Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

The effectiveness of reliefband and metoclopramide on morphine related nausea-vomiting in intravenous patient controlled analgesia

İntravenöz hasta kontrollü analjezide morfine bağlı bulantı ve kusmada "Reliefband" ve metoklopramidin etkinliği

Pages
180–186
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In group RB and group M, the amount of antiemetic drug consumption was less than that of group C at the 2nd, 6th and 24th hours (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of our study to compare the effect of Reliefband applied to the P6 acupuncture point, with metoclopramide on nausea-vomiting related to the postoperative morphine use by patient controlled analgesia in major orthopedic surgery. 42 patients between the ages of 18-70, were randomly allocated into 3 groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:İn group Reliefband (GroupRB), active RB (25mA, 4Hz) to the P6 acupuncture point of the right forearm and 2 cc iv saline 3 times daily; in group metoclopramide (Group M) inactive RB and iv l0 mg metoclopramide 3 times daily; in group control (Group C), inactive RB and 2 cc iv saline was given 15 minutes before induction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In group RB and group M, the amount of antiemetic drug consumption was less than that of group C at the 2nd, 6th and 24th hours (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of our study to compare the effect of Reliefband applied to the P6 acupuncture point, with metoclopramide on nausea-vomiting related to the postoperative morphine use by patient controlled analgesia in major orthopedic surgery. 42 patients between the ages of 18-70, were randomly allocated into 3 groups. İn group Reliefband (GroupRB), active RB (25mA, 4Hz) to the P6 acupuncture point of the right forearm and 2 cc iv saline 3 times daily; in group metoclopramide (Group M) inactive RB and iv l0 mg metoclopramide 3 times daily; in group control (Group C), inactive RB and 2 cc iv saline was given 15 minutes before induction. In all groups induction was performed with thiopental sodium 5-7 mg kg-1, 1 µg kg-1 fentanyl and vecuronium bromide 0.1 mg kg-1. Anaesthesia was maintained with 1.5 % isoflurane in 50 % O2 and 50 % N2O with a flow rate of 6L.There were no significant differences between the group RB and group M in terms of nausea-vomiting but the incidence of nausea in both groups was less than that of group C (p0.05). In group RB and group M, the amount of antiemetic drug consumption was less than that of group C at the 2nd, 6th and 24th hours (p

Özet

Çalışmamızın amacı, majör ortopedik cerrahilerde, postoperatif hasta kontrollü analjezide kullanılan morfinin neden olduğu bulantı ve kusmada, ReliefBandın etkinliğini değerlendirmektir.18-70 yaşlarında 42 hasta çalışmaya alınarak, randomize olarak 3 gruba ayrıldı. İndüksiyondan 15 dk. önce antiemetik yöntem olarak, Reliefband grubuna (Grup RB) sağ önkol P6 akupunktur noktasına aktif Reliefband (25mA, 4Hz) ile günde 3 defa 2 cc iv salin, metoklopramid grubuna (Grup M) günde 3 defa iv 10 mg metoklopramid ile inaktif Reliefband, kontrol grubuna (Grup K) inaktif Reliefband ile günde 3 defa 2 cc iv salin uygulandı. Tüm gruplarda indüksiyon 5-7 mg kg-1 tiyopental sodyum, 1 µg kg-1 fentanil, 0.1 mg kg-1 veküronyum bromid, idame % 50 O2 + % 50 N2O ve % 1.5 izofluran ile sağlandı. Tüm dönemlerde RB ile M grupları arasında bulantı ve kusma yönünden anlamlı fark yokken, bulantı sayısı kontrol grubuna göre daha azdı (p0.05). Tüm dönemlerde RB ve M gruplarında antiemetik ilaç gereksinimi K grubundan daha azdı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

CEYHAN, A., MISIRLIOĞLU, F., GÜZEY, A. N., ÖZEN, M., BALTACI, B. (2022). The effectiveness of reliefband and metoclopramide on morphine related nausea-vomiting in intravenous patient controlled analgesia. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 180–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/620172

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Benzon HT, Wang HY, Belavre AM, et al. A ran domized double-blind comparison of epidural fentanyl infusion versus PCA with morphine for post thoracotomy pain. Anesth Analg 1993; 76(2):316-322
  2. Mc Millan MC. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of Neiguan antiemetic acupuncture point in controlling sickness following opioid analgesia in majör orthopaedic surgery. Physiotherapy 1994; 80(l):5-9
  3. Dundee JW, Ghaly RG. Effect of stimulation of the P6 antiemetic point on PONV. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63:612-618
  4. Me Millan C, Dundee JW, Abranı WP. Enhancement of antiemetic action of ondansetron by transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the P6 antiemetic point in patients having highly emetics cytotoxic drugs. Br J Cancer 1991; 64:971-972
  5. Claybon L. Single dose intravenous ondansetron for the 24-hour treatment of postoperative nausea and vomit ing. Anaesthesia 1994; 49(Supp l):24-29
  6. Tramer MR. Arational approach to the control of post operative nausea and vomiting: evidence from systematic reviews. Part I. Efficacy and harm of antiemetic interven tions and some methodological issues. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001; 45:4-13
  7. Cohen MM, Duncan PG, Tweed WA. The postopera tive interview: assessing risk factors for nausea and vom iting. Anesth Analg 1994; 78(1):7-16
  8. Koivuranta M, Laara E, Snare L, Alahuhta S. A survey of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia 1997; 52:443-449. Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: its aetiology, treatment and prevention. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:162-184
  9. Tramer MR, Walder B. Efficacy and advers effects of prophylactic antiemetics during PCA therapy: a quanti tative systematic review. Anesth Analg 1999; 88:1354- 1361
  10. Tramer MR. Arational approach to the control of postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from sys tematic reviews. Part II. Recommedations for prevention and treatment and research agenda. Acta Anaesth Scand 2001; 45:14-19
  11. Kathirvei S, Shende O, Madan R. Comparison of antiemetic effects of ondansetron, metoclopramide or a combination of both in children undergoing surgery for strabismus. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16(11):761-765
  12. Eberhart LH, Seeling W, UIrich B, et al. Dimenhydrate and metoclopramide alone or in combina tion for prophylaxis of PONV. Can J Anaesth 2000; 47(8):780-785
  13. Domino KB, Anderson EA, Polissar NR, Posner KL. Comparative efficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol and metoclopramide for preventing postopera tive nausea and vomiti