Journals / Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi / 2022 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 2

The Impact of Gender Characteristics of Online Food and Beverage Brands on Brand Usage Intent and Purchase Intention

Online Yiyecek İçecek Markalarının Cinsiyet Özelliklerinin Marka Kullanım Niyeti ve Satın Alma Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkisi

Pages
1315–1334
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The relevant study underlined the impact of brand gender characteristics on brand usage intent and purchase intention and the effects of consumer gender characteristics on model correlations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aims not only to determine the impact of brand gender on brand usage intent and purchase intention, but also to investigate the influence of consumer gender characteristics on research model relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The model was tested with surveys applied to a sample of 460 online food and beverage shoppers in Istanbul, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The relevant study underlined the impact of brand gender characteristics on brand usage intent and purchase intention and the effects of consumer gender characteristics on model correlations.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present study aims not only to determine the impact of brand gender on brand usage intent and purchase intention, but also to investigate the influence of consumer gender characteristics on research model relationships. This empirical study was conducted with a proposed model. The model was tested with surveys applied to a sample of 460 online food and beverage shoppers in Istanbul, Turkey. Regression analyses were conducted to test the research hypotheses. The study findings elicited the impact of feminine brand gender characteristic on brand usage intent and purchase intention, and masculine brand gender characteristic on only brand usage intent. Furthermore, the present study deepened the understanding of the influence of consumer gender personality traits on study correlations in the form of feminine and masculine genders. As a result of these effects, men intend to use masculine brands more, women intend to use feminine brands more, men intend to buy only masculine brands and women intend to buy only feminine brands. The relevant study underlined the impact of brand gender characteristics on brand usage intent and purchase intention and the effects of consumer gender characteristics on model correlations.

Özet

Bu çalışma, marka cinsiyetinin marka kullanım niyeti ve satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisini ve aynı zamanda erkekler ve kadınların araştırma modelindeki ilişkilere bakış açılarını araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu ampirik çalışma önerilen bir model ile yürütülmüştür. Model İstanbul’da yaşayan ve çevrimiçi yiyecek içecek markalarından ve platformlarından alışveriş yapanlar arasından 460 kişi üzerinde uygulanan anketlerle test edilmiştir. Araştırma hipotezlerini test etmek için regresyon analizleri yapılmıştır. Çalışma bulguları, dişil marka cinsiyeti özelliğinin marka kullanım niyeti ve satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisini ve eril marka cinsiyeti özelliğinin sadece marka kullanım niyeti üzerinde etkili olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Ayrıca, bu çalışma araştırma modelindeki ilişkilerde eril ve dişil tüketicilerin cinsiyeti özelliklerinin etkilerine derinleşmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda erkeklerin daha çok eril markaları kullanım niyetinde oldukları, kadınların daha çok dişil markaları kullanım niyetinde oldukları, erkeklerin sadece eril markaları satın alma niyetinde oldukları ve kadınların sadece dişil markaları satın alma niyetinde oldukları görülmüştür. İlgili çalışmaya özgünlük kazandıran, marka cinsiyeti özelliklerinin marka kullanım niyeti ve satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisi ve değişkenler arasındaki ilişkilerde tüketicilerin cinsiyet özelliklerinin etkileri olmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALİZADEHFANAELOO, P. (2022). The Impact of Gender Characteristics of Online Food and Beverage Brands on Brand Usage Intent and Purchase Intention. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 2, 1315–1334. https://ajindex.com/articles/645573

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aaker, J. (1997). “Dimensions of brand personality”, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356.
  2. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
  3. Allison, N. K., Golden, L. L., Mullet, G. M., & Coogan, D. (1980). Sex-typed product images: The effects of sex, sex role self-concept and measurement implications. Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 604-609.
  4. Alreck, P. L., Settle, R. B., & Belch, M. A. (1982). Who responds to" gendered" ads, and how? Masculine brands versus feminine brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 22 (April/May), 25-31.
  5. Altuna, O. K., ve Konuk, F. A. (2009). Understanding consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising and its impact on consumers' behavioral intentions: A cross-market comparison of United States and Turkish consumers. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 4(2), 43-51.
  6. Avery, J. (2012). “Defending the markers of masculinity: Consumer resistance to brand gender bending”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 322-336.
  7. Azar, S. L. (2015). “Toward an understanding of brand sexual associations”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, 24(1), 43–56.
  8. Azar, S. L., Aimé, I., ve Ulrich, I. (2018). “Brand gender-bending: The impact of an endorsed brand strategy on consumers’ evaluation of gendered mixed-target brands”, European Journal of Marketing, 52(7/8), 1598–1624.
  9. Batra, R., Lehmann, D. R., ve Singh, D. (1993), The brand personality component of brand goodwill: some antecedents and consequences, In Asker, David A & Biel Alexander L.(Eds.), Brand equity and advertising, Hillsdale, NJ: Law-rence Erlbaum Associates. Bem, S. L. (1983). Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: Raising gender aschematic children in a gender-schematic society. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 8(4), 598-616.
  10. Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., ve Engel, J. F. (2001). Consumer behavior 9th. South-Western Thomas Learning. Mason, OH. USA: South-Western Thomson Learning. Bourdieu, P. (2001).
  11. Masculine domination. Redwood, CA: Stanford University Press.
  12. Brewer, M. B., ve Lui, L. N. (1989). The primacy of age and sex in the structure of person categories. Social Cognition, 7(3), 262–274.
  13. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.
  14. Carnevale, M., Luna, D., ve Lerman, D.