Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

The effects of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or ropivacaine on postoperative analgesia

Bupivakain ya da ropivakain ile insizyon bölgesi infiltrasyonunun postoperatif analjezi üzerine etkileri

Pages
145–150
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

VRS was 1.73±0.79 and 1.16±0.59 in Group I and II respectively,three hours after surgery (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Local anaesthetic infiltration may improve postoperative analgesia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine infitration for postoperative analgesia. when they used for wound infiltration.Materials and Methods: Fourty female patients (30-65 yrs, ASA I-II) scheduled for cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to receive either bupivacaine (2.5 mg mL-1, Group I) or ropivacaine (3.75 mg mL-1, Group II) for infiltration anaesthesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:VRS was 1.73±0.79 and 1.16±0.59 in Group I and II respectively,three hours after surgery (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Local anaesthetic infiltration may improve postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine infitration for postoperative analgesia. when they used for wound infiltration.Materials and Methods: Fourty female patients (30-65 yrs, ASA I-II) scheduled for cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to receive either bupivacaine (2.5 mg mL-1, Group I) or ropivacaine (3.75 mg mL-1, Group II) for infiltration anaesthesia. A standardized intraoperatif anaesthetic was performed in all patients. Induction with fentanyl 1 mcg kg-1, thiopenthal 6 mg kg-1 and vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1 intravenously was followed by maintenance of anaesthesia with sevoflurane % 1 in nitrous oxide 50 % in oxygen mixture. Additional opioid requirements were recorded. During incision closure each group subject recieved a total of 40 mL of local anaesthetic infiltrated in the peritonel, muscle, fascia and subcutaneous layers (10 mL to each layer). Pain was assessed by verbal rating scale (VRS), and nausea by visual analogue scale (VAS) one, three and five hours following surgery.Results: There were no differences between groups with respect to anaesthesia duration, fentanyl requirements and VRS at the first hour following surgery. VRS was 1.73±0.79 and 1.16±0.59 in Group I and II respectively,three hours after surgery (p

Özet

Amaç: Lokal anestezik infilitrasyonu postoperatif analjezi sağlıyabilir. Çalışmamızda, bupivakain ya da ropivakain infiltrasyonunun, postoperatif ağrı tedavisindeki etkinliklerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı.Gereç ve Yöntem: ASA I-II grubunda, 30-65 yaş arası kolesistektomi yapılması planlanan toplam 40 kadın olgu randomize olarak iki gruba ayrılarak (Grup I:2.5 mg mL-1) bupivakain veya (Grup II: 3.75 mg mL-1) ropivakain infilitrasyonu yapıldı. Bütün olgulara standart anestezi uygulandı. 1 mcg kg-1 fentanil, 6 mg kg-1 tiyopental, 0.1 mg kg-1 vekuronyum ile % 1 ile yapılan anestezi indüksiyonundan sonra anestezi idamesi sevofluran ve % 50 N2O/O2 karışımı ile sağlandı. Ek doz opiyoid ihtiyaçları kaydedildi. Operasyonun sonunda her kata 10'ar ml olmak üzere periton, kas, fasya ve cilt altına lokal anestezik infiltrasyonu yapıldı. Ağrı şiddetleri, postoperatif dönemde 1., 3. ve 5. saatlerde Sözel Numerik Skala ile değerlendirildi. Bulantı derecelerinin belirlenmesi için Görsel Analog Skalası (VAS) kullanıldı.Bulgular: Cerrahiyi takip eden ilk saatte her iki grubun anestezi süreleri, toplam fentanil kullanımları ve değerleri arasında fark saptanmadı. Sözel Numerik Skala değerleri ilk saatte istatistiksel olarak farklı bulunmazken, 3. saatteki değerler arasında anlamlı fark saptandı (Grup I: 1.73±0.79, Grup II: 1.16±0.59, p

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKKIRLI, H., BOMBACI, E., ÇOLAKOĞLU, S., ÇEVİK, B., SEZEN, Ö. (2022). The effects of wound infiltration with bupivacaine or ropivacaine on postoperative analgesia. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 145–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/620111

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Erdine S. AĞRI
  2. Baskı. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi;2002; 118-136
  3. Patel JM, Lanzafame RJ, Williams JS, Mullen BV, Hj|pshaw JR. The effect of incisional infiltration of bupivtcaine hydrochloride upon pulmonary functions, atelectasis and narcotic need following electivecholecystectomy.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983; 157:338-340
  4. Rawal N, Axelsson K, Hylander J, et al. Postoperative patient controlled local anesthetics administration at home. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:86-89
  5. Kopacz D J, Carpenter RL, Mackey DC. Effect of ropivacaine on cutaneous capillary blood flow in pigs. Anesthesiology 1989; 71:69-74
  6. Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, et al. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1989; 69:563-569
  7. McClure JH. Ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1996, 76:300-309
  8. Zohar E, Fredman B, Phillipov A, Jedeikin R, Shapiro A. The analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled bupivacaine wound instillation after total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salphingo-oopherectomy. Anesth Analg 2001; 93:482-487
  9. Miller DR. Anesthesia. 4 th edition. New York: Churchill Livingston Inc; 1994; 489-552
  10. Moiniche S, Mikkelsen S, Wetterslev J, Dahi JB. A qualitive systematic review of incisional local anaesthesia for postoperative pain relief after abdominal operations. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81:377-383
  11. Pettersson N, Berggren P, Larsson M, Westman B, Hahn RG. Pain relief by wound infiltration with bupivacaine or high dose ropivacaine after inguinal hernia repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999; 24:569-575
  12. Yaşar MA, Erdoğan M, Özmiş M, Akkuş MA, Erhan ÖL. Tiroid cerrahisinde uygulanan bupivakain infiltrasyonunun postoperatif analjezik etkinliği. Ağrı 1994;9:35-38
  13. Bilgin TE, Atıcı Ş, Altunkan ZÖ ve ark. İnfiltratif 0.5 ve % 0.25'lik bupivakain uygulamasının postoperatif analjezi üzerine olan etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. Türk Anest Rean Der Dergisi 2003; 31:462-467
  14. Horn EP, Schroeder F, Wilhelm S, et al. Wound infiltration and drain lavage with ropivacaine after major shoulder surgery. Anesth Analg 1999; 89:1461-1466
  15. Johansson A, Axelson J, Ingvar C, Luttropp HH, Lundberg J. Preoperative ropivacaine infiltration in breast surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000; 44:1093-1098
  16. Klein JR, Heaton JP, Thompson JP, et al. Infiltration of the abdominal wall with local anesthetic after total abdominal hysterectomy has no opioid-sparing effect. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:248-249
  17. Ericsen CJ, Vibits H, Dahi JB, Kehlet H. Wound infilt