SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of anesthetic effects of 0.5 %, 0.75 % Ropivacaine and 0.5 % Bupivacaine on axillary brachial plexus blocade

Aksiller blok uygulamasında % 0.5 Ropivakain, % 0.75 Ropivakain ve % 0.5 Bupivakainin anestezik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Leyla KILINÇ
Hale DOBRUCALI
Özer Surhan ÇINAR
G. Ulufer SİVRİKAYA
Ayşe HANCI
Pages
16–22
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hemodynamic parameters, onset of sensory and motor block, offset of sensory and motor block, local anaesthetic consumption per kg., side effects and sensory and motor block level in each stimulated nerves (musculocutanaeus, median, ulnar, radial) after axillary injection 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th and 30th minutes were recorded.Results: Onset of sensory block duration in group II was shorter than (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Aim of this study was to compare the anaesthetic effects of 0.5 %, 0.75 % ropivacaine and 0.5 % bupivacaine on axillary brachial plexus blocade.Material and Methods: 60 patients in ASA I-II aged 18-60 years for hand and forearm surgery were enrolled the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All patients were premedicated with 0.02 mg kg-1 iv midazolam.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hemodynamic parameters, onset of sensory and motor block, offset of sensory and motor block, local anaesthetic consumption per kg., side effects and sensory and motor block level in each stimulated nerves (musculocutanaeus, median, ulnar, radial) after axillary injection 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th and 30th minutes were recorded.Results: Onset of sensory block duration in group II was shorter than (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Aim of this study was to compare the anaesthetic effects of 0.5 %, 0.75 % ropivacaine and 0.5 % bupivacaine on axillary brachial plexus blocade.Material and Methods: 60 patients in ASA I-II aged 18-60 years for hand and forearm surgery were enrolled the study. All patients were premedicated with 0.02 mg kg-1 iv midazolam. Axillary block was performed 22 gauge needle with nerve stimulation technique. Patients separeted into 3 groups. Patients received in group I (n=20) 40 mL 0.5 % ropivacaine, in group II (n=20) 40 ml 0.75 % ropivacaine and group III (n=20) 40 mL 0.5 % bupivacaine. Hemodynamic parameters, onset of sensory and motor block, offset of sensory and motor block, local anaesthetic consumption per kg., side effects and sensory and motor block level in each stimulated nerves (musculocutanaeus, median, ulnar, radial) after axillary injection 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th and 30th minutes were recorded.Results: Onset of sensory block duration in group II was shorter than (p

Özet

Amaç: Aksiller blok uygulamasında % 0.5 ropivakain, % 0.75 ropivakain ve % 0.5 bupivakainin anestezik etkilerinin karşılaştırılması planlandı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya el ve önkol cerrahisi geçirecek , ASA I-II grubu, 18-60 yaş arası 60 olgu katıldı. Tüm olgular midazolam iv 0.02 mg kg-1 ile premedike edildi. Brakial pleksus 22 G iğne kullanılarak sinir stimulasyonu tekniği ile bulundu. Üç gruba ayrılan olgulara, Grup I'de % 0.5 ropivakain, Grup II'de % 0.75 ropivakain, Grup III'de % 0.5 bupivakain 40 mL aksiller kılıf içine verildi. Hemodinamik parametreler, duyusal ve motor bloğun başlama süresi, duyusal ve motor bloğun ortadan kalkma süreleri, kilo başına düşen lokal anestezik miktarı ve yan etkiler ile muskulokutan, mediyan, ulnar, radiyal sinir innervasyon bölgesindeki duyusal ve motor blok düzeyleri ilaç verildikten sonra 5., 10., 15., 20. ve 30. dakikalarda kaydedildi.Bulgular: Grup II'de duyusal blok başlama süresi Grup I (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KILINÇ, L., DOBRUCALI, H., ÇINAR, Ö. S., SİVRİKAYA, G. U., HANCI, A. (2022). Comparison of anesthetic effects of 0.5 %, 0.75 % Ropivacaine and 0.5 % Bupivacaine on axillary brachial plexus blocade. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 16–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/620033

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Wedel DJ. Nerve Blocks. In: Miller RD (ed) Anesthesia. 5th edition. Pennsylvania: Churchill Livimgstone 2000; 1540-1548
  2. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Larson CP. Clinical Anesthesiology. 3.edition New York: McGraw Hill Co 2002; 283-308
  3. Leisure AS, Daifazio C. Ropivacaine: The new local anesthetic. Seminars in anesthesia 1996; 15:1-9
  4. Tetzlaff JE. Ropivacaine. In: Clinical pharmacology of local anesthetics. Woburn: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000; 125-132
  5. Vainionpaa VA, Haavisto ET, Huha TM, et al. A clinical and pharmacokinetic comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in axillary plexus block. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:534-538
  6. Owen MD, Dean LS. Ropivacaine. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2000; 1:325-336
  7. Akerman B, Hellberg IB, Trossvik C. Primary evaluation of local anaesthetic proporties of the amino amide agent ropivacaine. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1988; 32:571-578
  8. Feldman HS. Toxicity of local anesthetic agents. In: Rice SA. Fish KJ, eds. Anesthetic Toxicity. Raven Press, New York 1994; 107-133
  9. McClure JH. Ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76:300-307
  10. Hickey R, Candido KD, Ramamurthy S, et al. Brachial plexus block with a new local anaesthetic: 0.5 % ropivacaine. Can J Anaesth 1990; 37:732-738
  11. Klein SM, Greengrass RA, Steele SM, et al. A comparison of 0.5 % bupivacaine, 0.5 % ropivacaine and 0.75 % ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:1316-1319
  12. Salonen MH, Haasio J, Bachmann M, Xu M, Rosenberg PH. Evaluation of efficacy and plasma concentrations of ropivacaine in continuous axillary brachial plexus block: high dose for surgical anesthesia and low dose for postoperative analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000; 25:47-51
  13. Arthur GR, Feldman HS, Covino BG. Comparative pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic. Anesth Analg 1988; 67:1053-1058
  14. Zaric D, Nydahl PA, Philipson L, et al. The effect of continuous lumbar epidural infusion of ropivacaine (0.1 %, 0.2 %, and 0.3 %) and 0.25 % bupivacaine on sensory and motor block in volunteers: a double-blind study. Reg Anesth 1996; 21:14-25
  15. Tuttle AA, Katz JA, Bridenbaugh PO, Quinlan R, Knarr D. A double-blind comparison of the abdominal wall relaxation produced by epidural 0.75 % ropivacaine and 0.75 % bupivacaine in gynecologic surgery. Reg Anesth 1995; 20:515-520
  16. Emanuelsson BM, Mcclure JH, Pollok AJ, et al. Efficacy and kinetics of extradural ropivacaine: comparison with bupivacaine. Br J Ana