Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3

The early outcomes of patıents after implantatıon of acrysof ReSTOR® intraocular lens

Acrysof ReSTOR® göz içi lens implantasyonu sonrasında erken dönem sonuçlarımız

Pages
183–188
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Spectacle independence was significantly higher with this multifocal IOL, which outweighed the glare and halo symptoms it caused.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE: To evaluate the early period of patients implanted with Acrysof ReSTOR® IOL during cataract surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: In this prospective type study, 117 eyes of 60 patients implanted with Acrysof ReSTOR®IOL were involved standart phacoemülsification performed.We evaluated the refractive status, distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, contrast sensitivity after postoperative 1th month and 6th month.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Spectacle independence was significantly higher with this multifocal IOL, which outweighed the glare and halo symptoms it caused.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the early period of patients implanted with Acrysof ReSTOR® IOL during cataract surgery. METHODS: In this prospective type study, 117 eyes of 60 patients implanted with Acrysof ReSTOR®IOL were involved standart phacoemülsification performed.We evaluated the refractive status, distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, contrast sensitivity after postoperative 1th month and 6th month. RESULTS: The postoperative refractive outcomes of Acrysof Restor IOL implanted patients are as follows; 102 eyes (%82) are between +0.25 D and -0.25 D), 6 eyes (%) are between -0,25 D and -0.50 D, 5 eyes (%) are between +0.25 D and+0.50 D), 1 eye is between -0.50 and -1.00 D, 3 eyes are between +0.50 and +1.00 D.At 6 month uncorrected distance vision 108(%92) eyes 10/10, 6(%5) eyes 8/10, 2(%2) eyes 7/10, 1(%1) eye 6/10,corrected distance vision 115(%98) eyes 10/10, 1(%1) eye 8/10, 1(%1) eye 6/10.Uncorrected near vision 114(%97) eyes J2 and up, 3(%3) eyes J3-J4.Distance corrected near vision 115(%98) eyes J2 and up, 2(%2) eyes J3-J4.Uncorrected intermediate vision 86(%74) eyes J2 and up, 13(%11) eyes J3-J4, 18(%15) eyes J5.Distance corrected intermediate vision 97(%83) eyes J2 and up, 9(%8) eyes J3-J4, 11(%9) eyes J5. Contrast sensivity under the normal dispersion bent in first months altought after the thirth month it was eveluated in the normal dispersion bent. CONCLUSION: After acrysof Restor IOL implatation vision recovery rapidly but contrast sensitivity recovery after 3 month.Implantation of the ReSTOR®IOL offered excellent visual acuity at distance and near. Spectacle independence was significantly higher with this multifocal IOL, which outweighed the glare and halo symptoms it caused.

