Journals / Türkiye Diyabet ve Obezite Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

The Relationship Between Weight Self-Stigma and Gender Role Attitudes in Patients Presenting for Bariatric Surgery

Bariatrik Cerrahi İçin Başvuran Hastalarda Kilo Öz-Damgalaması ile Toplumsal Cinsiyet Rolü Tutumları Arasındaki İlişki

Pages
187–196
Publication Date
2026-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A statistically significant positive association was observed between female gender and total weight self-stigma scores (r = .348, p < .05).Conclusion: The findings indicate a significant association between gender role attitudes and weight self-stigma among patients seeking bariatric surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This cross-sectional study was designed to examine the association between weight self-stigma and attitudes toward gender roles among individuals seeking bariatric surgery.Material and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive approach was adopted in this study, which involved 111 patients evaluated for bariatric surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Of the participants, 64.9% were women, while 44.1% were between 31 and 50 years of age.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A statistically significant positive association was observed between female gender and total weight self-stigma scores (r = .348, p < .05).Conclusion: The findings indicate a significant association between gender role attitudes and weight self-stigma among patients seeking bariatric surgery.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bariatrik cerrahi · Toplumsal cinsiyet · Öz-damgalama

Abstract

Aim: This cross-sectional study was designed to examine the association between weight self-stigma and attitudes toward gender roles among individuals seeking bariatric surgery.Material and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive approach was adopted in this study, which involved 111 patients evaluated for bariatric surgery. Information was collected using a form covering sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, together with the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) and the Gender Roles Attitude Scale (GRAS). The collected data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency, mean and standard deviation for descriptive purposes, Pearson’s correlation analysis to assess associations between variables, and hierarchical multiple linear regression to examine the contribution of the study variables to the outcome. Results: Of the participants, 64.9% were women, while 44.1% were between 31 and 50 years of age. Class III obesity was identified in 68.5% of the participants, and 76.6% reported experiencing weight-related problems for more than eight years. In addition, 30.6% indicated that dissatisfaction with their body image when looking in the mirror was a reason for deciding to undergo bariatric surgery. A statistically significant positive association was observed between female gender and total weight self-stigma scores (r = .348, p < .05).Conclusion: The findings indicate a significant association between gender role attitudes and weight self-stigma among patients seeking bariatric surgery. These findings highlight the importance of considering gender-related perceptions when evaluating weight-related self-stigma in this population.

Özet

Amaç: Bu tanımlayıcı ve kesitsel çalışma, bariatrik cerrahi için başvuran hastalarda kilo öz-damgalaması ile toplumsal cinsiyet rolü tutumları arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemeyi amaçlamıştır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bariatrik cerrahi için başvuran 111 hasta arasında tanımlayıcı kesitsel bir çalışma yürütüldü. Veriler, tanımlayıcı bir bilgi formu, Kilo Öz-Damgalama Anketi ve Cinsiyet Rolleri Tutum Ölçeği kullanılarak toplandı. Verilerin değerlendirilmesinde Kolmogorov-Smirnov testi, Cronbach alfa güvenilirlik analizi, aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma ve Pearson korelasyon analizi kullanıldı.Bulgular: Katılımcıların %64,9’unun kadın olduğu ve %44,1’inin 31–50 yaş aralığında bulunduğu saptanmıştır. Hastaların %68,5’inin sınıf 3 obeziteye sahip olduğu ve %76,6’sının sekiz yıldan uzun süredir kilo problemi yaşadığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca katılımcıların %30,6’sının aynadaki beden yansımalarından memnun olmadıkları için ameliyat olmaya karar verdikleri bulunmuştur. Toplam kilo özdamgalama ölçeği puanı ile kadın cinsiyet arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı ilişki bulunmuştur (r=.348; p <0,05).Sonuç: Toplumsal cinsiyet rolleri tutumları ile kilo öz-damgalaması arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çetin, N. Ş., Çalışkan, E., Ersöğütçü, F., Kargın, M., Çankaya, A. (2026). The Relationship Between Weight Self-Stigma and Gender Role Attitudes in Patients Presenting for Bariatric Surgery. Türkiye Diyabet ve Obezite Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 187–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/1436189

