Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2008 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

What is new in the 2007 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy

Avrupa Kardiyoloji Derneği’nin 2007 kalıcı kalp pili ve kardiyak resenkronizasyon tedavisi kılavuzu ne yenilikler getirdi?

Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZİN, B., ERTAN, Ç. (2022). What is new in the 2007 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/633504

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Vardas PE, Auricchio A, Blanc JJ, Daubert JC, Drexler H, Ector H, et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J 2007;28:2256-95
  2. Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, Freedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, et al. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices - summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/ AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1703-19
  3. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Silverman R, Leon A, Yee R, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1854-62
  4. Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, Roberts RS, Yusuf S, Gillis AM, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1385-91
  5. Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:614-23
  6. Dretzke J, Toff WD, Lip GY, Raftery J, Fry-Smith A, Taylor R. Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(2):CD003710
  7. Kerr CR, Connolly SJ, Abdollah H, Roberts RS, Gent M, Yusuf S, et al. Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing: Effects of physiological pacing during longterm follow-up. Circulation 2004;109:357-62
  8. Toff WD, Camm AJ, Skehan JD; United Kingdom Pacing and Cardiovascular Events Trial Investigators. Singlechamber versus dual-chamber pacing for high-grade atrioventricular block. N Engl J Med 2005;353:145-55
  9. Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, Greene HL, Hallstrom AP, Hsia H, et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA 2002;288:3115-23
  10. Connolly SJ, Sheldon R, Roberts RS, Gent M. The North American Vasovagal Pacemaker Study (VPS). A randomized trial of perma