Journals / Türkiye Diyabet ve Obezite Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Type 2 Diabetes Changes the Response Dynamics in the Decision Making Mechanism

Tip 2 Diyabet Karar Mekanizmasında Tepki Dinamiğini Değiştirir

Pages
113–120
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: These results showed that the T2DM group lower performance on cognitive functioning compared the control group, considered behavioral and electrophysiological findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Due to changing life style and nutritional habits, diabetes mellitus one of the most important chronic diseases with an increasing incidence in the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we aimed to investigate the cognitive effects via auditory stimuli in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: These results showed that the T2DM group lower performance on cognitive functioning compared the control group, considered behavioral and electrophysiological findings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Diyabetes mellitus · Simon görevi · Dikkat

Abstract

Aim: Due to changing life style and nutritional habits, diabetes mellitus one of the most important chronic diseases with an increasing incidence in the world. Besides cerebrovascular affects, there are also studies that diabetes affects cognitive functions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the cognitive effects via auditory stimuli in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Material and Methods: This study was carried out a total of 58 elderly individuals, diagnosed T2DM and a control group of similar ages. The Simon paradigm was applied simultaneously while recording electroencephalography (EEG) and electrooculography after determined fasting blood glucose levels from the participants included in the study. Event-related potentials (ERP) were derived from the EEG recordings. Independent samples t-test was used to compare between the control and T2DM group variables. Results: There was an increase in the responses to the incongruent stimuli according to all parameters compared to the congruent stimulus, which was accepted as the orientation effect. The reaction time of the T2DM group increased compared to the control group in all test conditions. In the T2DM group, the amplitudes of ERP N1, P2 and P3 were decreased single and in peak-to-peak measurements under all experimental conditions. P3 latency increased in the T2DM group compared to the control group. Conclusion: These results showed that the T2DM group lower performance on cognitive functioning compared the control group, considered behavioral and electrophysiological findings. These decreases indicate brainstem and white matter are affected from T2DM. In addition, the change in ERP deflections showed that it affects response selection in the decision making mechanism

Özet

Amaç: Değişen yaşam ve beslenme alışkanlıkları sebebiyle diabetes mellitus dünyada her geçen gün insidansı artan önemli kronik hastalıklardandır. Diyabetin serebrovasküler etkilerinin yanı sıra kognitif fonksiyonlar üzerine etkisinin olduğunu bildiren çalışmalar bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada tip 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) hastalarında işitsel uyaranlar eşliğinde kognitif etkileri denetlemeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışma T2DM teşhisi almış ileri yaş bireyler ile benzer yaşlarda kontrol grubundan oluşan toplam 58 katılımcı ile gerçekleştirildi. Çalışmaya dahil olan bireylerden açlık kan şekeri ölçümünün ardından elektroensefalografi (EEG) ve elektrookülografi kaydı alınırken eş zamanlı olarak Simon paradigması uygulandı. Alınan EEG kayıtlarından olayla ilişkili potansiyeller (OİP) elde edildi. Kontrol ve T2DM grupları arasındaki değişkenleri karşılaştırmak için bağımsız örneklem t testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Uyumsuz sunulan uyaran cevapları, uyumlu uyaran cevaplarına göre ölçülen tüm parametrelerde arttı. Bu artış yönelim etkisi olarak kabul edildi. Tüm test koşullarında kontrol grubuna göre T2DM grubu reaksiyon süresi arttı. T2DM grubunda OİP; N1, P2, P3 genlikleri tekil olarak ve tepeden tepeye ölçümlerinde tüm deney koşullarında azaldı. Kontrol grubuna göre T2DM grubunda P3 latansı artış gösterdi. Sonuç: Davranış ve elektrofizyolojik bulgularda T2DM hasta grubu bilişsel fonksiyon bakımından kontrol grubuna göre düşük performans göstermiştir. Bu azalış beyin sapı ve beyaz cevherin T2DM’den etkilendiğine işaret etti. Bununla birlikte OİP defleksiyonlarındaki değişim karar mekanizmasında tepki rekabetini etkilediğini gösterdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALKANAT, M., ALKANAT, H. Ö. (2022). Type 2 Diabetes Changes the Response Dynamics in the Decision Making Mechanism. Türkiye Diyabet ve Obezite Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 113–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/627840

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Mallorquí-Bagué N, Lozano-Madrid M, Toledo E, Corella D, Salas-Salvadó J, Cuenca-Royo A, et al. Type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment in an older population with overweight or obesity and metabolic syndrome: baseline cross-sectional analysis of the PREDIMED-plus study. Scientific Reports. 2018 2018/10/31;8(1):16128. Allen KV, Frier BM, Strachan MW. The relationship between type 2 diabetes and cognitive dysfunction: longitudinal studies and their methodological limitations. European journal of pharmacology. 2004 Apr 19;490(1-3):169-75. Kloppenborg RP, van den Berg E, Kappelle LJ, Biessels GJ. Diabetes and other vascular risk factors for dementia: which factor matters most? A systematic review. European journal of pharmacology. 2008 May 6;585(1):97-108.
  2. Monette MC, Baird A, Jackson DL. A meta-analysis of cognitive functioning in nondemented adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Canadian journal of diabetes. 2014 Dec;38(6):401-8.
  3. Brismar T, Maurex L, Cooray G, Juntti-Berggren L, Lindström P, Ekberg K, et al. Predictors of cognitive impairment in type 1 diabetes. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Sep-Nov;32(8-10):1041-51.
  4. Ryan CM, Williams TM, Orchard TJ, Finegold DN. Psychomotor slowing is associated with distal symmetrical polyneuropathy in adults with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 1992 Jan;41(1):107-13.
  5. Palta P, Schneider AL, Biessels GJ, Touradji P, Hill-Briggs F. Magnitude of cognitive dysfunction in adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of six cognitive domains and the most frequently reported neuropsychological tests within domains. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS. 2014 Mar;20(3):278-91. de la Monte SM. Insulin resistance and Alzheimer's disease. BMB Rep. 2009;42(8):475-81.
  6. Akter K, Lanza EA, Martin SA, Myronyuk N, Rua M, Raffa RB. Diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease: shared pathology and treatment? British journal of clinical pharmacology. 2011 Mar;71(3):365-76.
  7. Cooray GK, Maurex L, Brismar T. Cognitive impairment correlates to low auditory event-related potential amplitudes in type 1 diabetes. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008 Aug;33(7):942-50. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113. Simon JR. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of experimental psychology. 1969 Jul;81(1):174-6.
  8. Cespon J, Hommel B, Korsch M, Galashan D. The neurocognitive underpinnings of the Simon effect: An integrative review of current research. Co