SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi / 2020 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 8

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire

Seattle Anjina Anketi’nin Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirliği

Fırat ULUTATAR
Mehmet Tuncay DURUÖZ
Canan Şanal TOPRAK
Anwar SUHAİMİ
Mehmet AĞIRBAŞLI
Pages
731–738
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Divergent validity was evaluated using correlations between the SAQ and age, bodymass index (BMI), gender, and the marital status of patients.A value of p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) in patients with coronary heartdisease (CHD) and angina.Methods: The SAQ was translated from English to Turkishusing the back-translation method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It contains 19 questionsscored from 1 to either 5 or 6 in 5 domains (physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, disease perception,and treatment satisfaction).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Divergent validity was evaluated using correlations between the SAQ and age, bodymass index (BMI), gender, and the marital status of patients.A value of p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) in patients with coronary heartdisease (CHD) and angina.Methods: The SAQ was translated from English to Turkishusing the back-translation method. It contains 19 questionsscored from 1 to either 5 or 6 in 5 domains (physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, disease perception,and treatment satisfaction). Cronbach’s alpha coefficientwas used to evaluate internal consistency. Spearman’s rankcorrelation coefficient was calculated to assess the construct validity. Convergent validity was examined using correlations between the SAQ and the MacNew Heart DiseaseHealth-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (MacNew) andthe Nottingham Health Profile. Divergent validity was evaluated using correlations between the SAQ and age, bodymass index (BMI), gender, and the marital status of patients.A value of p

Özet

Amaç: Seattle Anjina Anketi’nin (SAA) Türkçe versiyonunun koroner arter hastalığı (KAH) ve anjinası olan hastalarda geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğini değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler: SAA çeviri-geri çeviri yöntemi ile İngilizce’den Türkçe’ye çevrildi. Anket 19 sorudan oluştu. Sorular 1 ile 5–6 arası puanlanmaktadır ve 5 alan değerlendirilmektedir (fiziksel limitasyon, anjinal stabilite, anjina sıklığı, hasta algısı ve hasta memnuniyeti). Güvenilirliğin değerlendirilmesi için iç tutarlılık (Cronbach alfa) değerlendirilmiştir. Yapı geçerliliğinin değerlendirilmesinde Spearman korelasyon katsayısı kullanılmıştır. Benzer ölçek geçerliliği değerlendirilmesinde SAA ile Nottingham Sağlık Profili ve MacNew kalp hastalığı yaşam kalitesi (MacNew) anketleri arasındaki ilişki değerlendirilmiştir. Ayırt edici geçerlilik değerlendirilmesinde SAA ile hastaların yaş, vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ), cinsiyet ve medeni hali arasındaki ilişkiye bakılmıştır. P

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUTATAR, F., DURUÖZ, M. T., TOPRAK, C. Ş., SUHAİMİ, A., AĞIRBAŞLI, M. (2022). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Arşivi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 8, 731–738. https://ajindex.com/articles/631934

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Balbay Y, Gagnon-Arpin I, Malhan S, Öksüz ME, Sutherland G, Dobrescu A, et al. Modeling the burden of cardiovascular disease in Turkey. Anatol J Cardiol 2018;20:235
  2. Unal B. Explaining the decline in coronary heart disease mortality in Turkey between 1995 and 2008. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1135
  3. Gandhi M, Lampe FC, Wood DA. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and short-term prognosis of angina pectoris. Br Heart J 1995;73:193–8
  4. Hemingway H, McCallum A, Shipley H, Manderbacka K, Martikainen P. Incidence and prognostic implications of stable angina pectoris among women and men. JAMA 2006;295:1404–11
  5. Parikh KS, Coles A, Schulte PJ, Kraus WE, Fleg JL, Keteyian SJ, et al. Relation of angina pectoris to outcomes, quality of life, and response to exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure (from HF-ACTION). Am J Cardiol 2016;118:1211−6
  6. Wandell PE, Brorsson B. Assessing sexual functioning in patients with chronic disorders by using a generic health-related quality of life questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2000;9:1081–92
  7. Brorsson B, Bernstein SJ, Brook RH, Werko L. Quality of life of patients with chronic stable angina before and four years after coronary revascularization compared with a normal population. Heart 2002;87:140−5
  8. Preedy VR, Watson RR. Handbook of disease burdens and quality of life measures. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2010
  9. Dempster M. Assessing quality of life in cardiac rehabilitation: Choosing an appropriate tool. British Journal of Cardiac Nursing 2011;6:335−40
  10. Alonso J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Cascant P, Brotons C, Prieto L, Soler-Soler J. Measuring functional status of chronic coronary patients. Reliability, validity and responsiveness to clinical change of the reduced version of the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). Eur Heart J 1997;18:414–9
  11. Dougherty CM, Dewhurst T, Nichol WP, Spertus J. Comparison of three quality of life instruments in stable angina pectoris: Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:569–75
  12. Lerner DJ, Amick BC 3rd, Malspeis S, Rogers WH, Gomes DR, Salem DN. The Angina-related Limitations at Work Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 1998;7:23−32
  13. Thompson DR, Yu C-M. Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease-I: Assessment tools. Health and quality of life outcomes 2003;1:42
  14. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Prodzinski J, McDonnell M, et al. Development an