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. World Health Organization. 2022 [Available from: https:// w w w. w h o. i n t / n e w s - r o o m / f a c t - s h e e t s / d e t a i l / o b e s i - ty-and-overweight
  2. Yılmaz FT, Kumsar AK, Olgun N. Obez Bireylerde Stigma. Diyabet, Obezite ve Hipertansiyonda Hemşirelik Forumu Dergisi. 2013;5:28-33.
  3. Farnsworth HR, Leget DL, LaCaille LJ, LaCaille RA, Koball AM, Niemann A, et al. Experienced Weight Stigma Changes Following Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta‐ Analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2026:e70179.
  4. Balkoca F, Cubukcu M, Yurt NŞ. The relationship between obesity with depression and anxiety levels: A cross-sectional, case-control study. Turk J Diab Obes. 2023;7(2):152-158.
  5. Burucu R, Durmaz M. A Qualitative Study on Individuals with Obesity: What do They Experience? How do They Feel? What are Their Expectations? Turk J Diab Obes. 2024;8(3):256-264.
  6. Bozdemir H, Yaban ZŞ, Güler SA, Utkan Z. Learning Needs of Bariatric Surgery Patients: A Qualitative Study. Turk J Diab Obes. 2022;6(3):215-223.
  7. Jung FU, Luck-Sikorski C. Overweight and lonely? A representative study on loneliness in obese people and its determinants. Obesity Facts. 2019;12(4):440-447.
  8. Oliveira DMd, Merighi MAB, Jesus MCPd. The decision of an obese woman to have bariatric surgery: the social phenomenology. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2014;48(6):970-976.
  9. Bellikçi Koyu E, Karaağaç Y, Mıçooğulları Ş. Sağlık bilimleri öğrencilerinde obezite ön yargısı ve ilişkili etmenler. Turk J Diab Obes. 2020;3:260-269.
  10. Sattler KM, Deane FP, Tapsell L, Kelly PJ. Gender differences in the relationship of weight-based stigmatisation with motivation to exercise and physical activity in overweight individuals. Health Psychology Open. 2018;5(1):2055102918759691.
  11. Sezgin D. Health and medicalization in gender perspective. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2015;18(1):153-186.
  12. Ergin AB. Evaluation of obesity in perspective of women health and gender roles. Journal of Women’s Health Nursing. 2014;1(1):41-54.
  13. Hansson LM, Näslund E, Rasmussen F. Perceived discrimination among men and women with normal weight and obesity. A population-based study from Sweden. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38(6):587-96.
  14. Spahlholz J, Baer N, König HH, Riedel‐Heller SG, Luck‐ Sikorski C. Obesity and discrimination–a systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. Obesity Reviews. 2016;17(1):43-55.
  15. Steyer NH, Oliveira MC, Gouvêa MRF, Echer IC, Lucena AdF. Clinical profile, nursing diagnoses and nursing care for postoperative bariatric surgery patients. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem. 2016;37:e5017.
  16. Özdemir İlhan B. Obezite cerrahisinin benlik saygısı ve yaşam kalitesine etkisi [Master’s thesis]: Maltepe University; 2018.
  17. Ateş D. Obezite cerrahisi uygulanan hastalara özgü Moorehead Ardelt yaşam kalitesi ölçeği II’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması geçerlik ve güvenilirliği [Master’s Thesis]. Antalya: Akdeniz University; 2018.
  18. Demiral V. Obez bireylerde kiloyla ilişkili kendini damgalamanın erken dönem uyumsuz şemalarla ilişkinin incelenmesi [Master’s thesis]: İstanbul Gelişim University 2020.
  19. Lillis J, Luoma JB, Levin ME, Hayes SC. Measuring weight self‐stigma: the weight self‐stigma questionnaire. Obesity. 2010;18(5):971-6.
  20. Zeyneloğlu S, Terzioğlu F. Development and psychometric properties gender roles attitude scale. H U Journal of Education. 2011;40(40):409-20.
