SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

The comparison of the method for cardiac output measurement in mechanically ventilated critical care unit patients

Mekanik ventilasyon uygulanan yoğun bakım hastalarında kardiyak output ölçümünde yöntem karşılaştırması

Haluk KAFALI
Nur KUNT
Caner MİMAROĞLU
Sinan GÜRSOY
Kenan KAYGUSUZ
Pages
328–332
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There were a high correlation in cardiac output between the methods at the two measurement (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Although the thermodilution technique for cardiac output monitorization is the most common used clinical method, it is very invasive and has all risks of this.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore the importance of the noninvasive cardiac output measurement technique is increased.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There were a high correlation in cardiac output between the methods at the two measurement (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Although the thermodilution technique for cardiac output monitorization is the most common used clinical method, it is very invasive and has all risks of this. Therefore the importance of the noninvasive cardiac output measurement technique is increased. In this study we aimed to compare the safety of thermodilution method and partial CO2 rebreathing fick technique which is a noninvasive method, at the cardiac output measurement of mechanically ventilated critical care unit patients.Materials and Methods: The study was scheduled to 32 critical care unit patients who were between 23-75 ages and needed mechanical ventilation. Patients ventilated on controlled mechanical ventilation mode. Cardiac output measurements were done twice simultaneously in 4 hours intervals by invasive and noninvasively.Results: There were no statistically differences in cardiac output between the methods at the two measurement (p>0.05). There were a high correlation in cardiac output between the methods at the two measurement (p

Özet

Amaç: Kardiyak output monitorizasyonu için termodilüsyon tekniği en yaygın klinik uygulama olmasına rağmen, invaziv bir tekniktir ve bunun olası risklerini taşır. Bu nedenle invaziv olmayan kardiyak output ölçüm tekniklerinin önemi artmaktadır. Bu çalışmada mekanik ventilasyon uygulanan yoğun bakım hastalarının, kardiyak output ölçümünde noninvaziv yöntem olan parsiyel CO2 geri soluma tekniğinin güvenirliğini termodilüsyon yöntemi ile karşılaştırmayı amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma mekanik ventilasyon gerektiren 23-75 yaşları arasında 32 yoğun bakım hastasında planlandı. Hastalar kontrollü mekanik ventilasyon modunda solutuldu. Kardiyak output ölçümleri invaziv ve noninvaziv olarak 4 saat arayla 2 kez eşzamanlı yapıldı.Bulgular: İki ölçümde de kardiyak output değerlerinde yöntemler arasında istatistiksel fark olmadığı gibi (p>0.05), her iki yöntemle ölçülen kardiyak output değerlerinde yüksek korelasyon tespit edildi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAFALI, H., KUNT, N., MİMAROĞLU, C., GÜRSOY, S., KAYGUSUZ, K. (2022). The comparison of the method for cardiac output measurement in mechanically ventilated critical care unit patients. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 328–332. https://ajindex.com/articles/620134

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Gomez CM, Palozzo MG. Pulmoner artery catheteriza¬ tion in anesthesia and intensive care: Review article. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81:945-956
  2. Mermel LA, Maki DG. Infectious complications of Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheters. Pathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention and management. Am J Respir Crit CareMed 1994; 149:1020-1036
  3. Hirschl MM, Binder M, Gwechenberger M, et al. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output in critically ill patients by analysis of the finger blood pressure waveform.Crit Care Med 1997; 25:1909-1914
  4. Odenstedt H, Stenqvist O, Lundin S. Clinical evaluation of a partial CO2 rebreathing technique for cardiac output monitoring in critically ill patients. Acta Anaesthhesiol Scand 2002; 46:152-159
  5. Segal J, Nassi M, Ford AJ, Schuenemeyer TD. Instantaneous and continuous cardiac output in humans obtained with a Doppler pulmonary artery catheter. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16:1398-1407
  6. Connors AF, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al. The effec tiveness of right heard catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. JAMA 1996; 276:889-897
  7. Heerden PV, Baker S, Lim SI, Weidman C, Bulsara M. Clinical evaluation of the non-invasive cardiac output (NICO) monitor in the intensive care unit. Anaesth Inten¬sive Care 2000; 28:427-430
  8. Binder JC, Parkin WG. Non-invasive cardiac output determination: Comparison of a new partial-rebreathing technique with thermodilution. Anaesth Intensive Care 2001; 29:19-23
  9. Nilsson LB, Eldrup N, Berthelsen PG. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and carbon dioxide-rebreathing cardiac output. Acta Anaesth Scand 2001; 45:680-685
  10. Maxwell RA, Gibson JB, Slade JB, Fabian TC, Proctor KG. Noninvasive cardiac output by partial CO2 rebreathing after severe chest trauma. J Trauma 2001; 51:849-853
  11. Matthay MA, Chaterjee K. Bedside catheterization of the pulmonary artery: Risks compared with benefits. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109:826-834
  12. Dobb GJ, Donavan KD. Non-invasive methods of measuring cardiac output. Intensive Care Med 1987; 13:304-309
  13. Murias GE, Villagra A, Vatua S, et al. Evaluation of a noninvasive method for cardiac output measurement in critical care patients. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28:1470-1474
  14. Lands LC, Canny G, Xu F, Coates AL. Noninvasive determination of cardiac output in patients with severe airflow limitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 153:981-984
  15. Pianosi P, Hochman J. End-tidal estimates of arterial PCO2 for cardiac output measurement by CO2 rebrea