SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEAM WORK AND PERSONALITY TRAITS: AN APPLICATION IN SECURITY SERVICES

TAKIM ÇALIŞMASI İLE KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ ARSASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: GÜVENLİK HİZMETLERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Haydar PEKDOĞAN
Pages
2379–2392
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to thecorrelation analysis results, there was no statistically significant relationship between team workperceiving and personality types (p> 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Individual characteristics and person-focused approaches are increasingly important in moderndomestic security services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Survey was conducted on n = 403 gendarmeriepersonnel in charge of Tunceli Gendarmerie Command between January and May 2018 in thisframework.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to thecorrelation analysis results, there was no statistically significant relationship between team workperceiving and personality types (p> 0.05).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Individual characteristics and person-focused approaches are increasingly important in moderndomestic security services. Besides, security services are generally a team work perceiving, and itcan be said that the propensity for team spirit indicates the success in security services at thesame time. In this research, it is aimed to examine the relationship between gendarmerie staffand team work perceiving and personality traits. Survey was conducted on n = 403 gendarmeriepersonnel in charge of Tunceli Gendarmerie Command between January and May 2018 in thisframework. According to the findings of the research, different personality traits and team workperceiving levels did not show a statistically significant difference according to the demographiccharacteristics of the personnel participating in the research (p> 0.05). According to thecorrelation analysis results, there was no statistically significant relationship between team workperceiving and personality types (p> 0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

PEKDOĞAN, H. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEAM WORK AND PERSONALITY TRAITS: AN APPLICATION IN SECURITY SERVICES. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34, 2379–2392. https://ajindex.com/articles/644591

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Beverborg, A. O. G., Sleegers, P. J. C. and Veen, K. (2015). “Fostering teacher learning in VET colleges: Do leadership and teamwork matter?”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48 (2015) 22-33.
  2. Bilgin, L. (1998). Örgütsel Yaşamda Olumsuz Duygular ve Bireysel Başa Çıkma Yolları. Eğitim, Sağlık ve Bilimsel Araştırma Çalışmaları Vakfı Yayınları, No: 137, Eskişehir. Blanco, A. F., Echaluce, M. L. S., Penalvo, F. J. G. and Conde, M. A. (2015). “Using Learning Analytics to improve teamwork assessment”. Computers in Human Behavior, 47(2015), 149–156.
  3. Chan, S.C.H. and Mak, W. M. (2014). “Team Identification and Interpersonal Helping Behavior in Work Teams: A Hotel Industry Study”. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 13(1), 17-33.
  4. Chen, C. A. and Rainey, H. G. (2014). “Personnel Formalization and the Enhancement Of Teamwork: A public– private comparison”. Public Management Review, 16:7, 945-968.
  5. Durna, U. (2005). A Tipi Ve B Tipi Kişilik Yapilari ve Bu Kişilik Yapilarini Etkileyen Faktörlerle İlgili Bir Araştirma”. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 275-290.
  6. Eliasa, E. I. (2014). “Increasing Values of Teamwork and Responsibility of The Students Through Games: Integrating Education Character in Lectures”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123 ( 2014 ) 196 – 203. Fernández, J. R. M., Corcelles, M. and Cerrato-Lara, M. (2011). “The Conceptions about Teamwork Questionnaire: design, reliability and validity with secondary students”. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31:7, 857-871.
  7. Hazar, Ç. M. (2006). “Kişilik ve İletişim Tipleri”, Selçuk İletişim, 4(2), 125-140.
  8. Kankaew, V. and Wannapiroon, P. (2015). “System analysis of virtual team in cloud computing to enhance teamwork skills of undergraduate students”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174 ( 2015 ) 4096 – 4102. Mierlo, H., Rutte, C. G., Vermunt, J. K., Kompier, M. A. J. and Doorewaard, J. A. M. C. (2006). “Individual autonomy in work teams: The role of team autonomy, self-efficacy, and social support”. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15:3, 281-299.
  9. Ocak, M. and Güler, M. (2013). „A Tipi Kişilik ve Başa Çıkma Yöntemlerinin Stresle İlişkisi: Türk ve Bosnalı Öğrenciler Arasında Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(8), 135-147.
  10. Rasmussen, T. H. and Jeppesen, H. J. (2006). „Teamwork and associated psychological factors: A review”. Work & S