Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

The comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with continuous epidural infusion analgesia for relief of labor pain

Doğum ağrısının giderilmesinde hasta kontrollü epidural analjezi ile sürekli epidural infüzyon analjezisinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
47–53
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

PCEA enables indiv idualized dose adjustment of the medication thus prevents use of high amounts of medication whilst minimazing the incidence of drug-related side-effects

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main goal of obstetrical care is to provide optimal analgesia to all the patients throughout labor.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The medications used in both groups were the same; 2 µg mL-1 fentanyl in 0.125 % bupivacain.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:PCEA enables indiv idualized dose adjustment of the medication thus prevents use of high amounts of medication whilst minimazing the incidence of drug-related side-effects
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main goal of obstetrical care is to provide optimal analgesia to all the patients throughout labor. This study aims to compare the safety, efficacy, the need for local anaesthetic and patient satisfaction of two methods: patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous epidural infusion analgesia (CEIA) during the first and second stage of labor. Forty one patients in labor with vertex presentation were randomized into two groups. The medications used in both groups were the same; 2 µg mL-1 fentanyl in 0.125 % bupivacain. In PCEA group the bolus dose of injection was 2 mL and lockout interval was 10 minutes while the CEIA group had an infusion of 12 mL per hour. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of pain relief and patient satisfaction and high patient satisfaction was obtained in both groups. The amount of bupivacain/fentanyl usage and the incidence of side-effects were higher in CEIA group. The most common side-effect was sedation. PCEA enables indiv idualized dose adjustment of the medication thus prevents use of high amounts of medication whilst minimazing the incidence of drug-related side-effects

Özet

Doğum analjezisinde anestezistin temel amacı, doğum eylemi boyunca optimal analjezi sağlamaktır. Bu çalışma; doğumun bir ve ikinci dönemi sırasında hasta kontrollü epidural analjezi (HKEA) ile sürekli epidural infüzyon analjezisinin (SEİA) emniyet, etkinlik, lokal anestetik kullanımı ve hasta memnuniyeti açısından karşılaştırılması amacı ile planlandı. Baş prezentasyonu olan 41 hasta, hasta kontrollü epidural analjezi (n=21) yada sürekli epidural infüzyon (n=20) uygulanmak üzere rasgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Her iki grupta da 2 µg mL-1 fentanil içeren % 0.125 bupivakain kullanıldı. HKEA grubunda bolus dozu 2 mL, kilitli kalma süresi 10 dk olarak ayarlandı, SEİA grubunda ise 12 mL $sa^{-1}$ olacak şekilde infüzyon yapıldı. Gruplar arasında ağrı rahatlaması ve hasta memnuniyeti açısından fark bulunmadı ve her iki teknikle de yüksek hasta memnuniyeti elde edildi. SEİA grubunda bupivakain/fentanil tüketimi ve yan etki insidansı daha yüksek bulundu. Yan etkiler içinde en sık sedasyona rastlandı. HKEA'nın, analjezik ilacın bireysel titrasyonuna olanak vererek fazla ilaç tüketimi ve buna bağlı oluşabilecek yan etkileri azaltan bir yöntem olduğu kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, S., ÖZMERT, G., ÇALIŞKAN, E., ŞEKERCİ, S., DİLBAZ, B., ÖZALP, G. (2022). The comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with continuous epidural infusion analgesia for relief of labor pain. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 47–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/620192

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Scull TJ, Hemmings GT, Carli F et al. Epidural analgesia in early labour blocks the stress response but uterine contractions remain unchanged Can J Anaesth 1998; 45(7):626-630
  2. Vyder MVD, Halpern S, Joseph G. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus continuous infusion for labour analgesia: a meta-analysis Br J Anaesth 2002; 11:459-465
  3. White PF. Mishaps with patient-controlled analgesia Anesthesiology 1987; 66(1):81-82
  4. Vıscomi C, Eısenach JC. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77:348-351
  5. Paech MJ. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour-is a continuous infusion of benefit? Anaesth Intensive Care 1992; 20:15-20
  6. Gambling DR, Yu P, McMorland GH, Palmer L. A comparative study of Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labour Can J Anaesth 1988; 35(3):249-254
  7. Gambling DR, Huber CJ, Berkowitz J et al. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour:varying bolus dose and lockout interval Can J Anaesth 1993; 40(3):211-217
  8. Ferrante FM, Rosinia FA, Gordon C, Datta S. The role of continuous background ınfusions in Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labour and delivery Anaesth Analg 1994; 79:80-84 9. Ferrante FM, Lu L, Jamison SB, Datta S. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: demand dosing Anaesth Analg 1991; 73:547-552
  9. Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK. Characteristics of normal labor Obstet Gynecol 1989; 74:85-87
  10. Bernard JM, Roux DL, Vizquel L et al. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: the effects of the increase in bolus and lockout interval Anaesth Analg 2000; 90:328-332
  11. Chestnut DH, Laszewski LJ, Pollack Kl et al. Continuous epidural ınfusions of 0.0625 % bupivacaine-0.0002 % fentanyl during the second stage of labor Anesthesiology 1990; 72:613-618.