inflation,” The Journal of Money Credit and Banking, Vol. 33, No. 1, 65-89. Thoma, M. (1994). “Subsample Instability and Asymmetries in Money-Income Causality,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 64, 279-306.
  37. Tsiddon, Daniel (1993). “The (Mis) Behaviour of the Aggregate Price Level,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 60, 889-902.
  38. Değişkenlere ilişkin t değerleri parantez içinde gösterilmiştir. *, **, *** sırasıyla %10, %5 ve %1 anlam düzeylerinde anlamlı değişkenleri göstermektedir. Aynı bilgi, fiyatlara ilişkin denklemler için de geçerlidir. Para Politikası Şoklarının Fiyatlar Üzerindeki Etkisi i Şokları 2001-2006 i Şokları 1990-2006 Değişkenler Katsayı
  39. Değişkenlere ilişkin t değerleri parantez içinde gösterilmiştir. *, **, *** sırasıyla %10, %5 ve %1 anlam düzeylerinde anlamlı değişkenleri göstermektedir. Aynı bilgi, fiyatlara ilişkin denklemler için de geçerlidir.