SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon / 2013 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Time-distance parameters and plantar pressure distribution of gait during pregnancy period

Gebelik sürecinde zaman mesafe parametreleri ve plantar basınç dağılımı

Özge TOSUN ÇELİKER
Salih ANGIN
İlkşan DEMİRBÜKEN
Seher ÖZYÜREK
Recep Emre OKYAY
Pages
71–79
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a significant difference in maximum force of plantar pressureparameters between the 1st-2nd and 3rd trimesters during walking (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the time-distance gait parameters and thedynamic plantar pressure distribution during pregnancy period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Thirty eight pregnantwomen with a mean age 30.07±6.14 years (1st trimester: N=7, 2nd trimester: N=12, and 3rd trimester: N=19) participated in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a significant difference in maximum force of plantar pressureparameters between the 1st-2nd and 3rd trimesters during walking (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the time-distance gait parameters and thedynamic plantar pressure distribution during pregnancy period. Methods: Thirty eight pregnantwomen with a mean age 30.07±6.14 years (1st trimester: N=7, 2nd trimester: N=12, and 3rd trimester: N=19) participated in this study. The gait analysis was assessed using 3D movementanalyses system and dynamic plantar pressure distribution during walking was measured usingelectronic pedobarograph system. Results: Thirty-two subjects plantar pressuremeasurements and 22 subjects gait analyses were assessed among a total of 38 participants.There was no significant difference in time-distance gait parameters between the 1st-2nd and 3rd trimesters (p>0.05). There was a significant difference in maximum force of plantar pressureparameters between the 1st-2nd and 3rd trimesters during walking (p

Özet

Amaç: Gebelik sürecinde yürümenin zaman-mesafe parametrelerini ve yürümedeki dinamikplantar basınç dağılımını incelemekti. Yöntem: Çalışmaya, yaş ortalaması 30.07±6.14 olan 38gebe kadın (1. trimester: N=7, 2. trimester: N=12 ve 3. trimester: N=19) katıldı. Katılımcılarınyürüme analizi üç boyutlu hareket analiz sistemi, yürüme sırasındaki dinamik plantar basınçdağılımları ise elektronik pedobarografi cihazı ile değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Çalışmaya katılan 38gebeden 32sinin plantar basınç ölçümleri, 22sinin yürüme analizi yapıldı. 1.-2.-3. trimesterlerarasında yürümenin zaman-mesafe parametreleri açısından anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p>0.05).Yürüme sırasındaki plantar basınç parametreleri karşılaştırıldığında maksimum kuvvette 1.-2.-3.trimester arasında anlamlı fark bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİKER, Ö. T., ANGIN, S., DEMİRBÜKEN, İ., ÖZYÜREK, S., OKYAY, R. E. (2022). Time-distance parameters and plantar pressure distribution of gait during pregnancy period. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 71–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/623432

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Foti T, Davids J, Bagley A. A biomechanical analysis of gait during pregnancy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:625-632
  2. Sade A, Algun C, Otman S. M. Rektus abdominis, m. oblikus internus, eksternus ve sırt ekstansörlerinin kas testi ile değerlendirilerek, doğum yapmış ve yapmamış kadınlarda, çeşitli yaş gruplarında karşılaştırılması. Fizyoter Rehabil. 1984;4:481-489
  3. Kara F, Akarcalı İ, Akbayrak T, et al. Gebelikte diastatis recti abdominis insidansı. Fizyoter Rehabil. 1996;8:24-29
  4. Fries E, Hellebrandt F. The influence of pregnancy on the location of the center of gravity, postural stability, and body alignment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1943;46:374-380
  5. Marnach M, Ramin K, Ramsey P, et al. Characterization of the relationship between joint laxity and maternal hormones in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:331-335
  6. Stephenson R, O’Connor L. Obstetric and gynecologic care in physical therapy. Second edition. 2000; Slack Inc, New Jersey, USA 7. Oliveira LF, Vieira TMM, Macedo AR, et al. Postural sway changes during pregnancy: a descriptive study using stabilometry. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;147:25-28
  7. Jang J, Hsiao K T, Hsiao-Wecksler E. Balance (perceived and actual) and preferred stance width during pregnancy. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23:468-476
  8. McCrory JL, Chambers AJ, Daftary A, et al. Dynamic postural stability during advancing pregnancy. J Biomech. 2010;26;43:2434-2439
  9. Franklin M, Conner-Kerr T. An analysis of posture and back pain in the first and third trimesters of pregnancy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.1998;28:133- 138
  10. Nyska M, Sofer D, Porat A, et al. Plantar foot pressures in pregnant women. Isr J Med Sci. 1997;33:139-146
  11. Lymbery JK, Gilleard W. The stance phase of walking during late pregnancy: temporospatial and ground reaction force variables. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:247-253
  12. Albino MA, Moccellin AS, Firmento Bda S, et al. Gait force propulsion modifications during pregnancy: effects of changes in feet's dimensions. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2011;33:164-169
  13. McCrory JL, Chambers AJ, Daftary A, et al. Ground reaction forces during gait in pregnant fallers and non-fallers. Gait Posture. 2011;34:524-528
  14. Wu W, Meijer OG, Lamoth CJ, et al. Gait coordination in pregnancy: transverse pelvic and thoracic rotations and their relative phase. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004;19:480-488
  15. Bird AR, Menz HB, Hyde CC. The effect of pregnancy on footprint parameters. A prospecti