Özet

AMAÇ: Katarakt cerrahisinde implante edilen Acrysof ReSTOR® göziçi lenslerinin(GİL) erken dönem sonuçlarının değerlendirmektir. GEREÇ-YÖNTEM: Bu çalışmada fakoemülsifikasyon yapılarak, multifokal apodize difraktif göziçi lensi (Acrysof ReSTOR®) implante edilen 60 hastanın 117 gözü prospektif olarak incelendi.Hastaların postoperatif dönemde, 1.ve 6. aylarda refraksiyon sonuçları, kontrast duyarlılıkları, uzak,orta ve yakın mesafe görmeleri değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: Acrysof ReSTOR® göziçi lensi yerleştirilen hastalarda, postoperatif refraksiyon 102(%87)gözde emetropi, 1 gözde -0.50 dioptri ile -1.00 dioptri arasında, 6 gözde -0.25 dioptri ile -0.50 dioptri arasında, 5 gözde +0.25 dioptri ile +0.50 dioptri arasında, 3 gözde +0.50 dioptri ile +1.00 dioptri arasında bulunmuştur.Hastaların görmeleri değerlendirildiğinde; tashihsiz uzak görmeler 108(%92) gözde 10/10, 6(%5) gözde 8/10, 2(%2) gözde 7/10, 1(%1) gözde 6/10’du. Tashihle uzak görmeleri 115(%98) gözde 10/10, 1(%1) gözde 8/10, 1(%1) gözde 6/10’du.Yakın görmeleri tashihsiz 114(%97) gözde J2 ve yukarı, 3(%3) gözde J3-J4 idi.Tashihle (uzak tashihle) yakın görmeleri 115(%98) gözde J2 ve yukarı,2(%2) gözde J3-J4 seviyesindeydi.Orta mesafe (50-60 cm) görmeleri 86(%74) gözde J2 ve yukarı,13(%11) gözde J3-J4, 18(%15) gözde J5 seviyesindeydi.Uzak tashihli orta mesafe görmeleri 97(%83) gözde J2 ve yukarı, 9(%8) gözde J3-J4, 11(%9) gözde J5 seviyesindedir.Kontrast duyarlılıkları ilk aylarda normal dağılım eğrisinin altında olmasına rağmen 3. aydan sonra normal dağılım eğrisi içinde değerlendirilmiştir. SONUÇ: Multifokal GİL implantasyonundan sonra görme, erken dönemde kazanılırken kontrast duyarlılık 3. aydan sonra normal dağılım eğrisine uymaktadır.Acrysof ReSTOR® GİL de gözlüğe olan bağımlılığın azalması ile birlikte hastayı rahatsız etmeyen glare ve halolar oluşmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKTAY, F., ÜNSAL, U., SÖYLER, M., BİLİŞ, S., TOPALOĞLU, A. S., YILDIRIM, E. (2022). The early outcomes of patıents after implantatıon of acrysof ReSTOR® intraocular lens. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 3, 183–188. https://ajindex.com/articles/638506

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. A. Glasser and M.C. Campbell. Presbyopia and the optical changes in the human crystalline lens with age. Vision Res, 1999
  2. R. Weale. Presbyopia toward the end of the 20th century. Surv Ophthalmol 1989
  3. C. Huber. Planned myopic astigmatism as a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia, J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1981
  4. C.F. Boerner and B.H. Thrasher, Results of monovision correction in bilateral pseudophakes. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc J. 1984
  5. F. Verzella and A. Calossi, Multifocal effect of against-the-rule myopic astigmatism in pseudophakic eyes. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993
  6. P. Desai, D.C. Minassian and A. Reidy. National cataract surgery survey 1997-98
  7. a report of the results of the clinical outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999
  8. P. Desai, A. Reidy and D.C. Minassian et al. Gains from cataract surgery: visual function and quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996
  9. J. A. Retzlaff, D.R. Sanders and M.C. Kraff. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990
  10. J. M. Legeais, L. Werner and L. Werner et al., Pseudoac-commodation: BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999
  11. M. Leyland and P. Bloom, Intraocular lens design for pseudoaccommodation [letter]. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999
  12. E. Haefliger and J.M. Parel, Accommodation of an endo-capsular silicone lens (phaco-ersatz) in the aging rhesus monkey. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994
  13. Oshika, T., et al. Adhesion of lens capsule to intraocular lenses of PMMA, silicone, and acrylic foldable materials: an experimental study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998
  14. Linnola RJ, Sund M, Yinen R, Pihlajaniemi T. Adhesion of soluble fibronectin, laminin, and collagen type IV to intraocular lens materials. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999
  15. Hollick E.J., et al. Lens epithelial cell regression on the posterior capsule with different intraocular lens materials. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998
  16. Apple D. Eradication of Posterior Capsule Opacification. Ophthalmology. 2001
  17. Walkow T, Liekfeld A, Anders N, et al. A prospective evaluation of a diffractive versus a refractive designed multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 1997
  18. Weghaupt H, Pieh S, Skorpik C. Visual properties of the foldable Array multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract