KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34

TAKIM ÇALIŞMASI İLE KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ ARSASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: GÜVENLİK HİZMETLERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEAM WORK AND PERSONALITY TRAITS: AN APPLICATION IN SECURITY SERVICES

Haydar PEKDOĞAN
Sayfa
2379–2392
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to thecorrelation analysis results, there was no statistically significant relationship between team workperceiving and personality types (p> 0.05).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Individual characteristics and person-focused approaches are increasingly important in moderndomestic security services.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Survey was conducted on n = 403 gendarmeriepersonnel in charge of Tunceli Gendarmerie Command between January and May 2018 in thisframework.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to thecorrelation analysis results, there was no statistically significant relationship between team workperceiving and personality types (p> 0.05).
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Individual characteristics and person-focused approaches are increasingly important in moderndomestic security services. Besides, security services are generally a team work perceiving, and itcan be said that the propensity for team spirit indicates the success in security services at thesame time. In this research, it is aimed to examine the relationship between gendarmerie staffand team work perceiving and personality traits. Survey was conducted on n = 403 gendarmeriepersonnel in charge of Tunceli Gendarmerie Command between January and May 2018 in thisframework. According to the findings of the research, different personality traits and team workperceiving levels did not show a statistically significant difference according to the demographiccharacteristics of the personnel participating in the research (p> 0.05). According to thecorrelation analysis results, there was no statistically significant relationship between team workperceiving and personality types (p> 0.05).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PEKDOĞAN, H. (2022). TAKIM ÇALIŞMASI İLE KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ ARSASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: GÜVENLİK HİZMETLERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 34, 2379–2392. https://ajindex.com/articles/644591

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Beverborg, A. O. G., Sleegers, P. J. C. and Veen, K. (2015). “Fostering teacher learning in VET colleges: Do leadership and teamwork matter?”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48 (2015) 22-33.
  2. Bilgin, L. (1998). Örgütsel Yaşamda Olumsuz Duygular ve Bireysel Başa Çıkma Yolları. Eğitim, Sağlık ve Bilimsel Araştırma Çalışmaları Vakfı Yayınları, No: 137, Eskişehir. Blanco, A. F., Echaluce, M. L. S., Penalvo, F. J. G. and Conde, M. A. (2015). “Using Learning Analytics to improve teamwork assessment”. Computers in Human Behavior, 47(2015), 149–156.
  3. Chan, S.C.H. and Mak, W. M. (2014). “Team Identification and Interpersonal Helping Behavior in Work Teams: A Hotel Industry Study”. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 13(1), 17-33.
  4. Chen, C. A. and Rainey, H. G. (2014). “Personnel Formalization and the Enhancement Of Teamwork: A public– private comparison”. Public Management Review, 16:7, 945-968.
  5. Durna, U. (2005). A Tipi Ve B Tipi Kişilik Yapilari ve Bu Kişilik Yapilarini Etkileyen Faktörlerle İlgili Bir Araştirma”. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 275-290.
  6. Eliasa, E. I. (2014). “Increasing Values of Teamwork and Responsibility of The Students Through Games: Integrating Education Character in Lectures”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123 ( 2014 ) 196 – 203. Fernández, J. R. M., Corcelles, M. and Cerrato-Lara, M. (2011). “The Conceptions about Teamwork Questionnaire: design, reliability and validity with secondary students”. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 31:7, 857-871.
  7. Hazar, Ç. M. (2006). “Kişilik ve İletişim Tipleri”, Selçuk İletişim, 4(2), 125-140.
  8. Kankaew, V. and Wannapiroon, P. (2015). “System analysis of virtual team in cloud computing to enhance teamwork skills of undergraduate students”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174 ( 2015 ) 4096 – 4102. Mierlo, H., Rutte, C. G., Vermunt, J. K., Kompier, M. A. J. and Doorewaard, J. A. M. C. (2006). “Individual autonomy in work teams: The role of team autonomy, self-efficacy, and social support”. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15:3, 281-299.
  9. Ocak, M. and Güler, M. (2013). „A Tipi Kişilik ve Başa Çıkma Yöntemlerinin Stresle İlişkisi: Türk ve Bosnalı Öğrenciler Arasında Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma”. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(8), 135-147.
  10. Rasmussen, T. H. and Jeppesen, H. J. (2006). „Teamwork and associated psychological factors: A review”. Work & S