Journals / Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 5

Comparison of remifentanil sevoflurane and remifentanil propofol hypotensive anaesthesia for middle ear surgery

Orta kulak cerrahisinde hipotansif anestezide remifentanil-sevofluran ve remifentanil-propofol kombinasyonlarının karşılaştırılması

Pages
400–405
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

HR was higher after extubation compared to pre-induction values in Group S (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to compare remifentanil-sevoflurane and remifentanil-propofol hypotensive anaesthesia, for in middle ear surgery and associated, perioperative bleeding, haemodynamics and postoperative recovery characteristics.Materials and Methods: Thirty-six ASA physical status I-II patients were randomized into two groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Induction of anaesthesia consisted of remifentanil (1 µg kg-1), rocuronium (0.6 mg kg-1) and either, 6 % sevoflurane (Group S) or 2 mg kg-1 propofol (Group P) Maintenance of anaesthesia consisted of a continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.25 µg kg-1 min-1, and 1-2 % sevoflurane (Group S) or 6 mg kg-1 h-1 propofol continuous infusion (Group P) with O2-N2O.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:HR was higher after extubation compared to pre-induction values in Group S (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare remifentanil-sevoflurane and remifentanil-propofol hypotensive anaesthesia, for in middle ear surgery and associated, perioperative bleeding, haemodynamics and postoperative recovery characteristics.Materials and Methods: Thirty-six ASA physical status I-II patients were randomized into two groups. Induction of anaesthesia consisted of remifentanil (1 µg kg-1), rocuronium (0.6 mg kg-1) and either, 6 % sevoflurane (Group S) or 2 mg kg-1 propofol (Group P) Maintenance of anaesthesia consisted of a continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.25 µg kg-1 min-1, and 1-2 % sevoflurane (Group S) or 6 mg kg-1 h-1 propofol continuous infusion (Group P) with O2-N2O. Systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures (SAP, DAP, MAP), heart rate (HR), estimated blood loss and recovery characteristics were evaluated.Results: MAP and HR were lower during anesthesia compared to pre-induction values in both groups. There were no difference in haemodynamic variables between groups. In both groups MAP was higher after extubation when compared with preinduction values however there were no difference between groups. HR was higher after extubation compared to pre-induction values in Group S (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada orta kulak cerrahisine yönelik hipotansif anestezide remifentanil-sevofluran ve remifentanil-propofol kombinasyonlarının perioperatuvar kanama, hemodinami ve postoperatuvar derlenme üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: ASA I-II grubu 36 olgu rastgele 2 gruba ayrıldı. Anestezi indüksiyonunda, 1 µ kg-1 remifentanil 0.6 mg kg-1 roküronyum, Grup S'de % 6 sevofluran, Grup P'de 2 mg kg-1 propofol uygulandı. Anestezi idamesinde 0.25 µ kg-1 dk-1 remifentanil infüzyonu, Grup S'de % 1-2 sevofluran, Grup P'de 6 mg kg-1 saat-1 propofol infüzyonu ile O2-N2O karışımı kullanıldı. Olgular sistolik, diastolik, ortalama arter basınçları (SAB, DAB, OAB), kalp atım hızı (KAH), tahmini kan kaybı derlenme kriterleri bakımından değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Her iki gurupta da OAB ve KAH anestezi döneminde induksiyon öncesi değerine göre düşüktü. Gruplar arasında hemodinamik açıdan farklılık yoktu. Her iki gurupta da MAP induksiyon öncesi değerlere göre ekstübasyondan sonra yüksekti, bununla beraber guruplar arasında fark yoktu. KAH ekstübasyon sonrasında, bazal değerlere göre yüksekti, ancak anlamlı fark Grup S'de mevcuttu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DOBRUCALI, H., KILINÇ, L. T., EROL, M. K., SİVRİKAYA, G. U., HANCI, A. (2022). Comparison of remifentanil sevoflurane and remifentanil propofol hypotensive anaesthesia for middle ear surgery. Türk Anestezi ve Reanimasyon Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 5, 400–405. https://ajindex.com/articles/620144

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Donlon Jr. JV. Anesthesia for Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgery. In: Miller RD(ed). Anesthesia. Fifth edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2000, 2173-2198
  2. Van Aken H, Miller Jr ED. Deliberate hypotension. In: Miller RD(ed). Anesthesia. Fifth edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2000, 1470-1490
  3. Degoute CS, Dubreuil C, Ray MJ, et al. Effects of posture, hypotension and locally applied vasoconstriction on the middle ear microcirculation in anaesthetized humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994; 69:414-420
  4. Boezaart AP, van der Merwe J, Coetzee AR. Comparison of sodium nitroprusside-and esmolol-induced controlled hypotension for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42:373-376
  5. Pilli G, Giizeldemir ME, Bayhan N. Esmolol for hypotensive anesthesia in middle ear surgery. Acta AnaesthesiolBelg 1996; 47:85-91
  6. Pavlin JD, Colley PS, Weymuller EA Jr, et al. Propofol versus isoflurane for endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 1999; 20:96-101
  7. Philip BK, Seuderi PE, Chung F, et al. Remifentanil compared with alfentanil for ambulatory surgery using total intravenous anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1997; 84:515-521
  8. Schuttler J, Albrecht S, Breivik H, et al. A comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 1997; 52:307-317
  9. Chillemi S, Sinardi D, Marino A, Mantarro G, Campisi R. The use of remifentanil for bloodless surgical field during vertebral disc resection. Minerva Anestesiol 2002; 68:645-649
  10. Takeda S, Sato N, Tomaru T. Haemodynamic and splanchnic organ blood flow responses during sevoflurane induced hypotension in dogs. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002; 74:513-518
  11. Eberhart LH, Folz B J, Wulf H, Geldner G. Intravenous anesthesia provides optimal surgical conditions during microscopic and endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2003; 113:1369-1373
  12. Guy J, Hindman BJ, Baker KZ, et al. Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing cranio- tomy for supratentorial scape-occupying lesions. Anesthe- siology 1997; 86:514-524
  13. Cohen J, Royston D. Remifentanil. Curr Opin Crit Care 2001; 7:227-231
  14. Grundmann U, Uth M, Eichner A, Wilhelm W, Larsen R. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and re¬mifentanil in paediatric patients: a comparison with a desf-lurane-nitrous oxide inhalation anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998; 42:845-850
  15. Loop T, Priebe HJ. Recovery after anesthesia with re mifentanil combined with propofol, desflurane,