Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of propofol with sevoflurane during insertion of larygeal tube

Laringeal tüp uygulamasında propofol ile sevofluranın karşılaştırılması

Pages
30–33
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results were compared with Fisher's exact test and Student's-t test (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study we compared the effectiveness of propofol and sevoflurane during insertion of laryngeal tube.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Midazolam and atropine were administered 30 munites before operation for premedication.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results were compared with Fisher's exact test and Student's-t test (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study we compared the effectiveness of propofol and sevoflurane during insertion of laryngeal tube. Twenty-two patients were randomly divided into two groups. Midazolam and atropine were administered 30 munites before operation for premedication. Laryngeal tube (LT) was inserted after providing loss of eyelash reflex and jaw relaxation with fentanyl 1ug kg-1, propofol 2.5mg kg-1 or sevoflurane 6 % and N2O:O2 50 %. Apnea, airway obstruction, laryngospasm, cough, desaturation, movement of patient, unsuccessful attempts and requirement of supplement dose were recorded during the insertion. Blood pressure,heart rate, SpO2 were recorded before induction, during the procedure, 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th minutes after insertion. Results were compared with Fisher's exact test and Student's-t test (p

Özet

Bu çalışmada, kas gevşemesi gerektirmeyen kısa süre-x li jinekolojik cerrahi girişimlerde laringeal tüp (LT) uygulamasında propofol ile sevofluranın etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması amaçlandı. Rasgele iki eşit gruba ayrılan olgulara midazolam ve atropin ile girişimden 30 dakika önce premedikasyon uygulandı. Tüm olgularda anestezi indüksiyonu fentanil 1 ug kg-1 ile propofol 2.5mg kg-1 yada sevofluran % 6 ve N2O:O2 % 50 verilerek sağlandı. Kirpik refleksi kaybı ve çene gevşemesini takiben, olgunun vücut ağırlığına göre önerilen boyutta LT yerleştirildi. Yerleşim sırasında ap-ne, direnç, öksürük, laringospazm, desatürasyon, hareket, deneme sayısı, ek doz gereksinimi kaydedildi. Kan basınçları, kalp hızı ve SpO2, indüksiyon öncesinde, girişimde ve sonraki 1.,3.,5.ve 7. dakikalarda ölçüldü. Veriler Student's-t ve Fisher's exact testiyle karşılaştırıldı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BÜYÜKKIRLI, H., BOMBACI, E., ÇOLAKOĞLU, S., SEZEN, Ö. (2022). Comparison of propofol with sevoflurane during insertion of larygeal tube. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 30–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/535687

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Dörges V. Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P. The laryngeal tube: A new simple airway device. Anesth Analg 2000; 90:1220-2. 2.Ökeşli P: Günübirlik (outpatient) anestezide pehoperatif yaklaşım. TARK2000 Özet Kitabı, s.165-173. 3.Monies FR. Trillos JE, Rincon IE, Giraldo JC. Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia for outpatient otorhinolaryngeal surgery. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14(5):324-8. 4.Smith I, Nathanson M, White PF. The role of sevoflurane in outpatient anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1995; 81; 1-10. 5.Song D, Joshi GP, White PF. Fast-Track eligibility after ambulatory anesthesia:A comparison of desflurane, sevoflurane and propofol. Anesth Analg 1998; 86 (2):267-73. 6.Genzwuerker HV, Hilker T Hohner E, Kuhnert B. The laryngeal tube: A new adjunct for airway management. Prehosp Emerg Care 2000; 4:168-72. 7.Asai T Kawashima A, Hidaka I, Kawachi S. The laryngeal tube compared with the laryngeal mask: insertion, gas leak pressure and gastric insufflation. BrJAnaesth 2002; 89 (5): 729-32. 8.Ocker H, Wenzel V, Schmucker P, Steinfath M, Dörges V. A comparison of the laryngeal tube with the laryngeal mask airway during routine surgical procedures. Anesth Analg 2002; 95 (4): 1094-7. 9.Hui JK, Critchley LA, Karmakar MK, Lam PK. Co-administration of the alfentanil- propofol improves laryngeal mask airway inser tion compared to fentanyl - propofol. Can J Anaesth 2002: 49(5); 508-12. 10.Besler MP, Çelik M, Sağıroğlu G, Sağıroğlu E. Kepçe T. Çocuklarda kısa süreli minor cerrahi girişimlerde "larengeal maske "ve" larengeal tüp" uygulaması. Türk Anest Rean Cem Mec 2002; 30:376-81. 11.Smith CE, Lever JS, Sawkar S, PinchakAC, Hagen JF. SevofIurane-N2Q versus propofol/isoflurane-N20 during elective surgery using the laryngeal mask airway in adults. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12 (5): 392-6. 12.Ti LK, Chow MY, Lee TL. Comparison of the sevoflurane with propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults. Anesth Analg 1999:88(4):908-12. 13.Joo HS, Perks WJ. Sevoflurane versus propofol for anesthetic induction: a meta analysis. Anesth Analg 2000: 91 (1): 213-9. 14.Molloy ME, Buggy DJ, Scanlon P. Propofol or sevoflurane for laryngeal mask airway insertion. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46 (4): 322-6. 15.Blake DW, Hogg MN, Hackman CH, Pang J, BjorkstenAR. Induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane, preprogrammed propotol infusion or combined sevoflurane/ propofol for laryngeal mask insertion: cardiovascular, movement and EEG bispectral index responses. Anaes