Journals / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE ÖĞRENEN ÖRGÜTLER: BÜTÜNLEŞTİRİCİ BİR ÇERÇEVE

ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND LEARNING ORGANIZATIONS: AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK

Pages
439–460
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is further noted that taking the tensions identified in this paper into account will provide organizations with many benefits and enhance both their dynamic knowledge renewal and learning capacity in relation to organizational goals

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper brings together fundamental theories and widely-accepted frameworks on organizational learning and learning organizations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Summarizing literature, debates and critiques in these two vast literature domains, the paper proposes an integrative framework that highlights the dynamics of organizational learning and learning organizations, and guides both academia and practitioners for a learning oriented change process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is further noted that taking the tensions identified in this paper into account will provide organizations with many benefits and enhance both their dynamic knowledge renewal and learning capacity in relation to organizational goals
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper brings together fundamental theories and widely-accepted frameworks on organizational learning and learning organizations. Summarizing literature, debates and critiques in these two vast literature domains, the paper proposes an integrative framework that highlights the dynamics of organizational learning and learning organizations, and guides both academia and practitioners for a learning oriented change process. By using the framework, it is suggested that organizations will be capable of acting wisely, and managing the learning and change processes effectively, and hence, they will be in control of their actions. It is further noted that taking the tensions identified in this paper into account will provide organizations with many benefits and enhance both their dynamic knowledge renewal and learning capacity in relation to organizational goals

Özet

Bu makalede örgütsel öğrenme ve öğrenen örgütler üzerine geliştirilmiş temel teoriler ve genel kabul gören çerçeveler bir araya getirilmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında, ilgili yazın, tartışma ve eleştiriler özetlenerek, örgütsel öğrenme ve öğrenen örgütlere ilişkin dinamikleri öne çıkaran, akademi ve iş dünyasına öğrenme odaklı bir değişim süreci için yön gösteren bütünleştirici bir çerçeve önerilmektedir. Değişim ve öğrenme süreçlerinde, önerilen çerçevenin rehber alınarak izlenmesi neticesinde, örgütlerin daha bilinçli hareket edeceği, süreçleri daha etkin ve kontrollü bir şekilde yönetecekleri öngörülmektedir. Tanımlanan gerilimlerin değerlendirilmesinin örgüt yararına hizmet edeceği, örgütsel bilginin dinamik olarak güncellenmesi ve öğrenme kapasitesinin hedefler doğrultusunda artırılmasına katkı sağlayacağı belirtilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ESEN, A., EGE, T., DİZDAR, Ö. A. (2022). ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME VE ÖĞRENEN ÖRGÜTLER: BÜTÜNLEŞTİRİCİ BİR ÇERÇEVE. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 439–460. https://ajindex.com/articles/645429

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 99-109.
  2. Argyris, C. (2002). Double loop learning, teaching, and research. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(2), 206-218.
  3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: a Theory of Action-Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Ashton, D. (1994). Business schools as learning companies. In J. Burgoyne, M. Pedler, and T. Boydell (eds), Towards the Learning Company: Concepts and Practice. England: McGraw-Hill. Bapuji, H. B., & Crossan, M. M. (2003). From raising questions to providing answers: Reviewing organizational learning research. Paper presented at the 5th International Organizational Learning and Knowledge Conference at Lancaster University. Bateson. G. (1973). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. London: Paladin. Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133-141.
  4. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
  5. Burgoyne, J. (1994). Established and emergent learning company concepts and practices. In J. Burgoyne, M. Pedler, and T. Boydell (eds), Towards the Learning Company: Concepts and Practice. England: McGraw-Hill. Burgoyne, J., Pedler, M., & Boydell, T. (eds) (1994). Towards the Learning Company: Concepts and Practice. England: McGraw-Hill. Chaston, I., Badger, B., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2001). Organizational learning: An empirical assessment of process in small UK manufacturing firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(2), 139-151.
  6. Coopey, J., & Burgoyne, J. (2000). Politics and organizational learning. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 869-885.
  7. Crossan, M., (2003). Altering theories of learning and action: An interview with Chris Argyris. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2): 40-46.
  8. Crossan, M., & Guatto, T. (1996). Organizational learning research profile. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(1), 107-112.
  9. Crossan, M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537.
  10. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., White, R. E., & Djurfeldt. (1995). Organizational learning: Dimensions for a theory. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(4), 337-360.
  11. Dodgson, M. (1991). Technology learning; technology strategy and competitive pressures. British