Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Contrast sensitivity changes after implantation of blue-light-filtering and standard hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses

Mavi ışık filtreli ve standart hidrofobik akrilik göz içi lens implantasyonu sonrası kontrast duyarlık değişimleri

Pages
112–117
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Wilcoxon test was used in statistical analysis and p0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate and compare the effects of the single piece hydrophobic acrylic int­raocular lenses (IOL's) with or without blue light filtration which are implanted after cataract extraction on contrast sensitivity function.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material.and Methods: Forty-two eyes of 21 patients operated for uncomplicated cataract extraction by phacoemulsification method and implanted with a blue-light-filtering hydrophobic acrylic IOL (Natural® Acrysof SN 60AT, Alcon) in one eyes and standard hydrophobic acrylic IOL (Acrysof® S A 30AL, Alcon) in the other eyes were studied in Ophthalmology Department of GATA Haydarpaşa Training Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Wilcoxon test was used in statistical analysis and p0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the effects of the single piece hydrophobic acrylic int­raocular lenses (IOL's) with or without blue light filtration which are implanted after cataract extraction on contrast sensitivity function. Material.and Methods: Forty-two eyes of 21 patients operated for uncomplicated cataract extraction by phacoemulsification method and implanted with a blue-light-filtering hydrophobic acrylic IOL (Natural® Acrysof SN 60AT, Alcon) in one eyes and standard hydrophobic acrylic IOL (Acrysof® S A 30AL, Alcon) in the other eyes were studied in Ophthalmology Department of GATA Haydarpaşa Training Hospital. Low and high spatial frequency contrast sensitivity scores were measured and compared by "Gradual" (Opsia®, France) contrast sensitivity scale in either eye at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Wilcoxon test was used in statistical analysis and p0.05).

Özet

Amaç: Katarakt cerrahisinde implante edilen mavi ışık filtreli ve mavi ışık filtresiz standart tek parçalı hidrofobik akrilik göz içi lens (GİL)'lerin, kontrast duyarlılık üzerine olan etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi ve karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: GATA Haydarpaşa Eğitim Hastanesi Göz Kliniğinde, fakoemülsifikas-yon cerrahisi yapılan ve bir gözlerine kapsül içine mavi ışık filtreli hidrofobik akrilik GİL (Natural® Acrysof SN 60AT, Alcon), diğer gözlerine kapsül içine standart hidrofobik akrilik GİL (Acrysof® S A 30AL, Alcon) implante edilen, komplikasyon yaşanmayan 21 hastanın 42 gözü çalışma kapsamına alındı. Postoperatif dönemde, 1. ve 3. aylarda her iki göz için ayrı ayrı düşük ve yüksek uzaysal frekanslarda kontrast duyarlılık skorları "Gradual" (Opsia®, Fransa) kontrast duyarlılık eşeli ile ölçüldü ve karşılaştırıldı. İstatistiksel analizde Wilcoxon testi kulla­nıldı ve p0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, T. F., KARADAYI, K., CERTEL, İ., AYKAN, T., BİLGE, H. A., AKIN, T. (2022). Contrast sensitivity changes after implantation of blue-light-filtering and standard hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 112–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/638624

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Kamış Ü, Okka M, Küçükçelik H: Kontrast duyarlılık ve renk görme. T Oft Gaz. 2001;31:725-737
  2. Huang FC, Tseng SH, Shih MS, Chen FK: Effect of artifi­ cial tears on corneal surface regularity, contrast sensitivity, and glare disability in dry eyes. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109: 1934-1940
  3. Altuğ M, Gözüm N, Gücükoğlu A: Streoid kataraktının kontrast duyarlılık ve kamaşma üzerine olan etkileri. T Oft Gaz. 1999;29:50-58
  4. Hayashi H, Hayashi K, Nakao F, Hayashi F: Quantitative comparison of posterior capsule opacification after poly methylmethacrylate, silicone, and soft acrylic intraocular lens implantation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1579-1582
  5. Hayashi K, Harada M, Hayashi H, Nakao F: Decentration and tilt of polymethyl methacrylate, silicone and acrylic soft intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:793-798
  6. Cristobal JA, Sierra J, Martin J, Rodriguez NA, Ascaso J: Intraocular lenses with blue light fitler. Arch Soc Esp O- talmol. 2005;80:245-250
  7. Kennis H, Huy gens M, Callebaut F: Comparing the cont­ rast sensitivity of a modified prolate anterior surface IOL and of two spherical IOLs. Bull Soc Beige Ophtalmol. 2004;294:49-58.
  8. Hess RF, Woo GO, White PD: Contrast attenuation charac­ teristics of iris clipped intraocular lens implants in situ. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69:129-135
  9. Nio YK, Jansonius NM, Geraghty E, Norrby S, Kooijman AC: Effect of intraocular lens implantation on visual acu­ ity, contrast sensitivity, and depth of focus. J Cataract Ref­ ract Surg. 2003;29:2073-2081