  21. Hill B, Bergmeier H, Incollingo Rodriguez AC, Barlow FK, Chung A, Ramachandran D, et al. Weight stigma and obesity‐related policies: a systematic review of the state of the literature. Obesity Reviews. 2021;22(11):e13333.
  22. Lazarus JV, Kakalou C, Palayew A, Karamanidou C, Maramis C, Natsiavas P, et al. A Twitter discourse analysis of negative feelings and stigma related to NAFLD, NASH and obesity. Liver International. 2021;41(10):2295-307.
  23. Muratdağı G, Karadeniz F. Obez bireylerin damgalanması ve sonuçları. Sakarya Medical Journal. 2022;12(1):188-92.
  24. Hübner C, Schmidt R, Selle J, Köhler H, Müller A, de Zwaan M, et al. Comparing self-report measures of internalized weight stigma: the weight self-stigma questionnaire versus the weight bias internalization scale. PloS One. 2016;11(10):e0165566.
  25. Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD. Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. International Journal of Obesity. 2008;32(6):992-1000.
  26. Major B, Tomiyama J, Hunger JM. The negative and bidirectional effects of weight stigma on health. In: B. Major, J. F. Dovidio, Link BG, editors. The Oxford handbook of stigma, discrimination, and health. Oxford University Press: Oxford University Press.; 2017. p. 499–519.
  27. Griffiths C, Williamson H, Zucchelli F, Paraskeva N, Moss T. A systematic review of the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for body image dissatisfaction and weight self-stigma in adults. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. 2018;48:189-204.
  28. Emmer C, Bosnjak M, Mata J. The association between weight stigma and mental health: A meta‐analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2020;21(1):e12935.
  29. Westbury S, Oyebode O, Van Rens T, Barber TM. Obesity stigma: causes, consequences, and potential solutions. Current Obesity Reports. 2023;12(1):10-23.
  30. Romano E, Ramos Salas X, Alonso Diez L, Camperchioli I, Gerardi C, Moize V, et al. Impact of Weight Bias, Stigma and Discrimination on Physical, Mental, and Quality of Life Outcomes of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review. Obesity Surgery. 2026:1-12.
  31. Erdoğan G, Akın A. Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitliği Bağlamında Kadın Bedenine Yapılan Tıbbi Müdahaleler. Sağlık ve Toplum. 2021;31(2):14-20.
  32. Ünlü DG. Dijital ebeveynlik ve mobil uygulamalar: Dijital ebeveynlerin mobil uygulama kullanım pratiklerinin incelenmesi. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi. 2020;2020(50):5673.
  33. Akdogan N, Doğan DU. An analysis of the sustainability reports of businesses in Turkey in 2020 and 2021, regarding the achievement of sustainable development goal no 5: gender equality, and evaluation of the results. The World of Accounting Science 2023;25:219-40
  34. Papadopoulos S, Brennan L. Correlates of weight stigma in adults with overweight and obesity: A systematic literature review. Obesity. 2015;23(9):1743-60.
  35. Dimitrov Ulian M, Fernandez Unsain R, Rocha Franco R, Aurélio Santo M, Brewis A, Trainer S, et al. Weight stigma after bariatric surgery: A qualitative study with Brazilian women. PloS One. 2023;18(7):e0287822.
  36. Ryan L, Coyne R, Heary C, Birney S, Crotty M, Dunne R, et al. Weight stigma experienced by patients with obesity in healthcare settings: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Obesity Reviews. 2023;24(10):e13606
  37. World Health Organization. 2022 [Available from: https:// w w w. w h o. i n t / n e w s - r o o m / f a c t - s h e e t s / d e t a i l / o b e s i - ty-and-overweight