Glokom ve oküler hipertansiyon hastalarında humphrey matriks perimetrisi ve standart otomatik perimetrinin SITA stratejisi ile elde edilen görme alanı sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması
Comparison of visual field results of humphrey matrix perimetry and standard automated perimetry with SITA strategy in Glaucoma and ocular hypertension subjects
Material and Method: Test duration, mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), number of depressed points on pattern deviation plot (PDP) at level of p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To compare the results of Humphrey Matrix 30-2 full threshold test and standard automated perimetry (SAP) using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (30-2 SITA standard strategy).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Purpose: To compare the results of Humphrey Matrix 30-2 full threshold test and standard automated perimetry (SAP) using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (30-2 SITA standard strategy).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Material and Method: Test duration, mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), number of depressed points on pattern deviation plot (PDP) at level of p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the results of Humphrey Matrix 30-2 full threshold test and standard automated perimetry (SAP) using the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (30-2 SITA standard strategy). Material and Method: Test duration, mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), number of depressed points on pattern deviation plot (PDP) at level of p
Özet
Amaç: Humphrey Matriks 30-2 tam eflik testi sonuçlar› ile ‹sveç interaktif eflik algoritmas›n› (30-2 SITA standart stratejisi) kullananan standart otomatize perimetri (SAP) sonuçlar›n› karfl›laflt›rmak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Test süresi, ortalama deviasyon (MD), patern standart deviasyon (PSD) ile patern deviasyon haritas›nda p
🔖
Cite This Article
BOZKURT, B., TOPÇU, P. Y., İRKEÇ, M. (2022). Glokom ve oküler hipertansiyon hastalarında humphrey matriks perimetrisi ve standart otomatik perimetrinin SITA stratejisi ile elde edilen görme alanı sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2, 98–103. https://ajindex.com/articles/638330
Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Mitchell RS. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with treshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;441:741-8
Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-63
Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:357-63
Anderson RS, O'Brien C. Psychophysical evidence for a selective loss of M ganglion cells in glaucoma. Vision Res. 1997;37:1079-83
Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Gupta N, Kaufman PL, Weinreb RN. Loss of neurons in magnocellular and parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:378-84
Morgan JE, Uchida H, Caprioli J. Retinal ganglion cell death in experimental glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:303-10
Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Weinreb RN, Kaufman PL, Gupta N. Effects of retinal ganglion cell loss on magno-, parvo-, koniocellular pathways in the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22:465-81
Spry PG, Johnson CA, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA. Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:11-9
Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Mechanisms isolated by frequency doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:398-401
Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:819-29
Burnstein Y, Ellish NJ, Magbalon M, Higginbotham EJ. Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry with Humphrey visual field analysis in a glaucoma practice. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:328-33
Casson R, James B, Rubinstein A, Ali H. Clinical comparison of frequency doubling technology perimetry and Humphrey perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:360-62
Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:322-31
McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Advantages of terminating Zippy Estimation by Sequential Testing (ZEST) with dynamic criteria for white-on-white perimetry. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:981-7
Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Properties of perime