Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of intranasal ketamine and midazolam premedication in pediatric patients

Pediyatrik olgularda intranazal ketamin ile midazolam premedikasyonunun karşılaştırılması

Pages
296–301
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In both groups, there was a significant decrease in SAB, DAB and HR values according to the baseline values (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After the approval of ethics' committee, 40 ASA I patients, aged between 2-7 years were divided into two groups. 30 min before operation, in group K (ketamine group), ketamine, 5 mg kg-1 and in group M (midazolam group), midazolam, 0.25 mg kg-1 were administered intranasally.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Peripheral O2 saturation (SpO2), systolic arterial blood pressure (SAB), diastolic arterial blood pressure (DAB), heart rate (HR) and respiration rate were recorded at 0, 10, 20, and 30th minutes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In both groups, there was a significant decrease in SAB, DAB and HR values according to the baseline values (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

After the approval of ethics' committee, 40 ASA I patients, aged between 2-7 years were divided into two groups. 30 min before operation, in group K (ketamine group), ketamine, 5 mg kg-1 and in group M (midazolam group), midazolam, 0.25 mg kg-1 were administered intranasally. Peripheral O2 saturation (SpO2), systolic arterial blood pressure (SAB), diastolic arterial blood pressure (DAB), heart rate (HR) and respiration rate were recorded at 0, 10, 20, and 30th minutes. Sedation levels of patients were evaluated according to the Ramsey Sedation Scale. Separation from the family were evaluated according to a three level scale; (0: Agitate 1: Calm, 2: Sleeping), iv cannulation condition were evaluated according to a three level scale (1:Agitate 2:Pulling his hand away 3:No reaction). Postoperative Aldrete recovery scores and adverse effects were recorded. Demographic data, SpO2 and respiratory rate were similar in both groups. In both groups, there was a significant decrease in SAB, DAB and HR values according to the baseline values (p

Özet

Çalışmamızda, pediatrik hastalarda, intranazal ketamin ve midazolam premedikasyonunun, etkinliği ve güvenilirliği karşılaştırıldı. Etik kurul onayından sonra, 2-7 yaş arasında ASA I, 40 olgu 2 gruba ayrıldı. Operasyondan 30 dk. önce Grup K’ya (ketamin grup) 5 mg kg-1 ketamin, Grup M’ye (midazolam grup) 0.25 mg kg-1 midazolam intranazal uygulandı. Olguların periferik O2 saturasyonu (SpO2), sistolik arter basıncı (SAB), diastolik arter basıncı (DAB), kalp atım hızı (KAH) ve solunum sayısı 0., 10., 20. ve 30. dakikada kaydedildi. Olguların sedasyon düzeyleri Ramsey sedasyon skalasına göre değerlendirildi. Aileden ayrılma 3 basamaklı skala (0:Ajite, 1:Sakin 2:Uyuyor), iv kanül yerleştirme 3 basamaklı skala (1:Ajite, 2:Elini çekiyor, 3:Tepki yok) ve operasyon sonrası derlenme skorları Aldrete skorlaması ile değerlendirildi ve yan etkiler kaydedildi. Demografik veriler, SpO2 ve solunum sayısı açısından gruplar arasında fark bulunmadı. Her iki grupta da bazal değere göre KAH, SAB, DAB’ında düşme görüldü. Ancak, Grup M’de sistolik arter basıncındaki düşme Grup K’dan daha belirgindi (p0.05). Aileden ayrılma skorları her iki grupta farklı bulunmadı. Aldrete skorları, Grup K’da daha yüksek bulunmasına karşın, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmadı (p=0.17). Grup K’da 4 olguda diplopi ve nistagmus izlendi. Bulgularımızda izlenen midazolam ile daha derin sedasyon ve ketamin ile daha hızlı derlenmenin premedikasyonda, ajan seçiminde yönlendirici olabileceği kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

OK, G., ERBÜYÜN, K., MİRZAİ, T. İ., LEBLEBİCİ, H. (2022). Comparison of intranasal ketamine and midazolam premedication in pediatric patients. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 296–301. https://ajindex.com/articles/620190

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Govaerts MJ, Capouet V. Rectal benzodiazepines for premedication in children. Review and personal experience. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1987
  2. Esener Z. İntravenöz anestezikler. Klinik Anestezi. Logos Yayıncılık, İstanbul 1997, 98-101. 3.Gutstein HB, Johnson KL, Heard MB, et al. Oral ketamine preanesthetic medication in children. Anesthesiology 1992
  3. Rose E, Simon D, Haberer JP. Premedication with intranasal midazolam in pediatric anesthesia. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1990
  4. 9(4):326-330. 5.Garcia-Velasco P, Roman J, Beltran de Heredia B, et al. Nasal ketamine compared with nasal midazolam in premedication in pediatrics. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1998
  5. 45(4): 122-125. 6.Malinovsky JM, Populaire C, Cozian A, et al. Premedication with midazolam in children. Effect of intranasal, rectal and oral routes on plasma midazolam concentrations. Anaesthesia. 1995
  6. 50(4):351-354. 7.Aydın ON, Gürsoy F, Uğur B. Çocuklarda diazepam, ketamin ve midazolam ile rektal premedikasyonun değerlendirilmesi.Türk Anest Rean Cem Mecmuası 2001
  7. Beebe DS, Belani KG, Chang Pi-N, et al. Effectiveness of preoperative sedation with rectal midazolam ketamine or their combination in young children. Anesth Analg 1992, 75:880-884. 9.Diaz JH. Intranasal ketamine preinduction of paediatric outpatients. Paediatr Anaesth. 1997
  8. 7(4):273-278. 10.Me Graw T. Preparing children for the operating room. Psychological issues. Can J Anaesth 1994
  9. Filatov SM, Baer GA, Rorarius GF, Oikkonen M. Efficacy and safety of premedication with oral ketamine for daycase adenoidectomy compared with rectal diazepam/diclofenac and EMLA. Acta Anaesthiol Scand 2000
  10. Weksler N, Ovadia L, Muati G, Stav A. Nasal ketamine for paediatric premedication. Can J Anaesth 1993
  11. 40(2): 119-121. 13.Tolksdorf W, Eick C, Amberger M. Premedication in preschool children with oral rectal and nasal midazolam. Anaesth Analg 1992
  12. Gudmundsdottir H, Sigurjonsdottir JF, Masson M, Fjalldal O, Stefansson E, Loftsson T. Intranasal administration of midazolam in a cyclodcxtrin based formulation: bioavailability and clinical evaluation in humans. Pharmazie. 2001
  13. 56(12):963-966. 15. Tanaka M, Sato M, Saito A, Nishikawa T. Revaluation of rectal ketamin premedication in children comparison with rectal midazolam. Anesthesiology 2000
  14. Spear RM, Yaster M, Berkowitz ID, Maxwell LG, Bender KS, Naderio R, et al. Preinduction of anesthesia in children with rectally admi