SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Verimlilik Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 3

Quality confusion in health services multidimensional quality modal in health services

Sağlık hizmetlerinde kalite karmaşası: “Sağlık hizmetleri çok boyutlu kalite modeli”

İbrahim H. KAYRAL
Pages
65–81
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this framework, quality is defined in health services and evaluation of health service quality is discussed within a modal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:"What” is the expectation of quality in health services and "how" quality should be evaluated in health services delivery, is one of the subjects among ongoing discussions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As the issue of quality in health care are examined in the literature, so many concepts come up as perceived quality, technical quality, customer quality, organization quality, clinical quality and service quality, however the use of these concepts in practical life and their relationships with each other may be perceived differently(Donabedian 1980; Ovretveit, 1998; Carman 2000; Rose, Uli, Abdul veLooi Ng: 2004).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this framework, quality is defined in health services and evaluation of health service quality is discussed within a modal.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

"What” is the expectation of quality in health services and "how" quality should be evaluated in health services delivery, is one of the subjects among ongoing discussions. As the issue of quality in health care are examined in the literature, so many concepts come up as perceived quality, technical quality, customer quality, organization quality, clinical quality and service quality, however the use of these concepts in practical life and their relationships with each other may be perceived differently(Donabedian 1980; Ovretveit, 1998; Carman 2000; Rose, Uli, Abdul veLooi Ng: 2004). In this framework, quality is defined in health services and evaluation of health service quality is discussed within a modal.

Özet

Sağlık hizmetlerinde kaliteli hizmet sunumunun ya da hizmetlerin kaliteli olmasına dair duyulan beklentilerin gerçekte “ne” olduğu ve “nasıl” değerlendirilmesi gerektiği, üzerinde tartışmaların devam ettiği konular arasında yer almaktadır. Sağlık hizmetlerinde kalite literatürü incelendiğinde algılanan kalite, teknik kalite, müşteri kalitesi, organizasyon kalitesi, klinik kalite, hizmet kalitesi vb. birçok kalite kavramının ele alındığı görülmekte, ancak pratik hayatta bu kavramların kullanımı ve birbirleriyle ilişkileri farklı farklı algılanabilmektedir (Donabedian 1980; Ovretveit, 1998; Carman 2000; Rose, Uli, Abdul ve LooiNg: 2004). Ele alınan çerçevede, çalışmada sağlık hizmetlerinde kalitenin tanımı yapılmaya ve sağlık hizmetleri kalitesinin ne şekilde değerlendirilebileceği, ortaya konulan bir model ile tartışılmaya çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYRAL, İ. H. (2022). Quality confusion in health services multidimensional quality modal in health services. Verimlilik Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 3, 65–81. https://ajindex.com/articles/646183

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Accredittation Canada International (2012),
  2. ACI Publications. ARDIÇ, K. ve A. GÜLER, (2000), “Reklamlarda Vurgulanan Ürün ve Hizmet Kalite Boyutlarının Belirlenmesi ve Bir Uygulama, Pazarlama Dünyası”, Cilt. pp. 18 - 23, ISSN: DOI. •Birleşik Devletler Sağlık Departmanı Sağlık Araştırmaları ve Kalite Birimi (2012), “Understanding Health Care Quality” http://www.ahrq.gov/ consumer/guidetoq/guidetoq4.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 30.11.2012). •BLUMENTHAL, D, (1996), “Part 1: Quality of care – what is it?”, The New England Journal of Medicine, 335(12): 891–894. •BOWERS, M.R. and J.E. SWAN, W. KOEHLER, (1994), “What Attributes Determine Quality and Satisfaction with Health Care Delivery”, Health Care Management Review, 19(4), s. 49–55. •BROGOWICZ, A.A.-DELENE, L.M. - LYTH, D.M., (1990), “A Synthesised Service Quality Model with Managerial Implications”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 27-45. • BROOK, R. - MCGLYNN, E - CLEARY, P., (1996), “Measuring Quality of Care” The New England Journal of Medicine, 335(13): 966–970. • CARMAN, JAMES. M., (1990), “Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality: An Assessment of SERVQUAL Dimensions”, Journal of Retailing, 66(1), s.33-35. • CARMAN, JAMES M., (2000), “Patient Perceptions of Service Quality: Combining the Dimensions”, Journal of Management of Medicine, v.14, n.5/6, s.339-356. • CLEMMER T. P. and SPUHLER, V.J., ONİKİ, T.A., HORN S.D., (1999), “Results of a collaborative quality improvement program on out comesandcosts in a tertiary critical careunit”, Crit Care Med; 27: 1768-74. • CRONIN, J.J. and TAYLOR, S.A., (1992), “Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension”, Journal of Marketing, 56 (July), s: 55-68. • CRONIN, J.J. and TAYLOR, S.A., (1994), “Servperf Versus Servqual: Reconcilling Performance-Basedand Perceptions Minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Ouality”, Journal of Marketing, Vol: 58, No: 1, s: 125-131. • CRUMP, Bernard and ADIL, Mahmood, (2009), “Arguethatthere is nothing inevitable about loss of quality or productivity in a ‘flat budget’ environment. Can quality and productivity improve in a financially poorer NHS?” Brtish Medical Journal, 339: b4638. • CUNNİNGHAM L., (1991), “The Quality Connection in Health Care: Integrating Patient Satisfaction and Risk Management”, Jossey-Bass Publishers (San Francisco) 1st edition. • Department of Health, (1997), “A First Class Service – Quality in The New NHS”, London, Department of Health. • DONABEDİAN, A., (1988), “The