SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Visual Results Following Implantation of a Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens in One Eye and a Diffractive in the Contralateral Eye

Gül ARIKAN
Hüseyin ASLANKARA
Rukiye AYDIN
Revan Yıldırım KARABAĞ
Üzeyir GÜNENÇ
Pages
6–14
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no statistically significant difference in uncorrected near visual acuity (p>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in contrast sensitivity, reading speed, halos, or glare between the groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: To assess the visual outcomes in patients who underwent cataract surgery with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL)implantation using a “mix and match” approach.Materials and Methods: Twenty patients (40 eyes) were involved in this prospective, nonrandomized study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Refractive multifocalIOLs (ReZoom NXG1) were implanted in patients’ dominant eyes and diffractive multifocal IOLs (Tecnis ZMA00) were implanted intheir non-dominant eyes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no statistically significant difference in uncorrected near visual acuity (p>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in contrast sensitivity, reading speed, halos, or glare between the groups (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the visual outcomes in patients who underwent cataract surgery with multifocal intraocular lens (IOL)implantation using a “mix and match” approach.Materials and Methods: Twenty patients (40 eyes) were involved in this prospective, nonrandomized study. Refractive multifocalIOLs (ReZoom NXG1) were implanted in patients’ dominant eyes and diffractive multifocal IOLs (Tecnis ZMA00) were implanted intheir non-dominant eyes. Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity (logMAR), and contrastsensitivity levels were measured at 1, 3, and 6 months after cataract surgery. Defocus curves, reading speeds, patient satisfaction, spectacledependence, and halo and glare symptoms were also evaluated at 6 months after the surgery. Postoperative quality of life was assessedwith the Turkish version of National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25.Results: The study group comprised 8 females and 12 males with a mean age of 69.45±10.76 years (range, 31-86 years). Theuncorrected distance and intermediate visual acuity levels were significantly better in the ReZoom-implanted eyes at postoperative 6months (p=0.026 and p=0.037, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in uncorrected near visual acuity (p>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in contrast sensitivity, reading speed, halos, or glare between the groups (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIKAN, G., ASLANKARA, H., AYDIN, R., KARABAĞ, R. Y., GÜNENÇ, Ü. (2022). Visual Results Following Implantation of a Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens in One Eye and a Diffractive in the Contralateral Eye. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 6–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/637789

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Yamauchi T, Tabuchi H, Takase K, Ohsugi H, Ohara Z, Kiuchi Y. Comparison of visual performance of multifocal intraocular lenses with same material monofocal intraocular lenses. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68236. Aslan BS, Akyol N. Katarakt Cerrahisinde Multifokal Göziçi Lensleri ve Nöroadaptasyon. Glo-Kat. 2008;3:1-4.
  2. Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Schwenn O, Krist R, Pfeiffer N. Objective and subjective evaluation of photic phenomena after monofocal and multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1878-1886.
  3. Terwee T, Weeber H, van der Mooren M, Piers P. Visualization of the retinal image in an eye model with spherical and aspheric, diffractive, and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:223-232.
  4. Ravalico G, Baccara F, Rinaldi G. Contrast sensitivity in multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:22-25.
  5. Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Bhogal GK, Kipioti A, Shah S. Multifocal Intraocular Lens Differentiation Using Defocus Curves. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci. 2012;53:3920-3926.
  6. Chen W, Meng Q, Ye H, Liu Y. Reading ability and stereoacuity with combined implantation of refractive and diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:376-381.
  7. Yoon SY, Song IS, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Tchah H. Bilateral mix-and-match versus unilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation: Long-term comparison. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1682-1690. Knorz MC. Multifocal intraocular lenses: overview of their capabilities, limitations, and clinical benefits. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:215-217. Lubiński W, Podboraczyńska-Jodko K, Gronkowska-Serafin J, Karczewicz D. Visual outcomes three and six months after implantation of diffractive and refractive multifocal IOL combinations. Klin Oczna. 2011;113:209-215.
  8. Hütz WW, Bahner K, Röhrig B, Hengerer F. The combination of diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses to provide full visual function after cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010;20:370-375. Goes FJ. Visual results following implantation of a refractive multifocal IOL in one eye and a diffractive multifocal IOL in the contralateral eye. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:300-305.
  9. Pieh S, Marvan P, Lackner B, Hanselmayer G, Schmidinger G, Leitgeb R, Sticker M, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF, Skorpik C. Quantitative performance of bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in a model eye: point spread function in multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:23-28.
  10. Akaishi L, Vaz R,