Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

The role of trust for the manager in the effect of organizational justice on organizational silence

Örgütsel adaletin örgütsel sessizliğe etkisinde yöneticiyeduyulan güvenin düzenleyici rolü

Pages
956–975
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the sense of trustthat academicians have to their

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, everyone knows that change is an element that every organization should consider.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, in the light of the dataobtained from 236 academicians, the moderating effect of trust to the manager in the relationshipbetween the perceptions of academicians of organizational justice and organizational silencebehaviours was investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the sense of trustthat academicians have to their
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Today, everyone knows that change is an element that every organization should consider. Asorganizations that provide human capital to the sectors, universities should have an organizationalclimate structure that constantly renews itself with this change. For this, organizational structures inwhich creative ideas are produced and everyone participates in the decisions, that is, the employeesdo not fall into an organizational silence are needed. For this purpose, universities need to create apositive perception of organizational justice that will facilitate the foundation for all these and thatacademics trust their managers who will create this environment. In this study, in the light of the dataobtained from 236 academicians, the moderating effect of trust to the manager in the relationshipbetween the perceptions of academicians of organizational justice and organizational silencebehaviours was investigated. In the study, correlation and regression analyses revealed the relationsbetween the variables and their effects, and the regulatory effect was also tested with a regressioncurve. According to the findings obtained, the increase in the perceptions of academicians oforganizational justice reduces their organizational silence behaviours. In addition, the sense of trustthat academicians have to their

Özet

Günümüzde herkes değişimin her örgüt tarafından dikkat edilmesi gereken bir unsur olduğunu bilmektedir. Üniversiteler de sektörlere insan sermayesi sağlayan örgütler olarak bu değişim karşısında kendini sürekli yenileyen bir örgüt iklimi yapısına sahip olmalıdır. Bunun için yaratıcı fikirlerin üretildiği, herkesin kararlara katıldığı, kısacası çalışanların ses çıkarıp örgütsel sessizliğe bürünmediği örgüt yapılarına ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu maksatla tüm bunlara zemin oluşturmayı kolaylaştıracak olumlu örgütsel adalet algısının oluşturulması ve akademisyenlerin bu ortamı oluşturacak yöneticilerine güven duyması üniversiteler için hayati öneme sahiptir. Bu çalışmada 236 akademisyenden elde edilen veriler ışığında; akademisyenlerin örgütsel adalet algıları ile örgütsel sessizlik davranışları arasındaki ilişkide yöneticiye duyulan güvenin düzenleyici etkisi araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada değişkenler arası ilişkiler ve etkileri korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri ile ortayakonulmuş, düzenleyici etki regresyon eğrisi ile ayrıca sınanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre,akademisyenlerin örgütsel adalet algılarındaki artış, örgütsel sessizlik davranışlarını azaltmaktadır.Bunun yanı sıra akademisyenlerin yöneticilerine duydukları güven duygusu örgütsel adalet algılarıile örgütsel sessizlik davranışları arasındaki ilişkide düzenleyici rol üstlenmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARA, A. U., BEĞENİRBAŞ, M. (2022). The role of trust for the manager in the effect of organizational justice on organizational silence. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 956–975. https://ajindex.com/articles/649219

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. (Ed. Berkowitz, L.). In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, 267-299.
  2. Alkayış, L. (2015). Mobbing ve Örgütsel Sessizliğin Çalışanların Motivasyonu Üzerine Etkisi.Yayımlanmamış Yükseklisans Tezi, İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  3. Alsalem, M., & Alhaiani, A. (2007). Relationship between Organizational Justice and Employees Performance. Aledari, March, (108), 97-110.
  4. Aryee, P. S., Budhwar, Z. & Chen, X. (2002). Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of A Social Exchange Model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23 (3), 267-285.
  5. Aylsworth, J. (2008). Change in the Workplace: Organizational Silence Can be Dangerous. Organizational Psychology Examiner. Erişim adresi: http://www.examiner.com.
  6. Bagheri, G., Zarei, R., & Aeen, M. N. (2012). Organizational Silence Basic Concepts and Its Development Factors. Ideal Type of Management, 1, 50. Bakiev, E. (2013). The Influence of Interpersonal Trust and Organizational Commitment on Perceived Organizational Performance. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 3(3), 166-180.
  7. Baldwin, S. (2006). Organizational Justice. Institute for Employment Studies, 1-13. Baron R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173-82.
  8. Beugre, C. D. (1998). Implementing Business Process Reengineering: The Role of Organizational Justice. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34(3), 347-360.
  9. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). A Four-Component Model of Procedural Justice: Defining the Meaning of a “Fair” Process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (6), 747-758.
  10. Blau, P. (1964). Power and Exchange in Social Life. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43-55.
  11. Binikos, E. (2010). Sounds of Silence: Organizational Trust and Decisions to Blow The Whistle. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34(3), 48-59.
  12. Brinsfield, C. (2009) Employee Silence: Investigation of Dimensionality, Development of Measures, And Examinatıon of Related Factors Dissertation, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ohio State University. Brinsfield, C. T., Edwards, M. S., & Greenberg, J. (2009). Voice and Silence in Orga