Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 5

Effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on haemodynamics, and recovery profile in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoskopik kolesistektomilerde remifentanil ve alfentanilin hemodinami ve derlenme üzerine etkileri

Pages
349–355
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Mean recovery times according to Modified Aldrete Score at the 10. and 15. minutes were significantly shorter in the remifentanil group.In conclusion, remifentanil provides better haemodynamic stability with fewer indications of light anesthesia, and less additional intraoperative opioid than alfentanil.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Sixty-two patients were included to the study after approval by local ethic committee.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Following induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2 mg kg-1 and cis-atracurium 0.15 mg kg-1, patients were randomly allocated into two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Mean recovery times according to Modified Aldrete Score at the 10. and 15. minutes were significantly shorter in the remifentanil group.In conclusion, remifentanil provides better haemodynamic stability with fewer indications of light anesthesia, and less additional intraoperative opioid than alfentanil.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Sixty-two patients were included to the study after approval by local ethic committee. Following induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2 mg kg-1 and cis-atracurium 0.15 mg kg-1, patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In the remifentanil group, a 1 µg kg-1 bolus was given followed by infusion of 1 µg kg-1 dk-1 until incision and 0.5 µg kg-1 dk-1 thereafter. In alfentanil group, an 8 µg kg-1 bolus was given followed by infusions of 2 µg k-1 dk-1 until incision and 1 µg kg-1 dk-1 thereafter.Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), SpO2, recovery time, first postoperative analgesic requirement and complications were recorded.MAP significantly decreased in both groups compared to baseline values. HR values during the operative period were significantly lower in the remifentanil group. The times to awakening, tracheal extubation and the first analgesic requirement were similar in both groups. Mean recovery times according to Modified Aldrete Score at the 10. and 15. minutes were significantly shorter in the remifentanil group.In conclusion, remifentanil provides better haemodynamic stability with fewer indications of light anesthesia, and less additional intraoperative opioid than alfentanil. However, in patients receiving remifentanil, postoperative analgesia should be initiated before remifentanil's discontinuation.

Özet

Etik kurul onayı alınan 62 hasta, 2 mg kg-1 propofol ve 0.15 mg kg-1 sis-atrakuryum ile anestezi indüksiyonundan sonra rasgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Remifentanil grubuna, remifentanil 1 µg kg-1 bolus, insizyona kadar 1 µg kg-1 dk-1, daha sonra 0.5 µg kg-1 dk-1; alfentanil grubuna, alfentanil 8 µg kg-1 bolus, insizyona kadar 2 µg kg-1 dk-1, daha sonra 1 µg kg-1 dk-1 hızında verildi. Olguların ortalama arter basıncı (OAB,) kalp atım hızı (KAH), SpO2 değerleri, derlenme süreleri, postoperatif ilk analjezik uygulama zamanı ve komplikasyonlar kaydedildi.OAB değerleri açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı fark olmadığı, KAH değerlerinde ise, intraoperatif dönemde remifentanil grubunda alfentanil grubuna göre anlamlı azalma olduğu görüldü. Uyanma, ekstübasyon ve postoperatif ilk analjezik gereksinim zamanı ile komplikasyonlar açısından gruplar arasında fark bulunmadı. Modifiye Aldrete skoruna göre ortalama derlenme süreleri 10. ve 15. dakikalarda remifentanil grubunda daha yüksekti.Sonuç olarak, laparoskopik kolesistektomilerde remifentanilin alfentanile göre daha stabil bir hemodinami sağladığını, yüzeyel anesteziyi tedavi etmek amacıyla daha az intraoperatif opioid doz ayarlaması gerektirdiğini, ancak remifentanil kullanılan olgularda postoperatif analjezinin remifentanil infüzyonu sonlandırılmadan önce planlanması gerektiğini düşünmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, N., EMER, İ., KARAKAYA, H., SANLI, S., YEĞİN, A. (2022). Effects of remifentanil and alfentanil on haemodynamics, and recovery profile in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 5, 349–355. https://ajindex.com/articles/620197

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Visser K, Hassink EA, Bonsel GJ, Moen J, Kalkman CJ. Randomized controlled trial of total intravenous anesthesia with propofol versus inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane-nitrous oxide: postoperative nausea with vomiting and economic analysis. Anesthesiology 2001
  2. Raftery S, Sherry E. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and alfentanil protects against postoperative nausea and vomiting. Can J Anaesth 1992
  3. Suttner S, Boldt J, Schmidt C, Piper S, Kümle B. Cost analysis of target-controlled infusion-based anesthe sia compared with standart anesthesia regimens. Anesth Analg 1999
  4. Kapila A, Glass PS, Jacobs JR, et al. Measured con text-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil Anesthesiology 1995
  5. Michelsen LG, Hug Jr CC. The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil. J Clin Anesth 1996
  6. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D. A postanesthetic recovery sco re. Anesth Analg 1970
  7. Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, et al. Bispectral analy sis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunte ers. Anesthesiology 1997
  8. Vuyk J. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic inte ractions between opioids and propofol. J Clin Anesth 1997
  9. Vuyk J, Engbers FH, Burin AG, et al. Pharmacody namic interaction between propofol and alfentanil when given for induction of anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1996
  10. Kapila A, Glass PS, Jacobs JR, et al. Measured con text-sensitive half-times of remifentanil and alfentanil. Anesthesiology 1995
  11. Cartwright DP, Kvalsvik O, Cassuto J, et al. A ran domized blind comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil during anesthesia for outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 1997
  12. Güneş Y, Özbek H, Özalevli M, Tarhan Ö, Akman H. Azot protoksitle birlikte uygulanan propofol-alfentanil ve propofol-remifentanilin hemodinami, derlenme ve kog nitif fonksiyonlar üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırması. Türk Anest Rean Cem Mecmuası 2001
  13. Schuttler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H, et al. A compari son of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anesthesia 1997
  14. Philip BK, Scuderi PE, Chung F, et al. Remifentanil compared with alfentanil for ambulatory surgery using to tal intravenous anesthesia. The Remifentanil/Alfentanil Outpatient TIVA Group. Anesth Analg 1997
  15. O'Hare R, McAtamney D, Mirakhur RK, Hughes