Journals / Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4

Assessment of Family Environment and Needs of Families Who Have Children with Cerebral Palsy

Serebral Palsili Çocuğu olan Ailelerin Aile Ortamlarının Değerlendirilmesi ve Gereksinimlerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
320–325
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: According to the results of FNS, the most cited requirement was need for information (84.3%) and the least cited requirements were needs for babysitting while having a meeting (62.1%) and payment for childminders (74.8%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of the study is to identify family needs and to assess the family environment of children with cerebral palsy (CP).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Participants were the primary caregivers of 103 children between the age of 4 and 12 years with a diagnosis of CP.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: According to the results of FNS, the most cited requirement was need for information (84.3%) and the least cited requirements were needs for babysitting while having a meeting (62.1%) and payment for childminders (74.8%).
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to identify family needs and to assess the family environment of children with cerebral palsy (CP). Material and Methods: Participants were the primary caregivers of 103 children between the age of 4 and 12 years with a diagnosis of CP. The parents of the children completed the Family Environment Scale (FES) and the modified version of Family Needs Survey (FNS). The Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) and Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) levels of children were determined. The medical history of the participants accompanying disorders and characteristics of families are questioned. Results: According to the results of FNS, the most cited requirement was need for information (84.3%) and the least cited requirements were needs for babysitting while having a meeting (62.1%) and payment for childminders (74.8%). Neither the FES nor the FNS results was correlated to the GMFCS or MACS levels or accompanying disorders. Conclusion: Regardless of education level, parents reported need for information about their children's conditions and future services. If families are informed about their children's health condition and are aware of present or future resources, better outcomes will be seen. Understanding the needs of families who have children with CP and assessment of family characteristics and environment are important for family-centered services

Özet

Amaç: Serebral palsili (SP) çocukların ailelerinin gereksinimlerini belirlemek ve aile ortamlarını değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Katılımcılar, 4-12 yaşlarında 103 SP tanılı hastanın primer bakım verenleriydi. SP'li çocukların ailelerine Aile Ortamı Ölçeği (Family Enviroment Scale, FES)'nin modifiye edilmiş versiyonu ve Aile Gereksinimlerini Belirleme Aracı (Family Needs Survey, FNS) uygulandı. SP'li olguların Kaba Motor Fonksiyon Sınıflama Sistemi (GMFCS)'ne göre motor aktivite düzeyleri ve El Becerileri Sınıflandırma Sistemine (MACS) göre el fonksiyonları değerlendirildi. Hastaların tıbbi özgeçmişleri, eşlik eden bozukluklar ve aile karakteristikleri sorgulandı. Bulgular: Aile Gereksinimleri Ölçeği sonuçlarına göre ailelerin en fazla belirttiği gereksinim bilgi gereksinimi (%84,3), en az belirttiği gereksinim toplantıya katılmaları gerektiği zaman çocuklarını bırakılabilecekleri yuva gereksinimi (%62,1) ve bakıcı ücreti için para ihtiyacı (%74,8) olarak tespit edilmiştir. FES ve FNS sonuçları ile eşlik eden sorunların varlığı, GMFCS ve MACS evreleri arasında ilişki saptanmamıştır. Sonuç: Eğitim seviyeleri ne olursa olsun ailelerin çocuklarının durumu ve gelecekteki bakımlarıyla ilgili bilgiye ihtiyaçları olduğu saptandı. Eğer aileler çocuklarının sağlık durumu ve mevcut ve gelecekteki bakımları için kaynaklar hakkında bilgilendirilirse tedavi sonuçlarının daha iyi olduğu görülecektir. SP'li çocuğu olan ailelerin, aile gereksinimlerini anlamak ve aile karakteristiklerini ve ortamlarını değerlendirmek aile odaklı bakım için önemlidir

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, R., SAYGI, E. K., ULUTATAR, F., CERŞİT, H. P., GİRAY, E. (2022). Assessment of Family Environment and Needs of Families Who Have Children with Cerebral Palsy. Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 4, 320–325. https://ajindex.com/articles/628690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Oskoui M, Coutinho F, Dykeman J, Jetté N, Pringsheim T. An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol 2013;55:509-19. [CrossRef] Robertson CM, Svenson LW, Joffres MR. Prevalence of cerebral palsy in Alberta. Can J Neurol Sci 1998;25:117-22. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/cp/data.html.
  2. Shumway-Cook A, Hutchinson S, Kartin D, Price R, Woollacott M. Effect of balance training on recovery of stability in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;45:591-602. [CrossRef] Russman B. Cerebral palsy: definition, manifestations and etiology. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2002;48:4-6.
  3. Öneş K, Çelik B, Çağlar N, Gültekin Ö, Yılmaz E, Çetinkaya B, et al. Serebral palsi polikliniğine müracaat eden hastaların demografik ve klinik özellikleri. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2008;54:13-6.
  4. Raina P, O'Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Brehaut J, Walter SD, Russell D, et al. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cere- bral palsy. Pediatrics 2005;115:e626-36. [CrossRef] Aydın R, Nur H. Serebral Palsili Çocukların Tedavisinde Aile Odaklı Yaklaşım. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2012;58:229-35. [CrossRef] Palisano R, Almarsi N, Chiarello L, Orlin M, Bagley A, Maggs J. Fam- ily needs of parents of children and youth with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 2010;36:85-92. [CrossRef] Almasri N, Palisano R, Dunst C, Chiarello LA, O'Neil M, Polansky M. Profiles of family needs of children and youth with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 2012;38:798-806. [CrossRef] Alshryda S, Wright J. Development and Reliability of a System to Classify Gross Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy. In: Banaszkiewicz PA, Kader DF, editors. Classic Papers in Orthopaedics. Springer; 2014. p.575-7. [CrossRef] Akpinar P, Tezel CG, Eliasson AC, Icagasioglu A. Reliability and cross-cultur- al validation of the Turkish version of Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:1910-6. [CrossRef] Usluer S. The reliability and validity of the Turkish family environment questionnaire (dissertation). İstanbul, Turkey: Bosphorus University 1989. Sucuoğlu B. Özürlü çocuğu olan anne-babaların gereksinimlerinin belirlenmesi. Turk J Child Adolesc Ment Health 1995;2:10-8. Shubhra MG-SD. Cerebral Palsy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2007.
  5. Hagberg B, Hagberg G, Beckung E, Uvebrant P. Changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. VIII. Prevalence and origin in the birth year period 1991-9