Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 5

Efficacy of ropivacaine and ropivacaine+neostigmine combination for elective cesarean sectio

Sezaryen operasyonlarında intratekal ropivakain ve ropivakain+neostigminin anestezik etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
305–311
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No statistically note-worthy difference was determined.In conclusion, the time until first analgesic requirement is increased by 25 µgr neostigmine without any adverse effect although there wasn’t any significant difference.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Efficacy of Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine+Neostigmine Combination for Elective Cesarean SectioThe objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of intrathecal ropivacaine and the combination of ropivacaine with neostigmine for elective cesarean sectio.Forty ASA grade I-II parturients were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Grup 1 received 15 mg of 0.75 % hyperbaric ropivacaine.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No statistically note-worthy difference was determined.In conclusion, the time until first analgesic requirement is increased by 25 µgr neostigmine without any adverse effect although there wasn’t any significant difference.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Efficacy of Ropivacaine and Ropivacaine+Neostigmine Combination for Elective Cesarean SectioThe objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of intrathecal ropivacaine and the combination of ropivacaine with neostigmine for elective cesarean sectio.Forty ASA grade I-II parturients were scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Grup 1 received 15 mg of 0.75 % hyperbaric ropivacaine. Group 2 received 15 mg of % 0.75 hyperbaric ropivacaine combined with 25 µgr neostigmine. Hyperbaric solutions were made with 2 ml of 0.75 % ropivacaine and 0.5 ml of 20 % dextrose. After injection of the spinal medication patients were turned head up 20-30° supine. Baseline mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry were recorded and every 5 min during the surgery the same parameters also sensory block level, motor block degree were recorded. Sensory block, motor block and VAS scores were recorded postoperatively at first, second and forth hour. Time until first analgesic requirement and total analgesic consumption in the first 24 hours were recorded.Homodynamic changes, sensory block level, motor block degree, VAS scores, time until first analgesic requirement, postoperative total analgesic consumption were similar among two groups. No statistically note-worthy difference was determined.In conclusion, the time until first analgesic requirement is increased by 25 µgr neostigmine without any adverse effect although there wasn’t any significant difference.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, sezaryen operasyonu uygulanacak gebelerde intratekal yolla uygulanan ropivakain ile ropivakain + neostigmin kombinasyonlarının anestezik etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. ASA I-II, 18-42 yaş arasındaki 40 olgu rasgele iki gruba ayrılarak çalışmaya dahil edildi. Grup I’e spinal anestezi için 15 mg % 0.75 ropivakain (2 ml) + 0.5 ml % 20 dekstroz uygulandı. Grup II’ye spinal anestezi için 15 mg % 0.75 ropivakain (2 ml) + 0.5 ml % 20 dekstroz çözeltisinde hazırlanmış 25 µgr neostigmin çözeltisi uygulandı. Spinal anestezi uygulandıktan sonra hastalar supin pozisyonda baş 20-30° yukarıda olacak şekilde yatırıldı. Spinal anestezi uygulanmasının beş dakika öncesinden başlanarak KAH, OAB ve SpO2 değerleri, spinal anestezinin uygulanmasıyla da 5’er dakika aralarla DB ve MB seviyeleri değerlendirilerek tüm operasyon boyunca kaydedildi. Postop dönemde 1., 2, ve 4. saatlerde KAH, OAB, SpO2, DB ve MB seviyeleri ile VAS skorları izlenerek kaydedildi. VAS >4 olan hastalara analjezik uygulanarak, bu ilk analjezik gereksinimine kadar geçen süreler ve toplam analjezik tüketimi kaydedildi.Her iki grupta ilk analjezi ihtiyacına kadar geçen süreler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmadı. KAH, OAB ve değerleri iki grup arasında benzerdi. DB ve MB seviyeleri ile VAS skorları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunamadı.Sonuç olarak, intratekal 25 µgr neostigminin, yan etkiye yol açmadan, ilk analjezik gereksinimine kadar geçen süreyi, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmasa da uzattığı gözlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

OK, G., ERBÜYÜN, K., ÖZASLAN, S., MİRZAİ, T. İ. (2022). Efficacy of ropivacaine and ropivacaine+neostigmine combination for elective cesarean sectio. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 5, 305–311. https://ajindex.com/articles/654703

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Omais M, Lauretti GR, Cleber A.J. Paccola L. Epidural Morphine and Neostigmine for Postoperative Analgesia After Orthopedic Surgery. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:1698-1701
  2. Micheal J. Cousins, Phillip O. Bridenbaugh. Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain 3rd Ed. Lippincott-Raven, New York 1998; 4:122
  3. Zaric D, Nydahl-PA, Adel SO, et al. The effect of continous lumbar epidural infusion of ropivacaine (0.1 %, 0.2 %, and 0.3 %) and 0.25 % bupivacaine on sensory and motor block in volunteers: A double-blind study. Reg Anesth 1996; 21:14-25
  4. Pederson H, Santos A, Morishima HA. Systemic toxicity of ropivacaine in pregnant and non-pregnant ewes. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:A344
  5. Abouleish EI. Epinephrine improves quality of spinal anesthesia of bupivacaine. Anesthesiology 1986; 65:A375
  6. McClure, JH. Ropivacaine (Review) Br J Anaesth 1996; 76:300
  7. Naguib M, Yaksh TL. Antinociceptive effects of spinal cholinesterase inhibition and isobolographic analysis of the interaction with µ and a2 receptor systems. Anesthesiology 1994; 80:1338-1348
  8. Hood DD, Eisenach JC, Tuttle R. Phase I safety assessment of intratechal neostigmine methylsulfate in humans (clinical investigation). Anesthesiology 1995; 82:331-343
  9. Alparslan Turan, Dilek Memiş, Ümit N. Bas¸et al. Caudal Ropivacaine and Neostigmine in Pediatric Surgery Anesthesiology 2003; 98:719-722
  10. James A. Krukowski, David D. Hood, James C. Eisenach, et al. Intrathecal Neostigmine for Post-Cesarean Section Analgesia: Dose ResponseAnesth Analg 1997; 84:1269-1275
  11. Chan-Jong Chung, MD, Ji-Su Kim, MD, Han-Suk Park, MD, and Young-Jhoon Chin, MD. The Efficacy of lntrathecal Neostigmine, Intrathecal Morphine, and Their Combination for Post-Cesarean Section Analgesia. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:341-346
  12. Griffin RP, Reynolds F. Extradural anaesthesia for caesarean section: A double-bilnd comparision of % 0.5 ropivacaine with 0.55 bupivacaine. Br J Anaest 1995; 74:512-516
  13. Datta S, Camann W, Bader A, et al. Clinical effects and maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:1346-1352
  14. Kim S. Khaw, FRCA, Warwick D. Ngan Kee, et al. Spinal Ropivacaine for Cesarean Delivery: A Comparison of Hyperbaric and Plain Solutions. Anesth Analg 2002; 94:680-685
  15. H. Kallio, E.-V.T. Snall, C.A. Tuomas and P.H. Rosenberg et al. Comparison of hyperbaric and plain ropivacaine 15 mg in spinal anaesthesia for lowe