Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5

Results of augmented bimedial rectus recessions in the treatment of large-angle esotropia

Geniş açılı ezotropyanın tedavisinde arttırılmış bimedial rektus geriletme sonuçları

Pages
314–317
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion: Although augmented bimedial recession technique for the correction of large-angle ET gives good results in short periods, additional surgeries may be needed after longer follow-up periods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the surgical results of augmented bimedial rectus recession in large-angle esotropia (ET).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The records of forty-nine patients (26 male, 23 female) who underwent 6 mm and more bimedial rectus recession for large-angle deviation were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion: Although augmented bimedial recession technique for the correction of large-angle ET gives good results in short periods, additional surgeries may be needed after longer follow-up periods.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the surgical results of augmented bimedial rectus recession in large-angle esotropia (ET). Material and Method: The records of forty-nine patients (26 male, 23 female) who underwent 6 mm and more bimedial rectus recession for large-angle deviation were reviewed. The mean follow-up period was 18.43±22.12 (between 3 and 84) months. The average of distance and near deviation amount was recorded in the postoperative 1st week and at the last visit as prism diopter (PD). Nineteen patients whose follow-up periods were longer than 1 year (mean: 40.74±20.94 months) were evaluated as a different group. Success and reoperation rates of both groups were assessed. Results: The mean age of the 49 patients was 7.04±8.77 (range from 1 to 67) years and the mean preoperative esodeviation amount was 49.8±11.9 (range from 35 to 85) PD. In the postoperative 1st week, the average deviation was 10.67±8.65 PD and success rate was found to be 61.1%, and in the last visit, the mean deviation angle was 9.82±9.24 PD and the success rate was 67.3%. Five of the cases (10.2%) needed reoperation. The mean age of the 19 patients with follow-up period longer than 1 year was 4.57±4.39 years (ranged between 1 and 17), and the mean preoperative esodeviation angle was 44.21±6.07 (ranged between 35 and 55) PD. In the group with longer follow-up period, the postoperative average deviation amount and success rate were 8.58±8.23 PD and 68.4% in the 1st week, and 8.05±8.02 PD and 73.7% in the last visit. Reoperation rate was found to be 21.05% (4 cases) in this group. Discussion: Although augmented bimedial recession technique for the correction of large-angle ET gives good results in short periods, additional surgeries may be needed after longer follow-up periods.

Özet

Amaç: Geniş açılı ezotropyada arttırılmış (6 mm ve üstü) bimedial rektus (BMR) geriletme cerrahisinin sonuçlarını değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2001-Mayıs 2010 tarihleri arasında geniş açılı ezotropya (ET) nedeniyle 6 mm ve üstünde BMR geriletmesi yapılmış 26’sı erkek, 23’ü kadın 49 hastanın verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastalar ortalama 18,43±22,12 (3-84)ay takip edildi. Hastaların 1 hafta sonraki ve son kontrol muayenesindeki uzak-yakın horizontal kayma miktarlarının ortalaması prizm diyoptri (PD) olarak kaydedildi ve 10 PD aralığındaki ET ve ekzotropya (XT) başarılı olarak kabul edildi. Takip süresi 12 ay ve üzerinde (ortalama 40,74±20,94 ay) olan 19 hastanın sonuçları ayrıca değerlendirildi. Her iki gruptaki reoperasyon oranları gözden geçirildi. Sonuçlar: Çalışmaya dahil edilen toplam 49 hastanın yaş ortalaması 7,04±8,77 (1-67) yıl, cerrahi öncesi ET miktarı ortalama 49,8±11,9 (35-85) PD idi. Bir hafta sonraki muayenede ortalama kayma miktarı 10,67±8,65 PD ve başarı oranı %61,1 iken, son kontrolde ortalama kayma miktarı 9,82±9,24 PD ve başarı oranı %67,3 bulundu. Toplam olguların beşinde (%10,2) takip süresi içinde reoperasyon gerekti. Bir yıl ve üzerinde takibi olan 19 hastanın yaş ortalaması 4,57±4,39 (1-17) yıl, cerrahi öncesi ortalama ET miktarı 44,21±6,07 (35-55) PD idi. Bu gruptaki cerrahi sonrası 1. hafta kontrolünde ortalama kayma miktarı 8,58±8,23 PD ve başarı oranı %68,4 iken, son kontrolde ortalama kayma miktarı 8,05±8,02 PD ve başarı oranı %73,7 bulundu. Reoperasyon oranı ise %21,05 (4 olgu) olarak saptandı. Tartışma: Geniş açılı ezotropyalarda arttırılmış bimedial rektus geriletme sonuçları genellikle kısa dönemde iyi sonuç vermekle beraber takip süresi uzadığında ilave cerrahi gerekme oranı artabilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜR, Ö., SELVİ, C., ORAL, A. Y., KARATAY, A. A. (2022). Results of augmented bimedial rectus recessions in the treatment of large-angle esotropia. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5, 314–317. https://ajindex.com/articles/638336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Greenberg AE, Mohney BG, Diehl NN, Burke JP. Incidence and Types of Childhood Esotropia: A Population-Based Study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:170-4
  2. Assaf AA. Large bimedial rectus recession (6.5 mm or more) in the management of large-angle esotropia. Strabismus. 1997;5:59-66
  3. Ing M, Costenbader FD, Parks MM, Albert DG. Early surgery for congenital esotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;61:1419-27. 4. von Noorden GK, Isaza A, Parks ME. Surgical treatment of congenital esotropia. Ophthalmology. 1972;76:1465-78
  4. Helveston EM, Ellis FD, Patterson JH, Weber J. Augmented recession of the medial recti. Ophthalmology. 1978;85:507-11
  5. Helveston EM, Ellis FD, Schott J, et al. Surgical treatment of congenital esotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:218-28
  6. Foster RS, Paul TO, Jampolsky A. Management of infantil esotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;89:291-9
  7. Lee DA, Dyer LA. Bilateral medial rectus muscle recession and lateral rectus muscle resection in the treatment of congenital esotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;95:528-35
  8. Hess JB, Calhoun JH. A new rationale for the management of large angle esotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1979;16:345-8
  9. Prieto-Diaz J. Large bilateral medial rectus recession in early esotropia with bilateral limitation of abduction. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1980;17:101-5
  10. Prieto-Diaz J. Five-year follow-up of ‘large’ (6-9 mm) bi-medial recession in the management of early-onset, infantil with Ciancia syndrome. Binocular Vision. 1985;1:209-16
  11. Szmyd SM, Nelson LB, Calhoun JH, Spratt C. Large bimedial rectus recessions in congenital esotropia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69:271-74
  12. Nelson LB, Calhoun JH, Simon JW, Wilson T, Harley RD. Surgical management of large angle congenital esotropia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987;71:380-83
  13. Weakley DR, Parks MM Results from 7 mm bilateral recessions of the medial rectus muscles for congenital esotropia. Ophthalm Surg. 1990;21:827-30
  14. Weakley DR, Stager DR, Everett ME. Seven-millimeter bilateral medial rectus recessions in infantile esotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1991;28:113-5
  15. DamanakisAG, Arvanitis PG, Ladas ID, Theodossiadis GP. 8 mm bimedial rectus recession in infantile esotropia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:842-4
  16. Altıntaş AK, Yılmaz FG, Duman S. Results of classical and augmented bimedial rectus recession in infantil esotropia. Strabismus. 1999;7:227-36
  17. Sanaç AŞ, Akıncı A. Geniş açılı infantil ezotropyada geniş bimedial rektus geriletmesi sonuçl