SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Seleucia (ad Calycadnum) / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 11

Building-in Time: Th e Complicated Lives of Roman Civic Structures in Asia Minor

Zaman İçinde İnşaat: Küçük Asya’daki Roma Kentsel Yapılarının Karmaşık Yaşamları

Diane FAVRO
Pages
11–32
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Simultaneously, bustling construction sites and in-progress structures entertained the populace and continuously affi rmed Roman cultural values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Th e cities of Roman Asia Minor are known for impressive public buildings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Scholarship has frequently focused on an imagined fi nal state for such structures, yet as enduring, costly undertakings these architectural projects lived complicated lives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Simultaneously, bustling construction sites and in-progress structures entertained the populace and continuously affi rmed Roman cultural values.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Th e cities of Roman Asia Minor are known for impressive public buildings. Scholarship has frequently focused on an imagined fi nal state for such structures, yet as enduring, costly undertakings these architectural projects lived complicated lives. Th ey evolved from original creation through repairs, alterations, reuse, destruction, rebuilding, decay, and demolition over many years. Multiple acts of building in prominent locations disrupted urban activities, blocking traffi c while generating noise and dust. Simultaneously, bustling construction sites and in-progress structures entertained the populace and continuously affi rmed Roman cultural values.

Özet

Roma Küçük Asya’sı etkileyici kentsel yapılarıyla tanınır. Bilimsel çalışmalar hep bu yapıların son ve bitmiş hallerine odaklanmakta; ancak uzun ömürlü ve pahalı girişimler sonucu oluşturulan bu mimari projeler aslında karmaşık hayatlar sürmektedirler. Söz konusu yapılar, özgün hallerini izleyen süreçte bakımlarla, yapılan devşirmelerle, tahribat ve ardından gelen onarımlarla, zaman içinde eskimeleriyle ve yıkımlarla değişmektedirler. Kimi kesimlerde, inşaat etkinlikleri kentsel yaşamı etkileyebilmekte; trafiği engellemekte, gürültü ve toz toprak oluşturmaktadır. Ama bir yandan da hareketli inşaat alanları ve yapımı sürmekte olan binalar, halkın ilgisini çekmekte ve Roma kültürel değerlerini sürekli olarak desteklemektedirler

🔖

Cite This Article

FAVRO, D. (2022). Building-in Time: Th e Complicated Lives of Roman Civic Structures in Asia Minor. Seleucia (ad Calycadnum), Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 11, 11–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/654087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Barker 2010
  2. Barker, S., “Roman builders - pillagers or salvagers? Th e economics of deconstruction and reuse”, in Arqueología de la construcción: II, Los procesos constructivos en el mundo romano: Italia y provincias occidentales, S. Camporeale, H. Dessales and A. Pizzo, eds. (Madrid), 127-142. Brand 1994
  3. Brand, S., How buildings learn: what happens after they’re built, New York. Burns 2017
  4. Burns, R., Origins of the Colonnaded Streets in the Cities of the Roman East, Oxford. Capelle 2017
  5. Capelle, J., “Les épures du théâtre de Milet: pratiques de chantiers antiques”, Bulletin de correspondance hellénique, École française d’Athènes, 141(2), 769- 820. Capelle 2019
  6. Capelle, J., “Ancient Blueprints: New Prospects and Interpretations in Light of Recent Discoveries”, New Directions and Paradigms for the Study of Greek Architecture, P. Sapirstein and D. Scahill eds. (Leiden), 56-73. Chaniotis 2012
  7. Chaniotis, A., “Graffi ti in Aphrodisias: Images—Texts—Contexts”, in Ancient Graffi ti in Context, J. Baird and C. Taylor eds. (New York), 191-207. Chatterjee 2018
  8. Chatterjee, P., “Iconoclasm’s Legacy: Interpreting the Trier Ivory”, Th e Art Bulletin, 100(3), 28-47. Corso 2016
  9. Corso, A., Drawings in Greek and Roman Architecture, Oxford. Dessales 2017
  10. Dessales, H., “L’archéologie de la construction: Une nouvelle approche de l’architecture romaine”, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 72, 75-94. Edgerton 1999
  11. Edgerton, D., “From innovation to use: Ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology”, History and Technology, 16(2), 111-136. Favro 2011
  12. Favro, D., “‘If the axle breaks, what is left of their bodies?’ Construction traffi c in Ancient Rome: Building the Arch of Septimius Severus”, in Rome, Ostia, Pompeii: Movement and Space, R. Laurence and D. Newsome (New York), 332- 360. Grawehr 2019
  13. Grawehr, M., “Looking at the Unfi nished: Roughed-Out Ornamentation in Building-in Time: Th e Complicated Lives of Roman Civic Structures in Asia Minor Greek Architecture”, in New Directions and Paradigms for the Study of Greek Architecture, P. Sapirstein and D. Scahill eds. (Leiden), 229-239.
  14. Haron, Al Adarbeh, and Lash 2019
  15. Haron, J., N. Al Adarbeh, and A. Lash, “Bayt Ras: Founding the Roman City”, ACOR Newsletter 31(2). Haselberger 1985
  16. Haselberger, L., “Th e Construction Plans for the Temple of Apollo at Didyma” Scientifi c American 253(6), 126-132. Inglese 2016
  17. Inglese, C., “I tracciati di cantiere nelle province romane dell’Asia Minore”, in I Tracciati di Cantiere, Dis