Journals / Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2

Does Dry Eye Affect Repeatability of Corneal Topography Measurements?

Pages
57–60
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Intraclasscorrelation coefficients among all topography parameters within both groups showed excellent repeatability (>0.90).Conclusion: The anterior segment measurements provided by the Sirius corneal topography system were highly repeatable for dry eyepatients and are sufficiently reliable for clinical practice and research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives:The purpose of this study was to assess the repeatability of corneal topography measurements in dry eye patients and healthy controls.Materials and Methods: Participants underwent consecutive corneal topography measurements (Sirius; Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici,Florence, Italy).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two images with acquisition quality higher than 90% were accepted.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Intraclasscorrelation coefficients among all topography parameters within both groups showed excellent repeatability (>0.90).Conclusion: The anterior segment measurements provided by the Sirius corneal topography system were highly repeatable for dry eyepatients and are sufficiently reliable for clinical practice and research.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objectives:The purpose of this study was to assess the repeatability of corneal topography measurements in dry eye patients and healthy controls.Materials and Methods: Participants underwent consecutive corneal topography measurements (Sirius; Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici,Florence, Italy). Two images with acquisition quality higher than 90% were accepted. The following parameters were evaluated: minimumand central corneal thickness, aqueous depth, apex curvature, anterior chamber volume, horizontal anterior chamber diameter, iridocornealangle, cornea volume, and average simulated keratometry. Repeatability was assessed by calculating intra-class correlation coefficient.Results: Thirty-three patients with dry eye syndrome and 40 healthy controls were enrolled to the study. The groupswere similar in terms of age (39 [18-65] vs. 30.5 [18-65] years, p=0.198) and gender (M/F: 4/29 vs. 8/32, p=0.366). Intraclasscorrelation coefficients among all topography parameters within both groups showed excellent repeatability (>0.90).Conclusion: The anterior segment measurements provided by the Sirius corneal topography system were highly repeatable for dry eyepatients and are sufficiently reliable for clinical practice and research.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, A. Ş., KÖYLÜ, M. T., GÜRDAL, C. (2022). Does Dry Eye Affect Repeatability of Corneal Topography Measurements?. Türk Oftalmoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 2, 57–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/635913

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ortiz-Toquero S, Rodriguez G, de Juan V, Martin R. Repeatability of placidobased corneal topography in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:1467- 1473. Martin R, Jonuscheit S, Rio-Cristobal A, Doughty MJ. Repeatability of Pentacam peripheral corneal thickness measurements. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2015;38:424-429.
  2. Güler E, Yağcı R, Akyol M, Arslanyılmaz Z, Balci M, Hepşen IF. Repeatability and reproducibility of Galilei measurements in normal keratoconic and postrefractive corneas. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37:331-336.
  3. Milla M, Piñero DP, Amparo F, Alió JL. Pachymetric measurements with a new Scheimpflug photography-based system: intraobserver repeatability and agreement with optical coherence tomography pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:310-316.
  4. Dayanir V, Sakarya R, Özcura F, Kir E, Aktunç T, Özkan BS, Okyay P. Effect of corneal drying on central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:6-8.
  5. Akyol Salman I, Azizi S, Mumcu U, Öndaş O, Baykal O. Central corneal thickness in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction. Clin Exp Optom. 2011;94:464-467.
  6. Zemova E, Eppig T, Seitz B, Toropygin S, Arnold S, Langenbucher A, Gräber S, Szentmáry N. Interaction between topographic/tomographic parameters and dry eye disease in keratoconus patients. Curr Eye Res. 2014;39:1-8.
  7. Asena L, Altınörs DD, Cezairlioğlu Ş, Bölük SO. Effect of dry eye on Scheimpflug imaging of the cornea and elevation data. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017;52:313-317.
  8. Lee JH, Kim JH, Kim SW. Repeatability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement Using Rotating Scheimpflug Camera in Dry and Normal Eyes. Eye Contact Lens. 2017.
  9. McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods. 1996;1:30. Schaumberg DA, Dana R, Buring JE, Sullivan DA. Prevalence of dry eye disease among US men: estimates from the Physicians’ Health Studies. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:763-768.
  10. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1264-1268.
  11. Epitropoulos AT, Matossian C, Berdy GJ, Malhotra RP, Potvin R. Effect of tear osmolarity on repeatability of keratometry for cataract surgery planning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1672-1677. Montés-Micó R, Cáliz A, Alió JL. Changes in ocular aberrations after instillation of artificial tears in dry-eye patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1649-1652.
  12. Thibos LN, Hong X. Clinical applications of the Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:817-825.